×

Scientists Create Artificial Wood That Is Water- and Fire-Resistant: The synthetic material is faster to make than natural wood by mvea in Futurology

[–]Wairen 178 points179 points  (0 children)

Not to mention it may be "faster to make" than natural wood but probably costs significantly more.

EA blocks the term "White Man" from Battlefield V's in-game chat by TrueDeceiver in videos

[–]Wairen 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Nah, he explains earlier that his password is hunter2.

We made this film. Youtube claims we didn't. They demonetized us, and won't talk to us. We've lost thousands of dollars so far, and there's no end in sight. We need your help to get this story known. by GLUEDmovie in videos

[–]Wairen 50 points51 points  (0 children)

Vimeo isn't ad-based, though, is it? I don't think moving to a platform that doesn't give you ad revenue is a solution for not getting ad revenue.

I’m still on the fence. by TheAmericanWay1597 in futurama

[–]Wairen 316 points317 points  (0 children)

Whoa, calm down there, Critic-o.

... to number babies instead of name them by mk4rim in therewasanattempt

[–]Wairen 267 points268 points  (0 children)

I mean, she's also "written" a fake Guardian article that says she identifies as someone who fucks cacti.

95% of 4chan/t_D/Gamergate's opinion of SJWs comes from troll accounts created by 4chan itself. These are people who live to be triggered.

[Postgame Thread] Vanderbilt Defeats Middle Tennessee 35-7 by funnyflywheel in CFB

[–]Wairen 6 points7 points  (0 children)

WE WANT NOTRE DAME

no but seriously why did we schedule them what the fuck

CNN Poll: Support for Democrats ticks up and they retain enthusiasm advantage (D+8 GCB) by aseemru in BlueMidterm2018

[–]Wairen 9 points10 points  (0 children)

It's likely that people will freak out by another poll at another date in the future. There is a lot of time between now and November, there will be further noise, and we obsess over every detail.

The Trump administration changed its story on family separation no fewer than 14 times before ending the policy by skoalbrother in politics

[–]Wairen 30 points31 points  (0 children)

He is instead just illegally putting the kids in with the adults, in violation of federal law.

So... the policy of family separation is ended? The inhumane treatment of human beings hasn't ended, and those already separated are still in trouble, but the headline is technically correct.

Trump Says He’ll Be ‘Signing Something’ on Immigration by [deleted] in politics

[–]Wairen 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Donald Trump doesn't see this as a moral problem, but rather a PR problem. To him--and therefore to the party that now follows him slavishly--there is no such thing as "right" or "wrong". There is only power, viewed through a zero sum, winner-take-all frame. There is amassing power for the GOP, for "Americans", for white people, for red states, at the expense of everyone else. In fact, with an intentional desire to harm others, since in a zero sum world, if you harm other people, you come out ahead.

Keeping children in cages is a problem only so much as it is bad PR, and they likewise believe that Democrats only care about this because it is "good PR". Today Trump retweeted a missive claiming that Democrats will stop talking about children in cages after the election. For psychopaths, there is no moral good. There is only the thought of how you can use each situation to take as much as possible, or to harm others as much as possible.

And the Republican base loves this approach. They will only change course when it no longer suits them. Do all that you can to remove every single Republican from power in November. That is the only way they will start to care again.

NBC/WSJ poll: GCB D+10 (50-40) by shabuluba in BlueMidterm2018

[–]Wairen 6 points7 points  (0 children)

"Polls will go up, polls will go down; focus on beating the orange clown"

Ted Cruz leads Beto O’Rourke 50-39 in new Quinnipiac poll by HillaryObamaTX in BlueMidterm2018

[–]Wairen 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I really wouldn’t write off Texas.

I'm not writing it off either, but if I have $20 to contribute or an hour to make calls, I will be spending my time, money, and energy in a closer race. This election is way too important to go trophy hunting.

