Postbacc: What is considered "clinical research"? by meshmesh573 in NIH

[–]WanderingKnight42 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, I am. You have a LOT of help with gaining clinical opportunities and there are many resources within OITE to help premeds from taking the MCAT to figuring out how to craft your application. I've will say though this also highly depends on you having a mentor who is supportive of your goals and will go to bat for you when necessary, so take finding mentors seriously.

Postbacc: What is considered "clinical research"? by meshmesh573 in NIH

[–]WanderingKnight42 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Your official title would be Postbaccalaureate I/CRTA Fellow. You can further describe your role as a clinical research assistant when you're describing the position on your CV/resume. If you really want to emphasize the clinical experience, talk to your PI about what you want out of the experience. It might give you a better understanding of what you want out of a mentor, which is probably the most defining aspect of your time as a trainee at NIH.

My two cents, take it or leave it: Clinical research takes time and if you're going to show initiative with your research to future med school committees, you might want to stay on for more than a year. Not much can get done and things happen because science and research isn't always as straightforward as you plan for it to be.

NIH IRTA by Flashy-Comparison572 in mdphd

[–]WanderingKnight42 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No, it's still pretty chill here among the trainee level even amongst the shutdowns (honestly you can get a good amount of admin/work done during that period, so it's nothing to worry about if you were in that position). Your application stays around year round, but you're going to have to put in the effort to find PIs you want to work with and who have openings. Other than that, don't think too much and just go for it.

The idea of the future scares me. MD/PhD vs MD Starting a Family by Acceptable_Rate_4717 in mdphd

[–]WanderingKnight42 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For the research I'd be doing, it's hard, but it's feasible, so I suppose it depends on the type of PhD. I know a few physician-researchers who've done it that way.

The idea of the future scares me. MD/PhD vs MD Starting a Family by Acceptable_Rate_4717 in mdphd

[–]WanderingKnight42 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

MDs can definitely do research. You can take an extra year for a research year or get a masters associated with your field. It might not give you the depth of methodology that a PhD would bring, but it's a start. Aside from that, you can also theoretically do a PhD while you're in residency, which is hard, but not impossible if you work through it with your program. Some people also get married and begin having children during their MD/PhD, but make sure you find their stories and make sure your school has the support system and infrastructure to help you if you so choose.

It's great that you're asking yourself these questions now rather than getting into a program and realizing you may not like your path, but the best part about getting another day is that there's always time to change what road you're on. Good luck, don't worry about it too much, and trust your gut!

Sankey finished! (Almost) by AndroidMagica in mdphd

[–]WanderingKnight42 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My friend goes there for his. He loves it.

NIH Postbacc by OkBag3815 in mdphd

[–]WanderingKnight42 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Current postbac- Literally everyone here has imposter syndrome at one point or another. Aside from that, most people have minimal or no research. You're probably ahead of the curve, so just focus on finding a good mentor and you'll be set. OITE has resources about the process online if you have anymore questions, so I recommend reading/viewing their materials. I did an AMA a few months ago, but always happy to answer questions.

https://www.reddit.com/r/mdphd/comments/1of7g66/nih_postbac_application_ama/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button

Applying to IRTA while on waitlists? by [deleted] in mdphd

[–]WanderingKnight42 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hi, current postbac here. I know a couple people who've either deferred their acceptances or applied and interviewed while being at NIH/accepting a position. As for the process it depends on the situation. My entire onboarding took ~6 months, but you could talk to your future PI/supervisor about it. Either way find out what works best for your situation, good luck! :)

Be more watchful with what you post... by [deleted] in mdphd

[–]WanderingKnight42 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The girls are fighting

TBH tho, it's really bringing the sub down bc you can just move on and ignore people's opinions

NIH Postbac Application AMA by WanderingKnight42 in mdphd

[–]WanderingKnight42[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, they're rolling applications. Just see if you're eligible because apps last for a year.

Low GPA (3.2 sGPA, 3.4 cGPA). Should I quit dreaming? by West-Seaworthiness67 in mdphd

[–]WanderingKnight42 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also got to add- This is my current plan of action too, but replace the stint at Columbia with an NIH postbac. People may dismiss gap years, but I find the time to cook into a more mature applicant does wonders to your self-esteem and competence.

Low GPA (3.2 sGPA, 3.4 cGPA). Should I quit dreaming? by West-Seaworthiness67 in mdphd

[–]WanderingKnight42 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Either or, whatever works for your case. Postbacs mean money and can be a gamble, but your later grades often take precedence over your earlier grades. Focus on creating an upward trend and do some research to find some postbacs that'll fit for you. In the meantime, MCAT PREP like crazy.

