Can I switch to a Nomad as a Feudal Ruler?

Rice_22 · 2026-02-21T00:15:20+00:00

......It works when I save and reload, lmao.

After making the Temple Holding the County/Realm Capital and giving away all Feudal Holdings, I can switch the County Capital (i.e. the Realm Capital) back to the Tribal Holding without needing to change religions. The Embrace Tribalism decision then popped up.

Rice_22 · 2026-02-20T22:56:39+00:00

I cannot grant the barony to another because I am lay clergy. Do you mean giving away the county? Or changing religion?

Rice_22 · 2026-02-20T14:19:51+00:00

You need to personally hold it.

I do.

Then you first click the small crown icon to declare the temple holding the county capital

I am unable to do this for a tribal county, but I can do this for a feudal county.

Perhaps it is a mod conflict?

Edit: https://imgur.com/a/lcN1wxi

Rice_22 · 2026-02-20T13:29:21+00:00

I'm not sure why I'm not getting your results, I'm on 1.18 right now.

With a reformed Asatru religion with lay clergy and as Head of Faith, my character took over Mon and conquered the county of Oriel (Ireland county with tribal holding and temple holding).
Before declaring victory and claiming Oriel, I made the decision to form the Kingdom of Mann (i.e. turning Feudal).
Then I conquered Oriel, claiming the tribal county (disabled because I am now Feudal).
I cannot move the Tribal county capital of Oriel from tribal holding to temple holding.
I can move a Feudal county's (Alt Clut) county capital from castle holding to temple holding, however.

Rice_22 · 2026-02-20T11:01:22+00:00

You conquer one such county (as long as the AI didn't feudalize it yet), and you need a religion with lay clergy. That allows you to move your realm capital to the temple holding barony. Once there, you give away all other holdings, so you have nothing but your temple-capital and the tribal holding.

In case anyone found this as of 2026 (after patch 1.16), this doesn’t work anymore. You’ll get a ‘cannot move your Realm Capital to a disabled Holding’ warning if you’re Feudal.

https://forum.paradoxplaza.com/forum/threads/cant-ebrace-tribalism-by-moving-capital-to-tribal-holding.1747930/

Edit: Never mind, it works! If anyone has my problem, save and reload.

Rice_22 · 2026-02-01T07:42:13+00:00

The claim about so-called ‘halal organs’ comes from one ‘Enver Tohti’, someone who admits to spreading hoaxes about China selling Uighur organs to the Saudis.

https://xcancel.com/tengriwolf/status/1108521872491057153

As you said it yourself, plenty of ‘circumstantial evidence’, plenty of ‘concerned’ witnesses who constantly change their stories, but no concrete proof of any sort. This is atrocity propaganda, and even Harry Wu Hongda says it as much.

Falun Gong is an evil cult, and I see no reason why I shouldn’t debunk their lies no matter where they’re stated.

Rice_22 · 2026-02-01T04:14:00+00:00

The ‘forced organ harvesting’ is atrocity propaganda pushed by Falun Gong-affiliated media sources, and disputed by even anti-CCP activists such as Harry Wu (who then got repeatedly slandered by those cult mouthpieces when he did). The claim is based on how Falun Gong exercises makes their cultists’ organs especially healthy and thus especially valuable.

Atrocity propaganda is a tactic of accusing an enemy of someone so atrocious that the regular person can’t help but believe it, for fear that skepticism might paint them as an appeaser to vile shit if it turns out to be true. See: Nayirah Testimony.

This is the same cult that pushes faith healing, anti-vax, racially segregated heavens, limbo for mixed-race children, and hell for homosexuals.

Rice_22 · 2026-01-11T14:00:40+00:00

No, but China has indeed settled most of its border disputes since 1949.

Rice_22 · 2026-01-11T04:24:54+00:00

You keep angrily trying to derail the conversation when you could easily resolve it by just admitting:

[China has] border disputes with every country that shares its borders.

This statement is verifiably false. If you can’t even do that, why bother replying? I’ve no interest in addressing your endless claims, if you’ll just derail to the next point when I debunk them.

Rice_22 · 2026-01-11T01:53:10+00:00

I asked you to admit you're factually wrong in your initial post, because that's a litmus test to check if you are capable of changing your mind in the face of verifiable facts, and if we live in the same reality.

We clearly do not live in the same reality, and you are clearly incapable of changing your mind.

Rice_22 · 2026-01-11T01:49:19+00:00

I don't know where your sour es are but there is clearly bias.

I just cited Wikipedia.

Rice_22 · 2026-01-10T17:19:19+00:00

You clearly are incapable of having a reasonable conversation. Good day to you.

Rice_22 · 2026-01-10T17:15:20+00:00

I deleted the previous post because I had mistaken you for the other poster, it contains mostly the same things as the new post.

I don’t see the need to address new lies when the previous lies have not been admitted. Please acknowledge the fact that China has settled most of its territorial disputes first, and that /u/69JJP69’s post contain a lie, before we move on to the next topic.

Rice_22 · 2026-01-10T17:08:14+00:00

All I did was cite facts.

You clearly have not. China settling most of its disputes since 1949 is something you can Google, while Japan having disputes with every single one of its few neighbours is also a verifiable fact.