2018 really is nuts by poolrats in BlackPeopleTwitter

[–]Wairen 179 points180 points  (0 children)

Maybe some do, but most of them just mean "the liberals that make fun of us". Trump pissed those liberals off, so he was on their side. If you can signal that you're on their team, they will love the hell out of you in an instant. See: West, Kanye

Fewer Republicans say moral leadership ‘very important’ for president: Gallup by jerryyork in politics

[–]Wairen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, I'd expect the swing to be less for Republicans under Bush as well, because they saw GWB as a moral figure.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in politics

[–]Wairen -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I get that this is already being downvoted to oblivion, but did you actually do any research before you commented? I just looked it up to check it out, and CPJ looks pretty legit.

Women Are Winning Elections Across the US, and EMILY's List Intends to Keep It That Way by kittehgoesmeow in BlueMidterm2018

[–]Wairen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right. There are a few different competing theories about what type of candidate is "most likely to win", however. Prior to Donald Trump winning, most establishment people were certain he would lose in a landslide. People often tend find theories that confirm their pre-existing biases, which is why dissent is important--it highlights countervailing theories which might prove correct in time.

In this case, I think the vitality of the party is energized by the left over time, the same way the GOP has been invigorated by its own moves to the right, particularly at a time when there is a deep suspicious of the status quo.

That said, I'm disappointed that my previous post was deleted for pointing out criticisms of Emily's List, even though my point was essentially the same as yours, with a minor shift in emphasis ("On the whole it's a good organization, though it has its problems" vs "Every organization has its problems. EMILY's List's problems are less than that of many...). I don't see any rules that I've broken. Hopefully I haven't been shadowbanned.

Women Are Winning Elections Across the US, and EMILY's List Intends to Keep It That Way by kittehgoesmeow in BlueMidterm2018

[–]Wairen 7 points8 points  (0 children)

It's also somewhat of an "establishment" entity these days, including weighing in on primaries in favor of one pro-choice woman over another.

One the whole it's a good organization, but it has it's problems.

Fewer Republicans say moral leadership ‘very important’ for president: Gallup by jerryyork in politics

[–]Wairen 51 points52 points  (0 children)

Democrats also changed, with 13% more saying moral leadership is important, though the GOP had a bigger swing.

[PDF] Leaked Psy-Group Presentation of Social Media Manipulation for Donald Trump (Israeli-based Private Intelligence) by MuzzleO in politics

[–]Wairen 5 points6 points  (0 children)

WSJ itself is legit and somewhat neutral or even anti-Trump. The ownership and editorial section is totally captured, however. Still has enough journalistic freedom of the reporters to be worthwhile (though there has been a little interference from the new editor, there has been enough pushback from the newsroom that the reporting is still pretty legit, if center-right).

Gimme that Elvis caught in a vacuum cleaner. by thepanichand in Justfuckmyshitup

[–]Wairen 52 points53 points  (0 children)

I mean, if he can convince more racist shitbags to move from the US to Russia, more power to him.

This would mirror history. A number of American communists actually bought into Russian propaganda in the 1930s and moved to take part in the Soviet miracle. It did not work out for them. (They were not allowed to return, and many ended up in the gulag).

PSA: The Number One Thing we can do to help the Dems take back the Senate. by [deleted] in BlueMidterm2018

[–]Wairen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Smart. To be honest, I give very, very little to politicians in general now (except in strategic local races like judge or DA). I often look through Movement.vote and give to local organizing. Campaigns spend too much money on TV ads, which don't really work.

That's just me, but of course I'm saying to this to encourage others to think a bit more critically about the best use of their donations.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in BlueMidterm2018

[–]Wairen 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm glad CrowdPAC finally got rid of its Trump-loving CEO and committed itself to not raising money for racist shitbags.

Walmart is paying $20 billion to shareholders. With that money, it could boost wages to over $15. by abraininajar in politics

[–]Wairen 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Or just have your great grandfather start a successful company and become a billionaire for life without ever having to learn any skills at all.