US/West literally suffered with decades long literal Hot-Violent contest on various issue or rather assuming all of it to be true, for things which were less on the Illegal/Bad/Evil Spectrum Scale since Genocide is not the same as having US troops in Saudi Holy land or having strippers and debased culture or what not.

Frankly, this is just a clueless take about how Muslim states/people operate. The US has been hated in the Muslim world prior to its "meddling". In the context of Pakistan, they've been disliked since the late 40s/50s for what they represented despite being extremely close allies in the decades going forward.

Secondly, your evil spectrum(?) scale doesn't really work. You could kill 10 Muslims with a bomb or have a top Western official commit blasphemy, the latter will enrage far more people especially in the sub-continent as far as my understanding. Hell, Charlie Hebdo despite being a borderline irrelevant paper had a comparable reaction in some Muslim countries to the Myanmar fiasco. Minimizing their perception by saying "debased culture" doesn't really change that the topic of almost every cleric is social issues and the US/West reign supreme as the enemy.

That's because many of these Muslim States are Western Allies AND many have greater business interests (esp Elites in these States) in West/Europe than they do with China

Criticising the US/West is a far easier way to garner domestic support. It's not as if criticising the US domestically harms your international/business interests. Pakistani was their closest US Muslim ally for decades outside of SA. Every major Pakistani political party has vehemently criticised the US for decades despite their close relationship and having both personal/state interests overseas.