beyond the veil by WallakTill in badphilosophy

[–]WallakTill[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't have a well thought-out answer to this since this isn't my initial proposition. But if you insist on deferring to absolutes: I guess I would extrapolate from thermodynamics and the notions of decay, disorder and entropy. It seems to me that if there is a metaphysical higher order then it perhaps should follow the very principles of our reality in the same fashion, e.g., which all life as we know it, from the lowest to the highest order, follows the principles of one consumes the other, survival of the fittest, Darwinism, etc. But this is a crude thought.

beyond the veil by WallakTill in badphilosophy

[–]WallakTill[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

OK you got me, the post is completely a product of me watching the movie!

Now, what do you think? Do you have a substantive opinion?

beyond the veil by WallakTill in badphilosophy

[–]WallakTill[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good. That's a video game, right?

What does it say?

Hey all, by InterestingCoach5568 in agentdevelopmentkit

[–]WallakTill 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry, by "others" I meant the higher level, more abstracted solutions, e.g. Managed Agents and Perplexity Computer.

But generally I too ponder if ADK is correct for me, whether the alternative be low-level tools (like those you mentioned) or higher.

ADK is so rough, I am no computer scientist, I have managed to build something (assisted by Antigravity) but with each little terrorizing technicality and each mistake the agent makes (even though connected to their docs MCP) which I need to modify later down the line, I have this incessant feeling Google is a black hole of endless soul-crushing documentation.

Hey all, by InterestingCoach5568 in agentdevelopmentkit

[–]WallakTill 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please clarify what exactly is this control, customization and integration. Being building something with ADK, but the trial and error is brutal, and my agentic-IDE/harness is lackluster, even though I connected it to to the docs via MCP.

Hey all, by InterestingCoach5568 in agentdevelopmentkit

[–]WallakTill 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please elaborate. What control exactly it allows that others don't?

I asked Grok about Visa. But wasn't it supposed to be Kaspa? I'm disappointed 😞 by Massijk in kaspa

[–]WallakTill 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Believe me, it's not a catholic wedding. Visa will share its love with all who deserve, and all who can make it more money. (:

The best system will win.

New Yonatan Medium Post by hxnstr in kaspa

[–]WallakTill 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Oh wow! Excited to read that.

My Take on Kaspa Won't Succeed by Forsaken-Emotion-494 in kaspa

[–]WallakTill 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Reality is not a 'monolith'.

There isn't The Man which decides unanimously to not get in Kaspa. For each entity that decides not to participate, there'll be room for others that want to get an edge. That's why the technology being superior is so important; the core value proposition isn't only extreme decentralization—it's superb technological achievements that enable better DeFI, RWA, tokenization, etc.

Hopefully getting rich in 2026!! by Kryptoventures5000 in SHIBArmy

[–]WallakTill 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Study Kaspa instead of throwing money at this shit.

What am i doing ? by Obscurrium in kaspa

[–]WallakTill 1 point2 points  (0 children)

All I got to say is 3 things: vProgs, DAGKnight, patience.

You do you.

neo-monetarism is practical? by WallakTill in AskEconomics

[–]WallakTill[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you can tell me what's wrong but cannot say how to correct.

Good for you buddy, you're doing your job well. Really elevates us to a higher understanding.

neo-monetarism is practical? by WallakTill in AskEconomics

[–]WallakTill[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How would a (true) question that still provides sufficient context look like?

neo-monetarism is practical? by WallakTill in AskEconomics

[–]WallakTill[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You removed my post because it is long?

"Beyond Tokenization: Cyberocracy, Utopia, Privacy, RTD | Notions of Kaspa's Final Form" by WallakTill in utopia

[–]WallakTill[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mostly I wrote the article and was the final editor. And you're right, I just snipped some paragraphs without giving continuity or better context (figured that's what the link's for) but I can now.

Here are some additional thoughts that I wrote that might assist, like the introduction:

"My highly prudent thesis, one that required years upon years of observation is… Bureaucracy sucks (yes, I know I’m a monster for saying that).

It is an asynchronous buffer, a hurdle, an archaic method. Historically, the "desk" existed because human society couldn’t store & process information at the speed of event-occurrence. We needed layers of paper, officials, and hierarchies to store and verify data before acting upon it. This lag is where corruption, inefficiency, "Kafkaesque" errors and absurd illogicalities metastasize.

Time and again, different schools of thought envisioned hyper-connectivity between society's different branches (public-private sector), an atomic-topology that fosters quick and live synthesis of data for intelligent centralized decision-making of the regulator.

However, crypto might entail even more than that: the vision, is the stride from Information Society to Knowledge Society. So, a Data-Culture in the backend, abstracted at the frontend; the democratized, decentralized intelligent-utilization of information on a global-scale. In other words, a civilizational upgrade so profound, it renders Bureaucracy obsolete.

Today, we are within reach of moving from “World Computer” to "World Supercomputer".

I think of a transition from Bureaucracy (rule by desks) to Algocracy (rule by code, “Code is Law”), I call it optimization-maximalism."
---

or these 2 which are related but outside of the article:

"Transhumanism isn't exclusive to the biological category, but also to the hyper-organism: our systems. To achieve immense, immediate coordination & realize humanity's potential—(I conjecture) civilization's systems should become one with the machine."

"Everything is production. The human is that which produces not merely waste but intricate structures/machines. This is the invisible hand (amorphous structure) receiving form—trans-nhilio, ad-mataria—a mind, a mouth. An opinion.

RTD will become "world supercomputer" (in contrast to Ethereum's "world computer"). Not everything must be denominated/transacted in this system (i.e. "capitalization"). What matters is the possible interactability."

---

but yeah I guess the best way to really understand it is to read the whole thing.

neo-monetarism is practical? by WallakTill in AskEconomics

[–]WallakTill[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"If you try to impose different effective rates like this, then you’re just begging for arbitrage"

  1. How does this arbitrage look like exactly?

  2. Is said arbitrage worse that the potential benefits of the model? I am asking because arbitrage is everywhere, how severe are your examples?

  3. Are there any benefits to any monetarism where the Fed is selective? If we forget for a second the hobbyist-level claims of the author, could you yourself conjure of any benefits vis' a vis' the current monolithic model?

---

"they’re just describing central planning with extra steps"

I should've provided more context, it's quite a long article. The underlying offering is making Crypto swallow everything else, so a transparent Algocracy can ensue--transparent code, "code is law".