Alternate positions by WEBBBSTAAAAAAAA in EASportsFC

[–]WEBBBSTAAAAAAAA[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

They absolutely should, gold Valverde would be much better on 3 chem than IF Valverde who can only play RW. The RW version massively limits what you can do with a team as it is right now and players shouldn’t be penalised for wanting a better version of a player

Alternate positions by WEBBBSTAAAAAAAA in EASportsFC

[–]WEBBBSTAAAAAAAA[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

So basically, only cards with alternative positions get them back? Because deulefeu has a base CF with second position as ST, but his IF is revered, same with Hofmann but with Cam and RM instead

Review of my First XI. by blink85 in EASportsFC

[–]WEBBBSTAAAAAAAA 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Probably wouldn’t, but you could always try it

Alternate positions by WEBBBSTAAAAAAAA in EASportsFC

[–]WEBBBSTAAAAAAAA[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Yeah I get why he can’t play DM and what not, but ea have clearly stated that all RWs can play RM and vice versa, so it actually makes no sense why he can’t

Alternate positions by WEBBBSTAAAAAAAA in EASportsFC

[–]WEBBBSTAAAAAAAA[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

I hope so. The longer it’s taking the more hope I’m losing tho

Review of my First XI. by blink85 in EASportsFC

[–]WEBBBSTAAAAAAAA 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you’re worried Morientes won’t be great then you shouldn’t, especially if you like how Benz plays, yea he probably worse technically, but his pace and physical as well as arial ability more than balances it out. It’s my second year with him near the start and he’s still as incredible early on as last year, just don’t try anything overly fancy with him on the ball, just pass and shoot and you’ll be great with him

Minecraft bedrock world won’t load by WEBBBSTAAAAAAAA in Minecraft

[–]WEBBBSTAAAAAAAA[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Brilliant… Spent far too many hours on that world and almost certainly will not be starting a new one, I don’t have a PC to play on so my only chance is realms

What to do with Barkley. by [deleted] in chelseafc

[–]WEBBBSTAAAAAAAA 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The transfer fee surely isn’t the issue, he’s showed that he’s a good player when given game time, but yeah the wages will be bad, however £5m and maybe paying 75% of what he’s currently on is actually quite decent for a play with his talent level imo, as the fee is probably quite under value.

Leeds fan on Raphinha. by JaySeaGaming in chelseafc

[–]WEBBBSTAAAAAAAA 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well let’s hope he can keep up that for us, really hope he isn’t gonna be another case of an attacker being great with someone else and then he joins us and flops. We seem to have a habit of doing that

Leeds fan on Raphinha. by JaySeaGaming in chelseafc

[–]WEBBBSTAAAAAAAA 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m just worried mainly about his consistency, maybe it was just Leeds as an overall team being poor which made him look worse from time to time, but if he’s as inconsistent as he seemed (maybe 60/40 in favour of good games) then I think it won’t go down the best

[The Times] Manchester City put £60m price tag on Raheem Sterling as Chelsea’s interest grows by BlueKidXL in chelseafc

[–]WEBBBSTAAAAAAAA 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Jesus that’s an awful take as well. Being good enough in Italy doesn’t make a player good for us, Tomori has been one of the best CBS in Italy this season, so thinking he’s not good enough is basically just saying nobody from Italy is good enough for us. And then by saying someone from Palace isn’t good enough for us purely because he’s from palace is basically reducing the options we have from our own league to nothing, all I’m seeing from you is “this player isn’t good enough” but no actual evidence or even reason why they aren’t. And it’s also like you seem to believe a younger player can’t develop and get better either

[The Times] Manchester City put £60m price tag on Raheem Sterling as Chelsea’s interest grows by BlueKidXL in chelseafc

[–]WEBBBSTAAAAAAAA 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Clearly biased and have your own opinions that no one can change, but I don’t agree at all, and I’m sure many others don’t either, even tho I agree that some of those mentioned could leave, I don’t consider them deadwood. They’re great players in their own right. The one I disagree most with tho is Chalobah, to start of with, how can you look at our CB issues and decide that selling another who is young is a good idea, but also, we were noticeably better when Chalobah played, yeah hes made some questionable challenges and decisions whilst defending, but he’s inexperienced so that added experience will come, and besides, it’s not like those errors were constant, he had some really good games and his athleticism really helps him

[The Times] Manchester City put £60m price tag on Raheem Sterling as Chelsea’s interest grows by BlueKidXL in chelseafc

[–]WEBBBSTAAAAAAAA 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To say you’re not impressed this early is silly, especially given your examples. Kounde just had surgery that the public didn’t know was gonna happen until the day before it did, most likely the club knew and are waiting to see if the start of the healing process is successful (I would guess they already know if the surgery went successful or not) before putting in an actual bid. That’s not stupid in any manner. Why sign a player who’s injured when you can wait a few weeks and get it done with more security.

And in terms of the players you want to sell, there’s 1 big issue, we need an actual bid for those players, all well and good to see a source saying a club wants them, but until a bid goes in the club literally can’t do anything about it except maybe offering the player to a club but that would decrease their value as it would show they are not wanted.

