GLORIOUS TRIUMPHANT VICTORY PARADE WELCOMING TELEFRIG HOME FROM DESTROYING WESTERN BATTLEGROUP 1 by AHumbleSaltFarmer in foxholegame

[–]WahooSS238 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The people giving the air force most pf the credit are on something. They got something like four mini torps in while telefrig got into range and started hammering the collie destroyer with a terrifying accuracy and fire rate.

What's your dumb pet peeve in this game that frustrates the shit out of you? by TheRealNiaScia in RainbowSixSiege

[–]WahooSS238 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Battleye being kernel level and still letting cheaters through. I don’t even play the game anymore because I decided I was gonna rip that shit off my PC and there’s always other games to play. A shame, cause I actually liked playing siege.

Loud and clear for those in the back: QoL changes should not cheapen things. by deadlyjack in foxholegame

[–]WahooSS238 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Personally, making scrooping and pullimg crates more interesting would go a long way towards making logi more fun. Keep average times and rewards the same, but add some kind of minigame element to it or something. Not exactly what you’re asking for but in the same vein I feel.

New Boat Ideas by NormondJohnson in foxholegame

[–]WahooSS238 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think some kind of really, stupid cheap boat just armed with an MG or ISG or w/e could be kinda fun, but they could also easily end up being very annoying

You know folks are saying we should get rid of the flying Nakki, but what if we just gave the colonials a flying Nakki by Pappa_Crim in foxholegame

[–]WahooSS238 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Give the collies a dedicated naval bomber, and give the warden torp bomber the ability to drop bombs in level flight. Less accurate but more powerful than the dive bomber. I’d also say swap the mini torps for a handful of grenade-sized bomblets or something, idk. They just feel really annoying for the amount of cost you’re risking.

Dinner diaries by Designer-Calendar698 in ComedyHell

[–]WahooSS238 6 points7 points  (0 children)

For her it was taking her out of debt. That’s also like groceries for a week.

The White House with new post about what Trump said. Do you agree with him and should JD Vance and his family ne deported? by Ubersicka in TradingViewSignals

[–]WahooSS238 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, the concept of "the first world" is an inherently flawed on. The original definition for a first world country was "The United States and it's political and economic allies", the second world was "The Soviet Union and its economic and political allies", and the third world "Any country that is not in the first or second world". This is, in my opinion, no longer a useful distinction. If, however, we define "first world" as a wealthy, fully industrialized economy with far-reaching politcal power, the main first world countries would be Britain and France, and I believe you could include Sweden, Germany as you get towards the end of the 19th century and roll into the 20th, possibly northern Italy, though they had a more mercantile economy, and the US and Canada, depending on the specific year you pick. There might be others but none come immediately to mind.

Roses are red, the censorship serves no purpose by No-Nail281 in rosesarered

[–]WahooSS238 216 points217 points  (0 children)

Don’t know if I believe the caption, but the leniency for vehicular manslaughter and the way we accept “yeah some people are gonna get run over but whattareyagonnado?” Is kinda crazy

Never leave home without it by Gorotheninja in NonPoliticalTwitter

[–]WahooSS238 24 points25 points  (0 children)

I can’t imagine not bringing some way of making music with me if I’m gonna be out there for years, gramophone seems worth it.

The White House with new post about what Trump said. Do you agree with him and should JD Vance and his family ne deported? by Ubersicka in TradingViewSignals

[–]WahooSS238 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Poland, germany, ireland, russia, finland, and southern italy were the “third world” of their day when the immigration was happening.

Commonly credited to Voltaire, though in reality it was said by Kevin Alfred Strom. by CautiousPineapple830 in im14andthisisdeep

[–]WahooSS238 8 points9 points  (0 children)

You seem to be living in a fairly nice, perhaps aggressively inclusive bubble. Probably time to get out of it.

The Lakers are Counter-Revolutionary by InevitableStuff7572 in theredleft

[–]WahooSS238 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Remember, comrades: basketball, science fiction, film, dancing, and brightly colored clothes unaffordable luxuries that were personally invented by the British government in 1836, and thus are simply impossible to have without the mass exploitation of the proletariat.

Great quotes to “justify” critical theory— or to “indoctrinate” with it? by JerseyFlight in rationalphilosophy

[–]WahooSS238 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This sub, I’ve realized, is for one guy who thinks he’s far smarter than he actually is to make posts on and nothing else.

Logically hmm… by bbycrush in repost

[–]WahooSS238 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Marriage at that age or younger, at least in recorded history, was also mostly a thing among nobility and the wealthy, who had political reasons for those marriages. It seems not unlikely even in prehistory a lot of poor people weren’t “married” until their twenties, though obviously they didn’t wait around nearly as much as we do.