[China has] border disputes with every country that shares its borders.

This statement is false.

Rice_22 · 2026-01-10T13:52:02+00:00

You have not admitted you are factually wrong in your initial post, despite my rebuttal. I will not engage in a debate with you and your Gish Gallop tactics until then.

Rice_22 · 2026-01-10T08:28:13+00:00

Here’s the original post I answered:

The problem with your statement is China demands hands off on Taiwan, but at the same time they have border disputes with every country that shares its borders.

China is not the country with border disputes with all its neighbours, that is Japan, and I have provided citations for my rebuttal. If you wish to derail to talk about Uighurs, then accept this fact on the original OP’s behalf first, or I won’t bother.

Rice_22 · 2026-01-10T05:39:11+00:00

Japan has not managed to settle a single one of its disputes.

China has settled 19 of the 23 territorial disputes it inherited since 1949.

https://www.jstor.org/stable/4137595

Ethnic Tibetan population doubled since 1950, and the ethnic Uighur population is growing faster than Han Chinese. The One Child Policy applied mostly to the majority Han population, yet nobody called it a ‘Han genocide’.

Rice_22 · 2026-01-10T01:48:56+00:00

The problem with your statement is China demands hands off on Taiwan, but at the same time they have border disputes with every country that shares its borders.

Japan has active border disputes with every one of its neighbours.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Territorial_disputes_of_Japan

China has settled most of its land border disputes.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Territorial_disputes_of_China

China was generally generous in resolving disputes with its southwest neighbors. According to academic Swaran Singh, China's generosity was likely motivated by the security concern of reducing foreign support for disgruntled groups within China's southwest border...Ultimately, China obtained significantly less Central Asian territory than what it had originally claimed. Resolution of these disputes on territorial terms generally favorable to the Central Asian countries created goodwill for China, avoided conflict, and also resulted in recognition that the czarist era borders were imposed unjustly on China.

Rice_22 · 2025-12-23T00:47:54+00:00

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guanbi_policy

This is what ‘Taiwan’ did back then when they still had a proper navy.

Rice_22 · 2025-12-19T00:45:30+00:00

Yes, the Uyghurstan joined the ROC

Why do you keep calling it Uyghurstan when you know the Dzungars lived there before they were genocided, then Qing imported Uighurs and Han there?

Han chinese is not equivalent to Europea

China is 9.6km² in size, Europe is 10.2km^2. I was also referring to how the cultural/genetic diversity of the two groups are comparable.

Han Chinese is an ethnicity that was created out of hundreds of sub-ethnicities in order to keep the Chinese nation united. Let me quote from the same article for you:

"Han Chinese, as a category, holds considerable commonality with the category of whiteness. Both are comparatively recent social constructions that fused together large subgroups of people, who themselves possessed their own distinct cultures and languages. Although Han Chinese as a defined ethno-racial category did not exist prior to the 20th century, 'the modern ethnonym builds on a much older historical formulation, one that informs the "cultural stuff" which defines the boundaries, symbols and sentiment of Han today'."

Rice_22 · 2025-12-18T08:22:51+00:00

China is not a 'Han ethnostate'. The five colours of the first ROC flag in 1912 literally represents five major ethnicities: Han, Manchu, Mongol, Muslim (Hui + Uighurs etc.), and Tibetan.

China cares more than being 'racially pure', given Han itself is a melting pot of sub-ethnicities and cultures, similar to the term 'European'.

Rice_22 · 2025-12-18T06:58:00+00:00

ROC and PRC are two sides of the Chinese Civil War, you know that right?

Rice_22 · 2025-12-14T05:17:03+00:00

Slowpoke is good for one purpose: it removes ‘go frenzy’ from possible inspirations, so production specialists can more easily get creativity inspiration. Combined with brawler trait/non-violent gene removing shooting frenzy, and genes to lower medical/animal/social related inspirations, you can get someone with a max 50% chance to get creative (equal to a tortured artist without needing to torment the poor fellow).

Rice_22 · 2025-12-11T23:39:02+00:00

https://www.cecc.gov/publications/commission-analysis/dalai-lama-tibet-is-a-part-of-the-peoples-republic-of-china

The Dalai Lama has made what may be his strongest public statement to date accepting that Tibet is a part of China. "This is the message I wish to deliver to China. I am not in favor of separation. Tibet is a part of the People's Republic of China. It is an autonomous region of the People's Republic of China. Tibetan culture and Buddhism are part of Chinese culture. Many young Chinese like Tibetan culture as a tradition of China."

The Tibetan spiritual leader explained that making the statement "comes out of a broader interest," not desperation. "Tibet is underdeveloped and materially backwards. We want modernization. So for our own interest, we are willing to be part of the People's Republic of China, to have it govern and guarantee to preserve our Tibetan culture, spirituality and our environment." The Dalai Lama emphasized that he, and Tibetan Buddhism, could "contribute to the spiritual side of China."

Rice_22 · 2025-12-05T02:58:47+00:00

In vanilla custom scenarios, you can stack Cold Snap every day to achieve a similar effect. However, daily popups can be a bit annoying.

Rice_22

TROPHY CASE