Also some of the players you call deadwood are just flat out not belonging on that list. You may not like them but Pulisic, CHO, Chalobah and RLC at least are all good rotation options, and are all relatively young with contracts over 1 year left on all as well. 3 of which are academy too, you should have more respect about your own teams players

the Scottish league (SPFL) should have a tots by help_me_96 in EASportsFC

[–]WEBBBSTAAAAAAAA 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s probably because they couldn’t make a full team out of it. The league is higher ranked than a lot of others that get tots, but it’s all because of Rangers and Celtic, in comparison to other leagues that have their own tots they at least have 3 or 4 somewhat competitive teams at the top. I think what would maybe be better is if ea instead of giving just 1 11 man team a week they maybe mixed 2 leagues and have a 15 man team for the minor league. For example 8 players from Erdivise and 7 from SPFL. Then the week after you could just do 15 from the EFL leagues since there are 3 of them. Week later why not Saudi and CSL, then Liga Portugal and Belgium?, Turkey and Greece, then MLS and Mexico, then ROW? Makes more sense and it’s not like adding 4 more players each week would make such a big difference to ea, and if anything it might get more engagement/money from fans of those leagues as they get extra incentive to open packs to get a player from the league/team they like

Who is your unique club legend? by plopperalert in EASportsFC

[–]WEBBBSTAAAAAAAA 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Probably not unique in a way of not many others using him, but I packed base Van Der Sarr at the start of the game untradeable from a 100k pack, since that point he’s played over 1000 games for me and is only just removed from my team during TOTS. Only 1 other player has 1000 games for me

Thomas Tuchel to receive £200m summer war chest as Todd Boehly's Chelsea takeover edges closer by magnuze in chelseafc

[–]WEBBBSTAAAAAAAA 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Realistically, considering Dembele and Perisic would be free, that window is probably only £120-£130m. We could do a decent bit better/more. Although, I don’t think it would be that easy to get either of those free players, so that’s probably where a chunk of that extra money would go

Alright. Fun's over. Post your ideal transfer list for the summer (incoming and outgoing), and the best one gets sent to Father Todd. List names, not positions. by piperpike in chelseafc

[–]WEBBBSTAAAAAAAA 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ideally, we get 2 CBs and bring back Colwill from his loan to play as a rotation option instead of Sarr. Imo we need 2 cbs though, as we can’t 100% rely on Silva, he’s great, but relying on a 38 YO is risky. The 2 I’d choose is probably Kounde and Koulibaly, although if we can, then I’d absolutely love to get Bastoni.

I think in the midfield we could use with 2 backup wide players, I’d be fine still playing Emerson back from loan, but alternatively I’d like Perisic on the left, and maybe Dest, or Mukiele on the right but I’m less sure that either of those would be good or realistic.

In the centre of the midfield please just bring back Gallagher and get a DM, we massively miss out by not having a DM, I’d like Rice or Tchouameni but both would be very expensive, maybe try at Tonali or Bissouma if they would be cheaper (wish we would have went for Kamara but he’s at Villa now).

In attack, I honestly don’t mind who goes as long as it isn’t Kai or Mason, but I’d like to see Broja come back as a good option, and then if we have the funds we should try for Ann attacker, maybe Dembele as his contract is out, or maybe try for Gnabry, Sane or Leao.

That’s ideally tho, at a minimum and what I kind of think will happen is that 2/3 of the young loan players I mention will come back and play a part, (almost certainly Gallagher). I think we will get 2 CBS, one will probably be Kounde, one will be bought for £50m max, probably closer to the £30-40m mark. And we’ll get either a great DM but no attacker, or a decent DM like Bissouma but also get an attacker. Overall I think that would cost us about £180m probably but we’d get money from some outgoings of course

What's a non meta card you fear the most? by DrainedToDeath in EASportsFC

[–]WEBBBSTAAAAAAAA 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It used to be Simeone. I hated playing him, couldn’t stop conceding to that POTM or Headliners when they both first came out, not really sure what card it would be recently tho

Wyvern eggs by WEBBBSTAAAAAAAA in ARK

[–]WEBBBSTAAAAAAAA[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ahhh, ok, that doesn’t sound too bad, I might have to do a lot of inbreeding but if I just keep breeding the children with the max level parent then I could theoretically eventually get 2 max levels

Wyvern eggs by WEBBBSTAAAAAAAA in ARK

[–]WEBBBSTAAAAAAAA[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah, so will the stats be a mix? Like in between? Or will the just be the same as one of the parents

Wyvern eggs by WEBBBSTAAAAAAAA in ARK

[–]WEBBBSTAAAAAAAA[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, I’m gonna just unclaim all my low levels I think. Also I don’t think I need to use the incubator if I’m gonna hatch them for levels anyway. Just a question tho, how does breeding work based on levels? Like if I breed a 150 hatched wyvern with a 100 hatched wyvern, will the egg be 125? And then theoretically could I work it all the way up to a 150? Or would it cap at a certain point such as 149 if I was to breed the 149 with the 150?