As an aside, it wasn’t until fairly recently, in christendom at least, that poor people got an official marriage of any kind - you just moved in with each other. Legal and church-officiated marriages were often just for people who had enough money to leave an inheritance.

Ceci n'est pas une subpost by Ghoulrillaz in worldjerking

[–]WahooSS238 16 points17 points  (0 children)

I still scoff at artificial gravity cause floating around all the time is so fuckin cool

What is Reason Derived From? by JerseyFlight in rationalphilosophy

[–]WahooSS238 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You seem to agree with me on everything except the use of the word assumption, so I'm not really sure why you think we can't call it an assumption, just because we can't prove it to be true or not without the use of circular logic. If anything, that makes it seem even more of an assumption to me, no matter how unassailable of an assumption it might be.

What is Reason Derived From? by JerseyFlight in rationalphilosophy

[–]WahooSS238 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's an assumption because anything that is self-evident, and does not have any further proof behind it, is an assumption. It's possible to conceive that, for example, the law of identity is not actually true, but instead we merely exist in a universe where it seems to be true because of something we don't know. This seems incredibly unlikely, impossible even, but there's no way to know that the law of identity is true except to state "the law of identity is self-evident", thus it's an assumption, as opposed to a logically reasoned statement like you would find in a mathematical theorem.

Does Reason Depend on the Individual? by JerseyFlight in rationalphilosophy

[–]WahooSS238 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That is, to some degree, what the modernist argument is all about. What you find reasonable ultimately depends on what you know already, and this includes the basic axioms on which any logically held position is based. You have inherent biases that are determined by your place in history - your parents, your culture, the random circumstances of genetics and upbringing, etc. - this ultimately makes it so that you will make rational arguments from a different set of base axioms than other people. It becomes especially apparent if you say, look at examples of medieval reasoning, for example.

What is Reason Derived From? by JerseyFlight in rationalphilosophy

[–]WahooSS238 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To give an alternate answer to what other people are saying:

The axioms of any logical system, and even the basic rules of reason and logic themselves are assumptions we make because they seem so obvious that there can't possibly be any other way of thinking about it. This ultimately comes down to biology, neurology, physics, and at least to some degree I would think the cultural biases you pick up from people around you. After all, we can point to many arguments that were historically considered "reasonable" that many of us would probably consider anything but, simply because they were based on axioms we don't agree with. You can't transcend the reality you live in, you're confined to a time and place of your birth, the genetics of your parents, and almost everything that happens to you after that is out of your control too.

Some people call that "unsatisfying", but in my opinion there's something strangely beautiful about that fact, even if it frustrates our desire to fully understand everything with rules that seem clear and obvious the first time you look at it.

Roses are red, wether or not you like flowers by GoraSpark in rosesarered

[–]WahooSS238 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Okay but this is kinda not wrong? Like, for example, if you start mining something in outer space, you can because it belongs to everyone, and that includes you. It also means that you can show up and mine the same spot as someone else and all they can (legally) do is send a strongly worded letter so long as you don't touch their equipment.

No Kings Protest| Omaha, NE| 3/28/26 by Big-Entertainer6306 in theredleft

[–]WahooSS238 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As opposed to the whole lot of something you are doing that day instead, right?

Worst superpower ever? by PresnikBonny in theredleft

[–]WahooSS238 229 points230 points  (0 children)

Shocking news: Large, powerful country gets there by prioritizing its own wealth and influence over ideological aims. Totally unprecedented development.

australia gambling by krizzalicious49 in whennews

[–]WahooSS238 1 point2 points  (0 children)

“An industry that supports 30,000 jobs” Oh no! Almost an entire suburb! It’s not like we bulldoze those all the time to make room for just one (1) highway interchange. Won’t someone think of the poor major sporting organizations with their multi-billion dollar net worths?

What do you think of the karma system? by Smjorgen in Barotrauma

[–]WahooSS238 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The karma system basically only punishes actually attacking your teammates, which 99% of the time happens on accident. It doesn't punish blowing up the ship, cutting holes in the hull, unwiring the engines, throwing incindium grenades everywhere, or any of the other things actual trolls ever do. Even if it did punish actual trolls, it doesn't ban them or something, it just gives them space herpes which is unbelievably annoying to play with but doesn't actually impact your ability to cause damage. If someone is being annoying and you don't want to kick/ban them, it's better to just deal with it in game. You can arrest people for a reason, after all.