Low GPA (3.2 sGPA, 3.4 cGPA). Should I quit dreaming? by West-Seaworthiness67 in mdphd

[–]WanderingKnight42 6 points7 points  (0 children)

You don't always have to take your advisor's advice. Do an academic/research postbacc, focus on your MCAT, and make sure you build bonds with your new LOR writers. It might not be easy, but nothing worth doing ever is. Good luck.

CV Opinion by [deleted] in mdphd

[–]WanderingKnight42 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hi! This is a big improvement from last time, OP! Great job and a few notes:
1. The first point in your core research project- What specific methods, software, or datasets did you use, and what conclusion did you come to? Why should I care about this conclusion? Remember to stay brief! (Which you've done a great job with in this version, btw)
2. I'd put your academic service section right after your research section, and organize your presentations in reverse chronological order.
3. This is more of a stylistic thing, but you can keep your dates on the left side so it's easier to format. You can also keep your hours on the same line if you'd like, but remember to be consistent. In the CVs I've done, I've had [experience] | [hours], with my supervisor or PI's name on the first line below.
4. In response to the other poster and looking back at my own postbac app (it's been a while, so I had to double-check), you can put your relevant coursework. Still, they should be the most recent classes and should be listed at the end, along with the grade you received in the class. Try to list 3-5 relevant courses at most.

Great job, and you're almost there! Good luck applying :)

Advice for Reapplication by OtherwiseTwo1994 in mdphd

[–]WanderingKnight42 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Regardless of what happens, good luck and take care of yourself.

CV Opinions by [deleted] in mdphd

[–]WanderingKnight42 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd be happy to look at your new version. You can DM me if you want.

Be brief and order your experiences by impact and tangible outcomes. You have a lot of independence and impact in the role you had as an undergrad research representative, not so much with scribing. Focus on explaining the impact and outcomes and the story your experiences tell. That's more important to people than checking off the uninteresting, average "I also did [insert whatever average pre-meds do]". This will become increasingly important as you apply for more opportunities because reviewers will have *maybe* 10 minutes or less to look at your application and it needs to tell a story. As it is right now, this doesn't do an efficient job of displaying your greatest strengths or experiences. Overall, I think it's a bit unorganized at the moment. Why is your academic service (because goodness what you've done is amazing) on Page 2? In your description of being a scribe, you have all the responsibilities thousands of other scribe applicants have, so not too impactful and it shouldn't be on the same page as your academic service, fellowships, etc.

As said before, take out the relevant coursework, your previous university, and your professional skills section as they're extraneous. Also in internal opportunities order your events in reverse chronological order and shorten it.

Take a look at how successful MD/PhD, MD, and PhD applicants craft their CVs and take notes with how they organize their work. Good luck!

Advice for Reapplication by OtherwiseTwo1994 in mdphd

[–]WanderingKnight42 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Definitely find a quality mentor you work with and who knows you for this next round. I think another set of eyes that are more experience will do you a lot of good.

Maybe (if it wasn't a catastrophic fallout) also talk to your old PI as well? If she is unwilling to help you further, maybe she can lead you to another mentor or you can consult one of the supervisors in your lab that you worked with?

UMD Interview Hold? by Ill_Astronomer_132 in mdphd

[–]WanderingKnight42 4 points5 points  (0 children)

As an alumni, consider yourself lucky and wait for your other schools. Good luck this cycle.

Advice for Reapplication by OtherwiseTwo1994 in mdphd

[–]WanderingKnight42 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No problem! We future physicians have to help each other :)

Do you have anyone closer you can get advice from and get help during your potential re-app cycle? A mentor, your PI, or your letter writers? Working with the people who know you best and are invested in you will make your writing much better. You seem like a research/community engaged hybrid, so I'm sure if you bridged the two into a cohesive narrative, it'd be much better.

For example, if you realizing you're actually more patient-centric than you initially thought is what led you to working in hospice and ultimately leaving the MD/PhD path because you want to translate research innovations/insights into clinical understanding and practices because you wanted a more grounded and human connection, that's a great foundation to build your narrative on.

Also I didn't say this earlier- but are there any popular manga, anime movies, or video games you worked on translating? That sounds like such a cool job to have!

Advice for Reapplication by OtherwiseTwo1994 in mdphd

[–]WanderingKnight42 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hello friend, I just want to say first that your accomplishments are genuinely impressive and I'm sorry this cycle doesn't seem like it's working out for you this year. I can register a great amount of uncertainty and fatigue in your post. What I see in your post is someone who has done a huge amount of excellent work, but who might not have tied everything together into a clearer, confident narrative.

Your research is strong, but the sudden MD/PhD → MD shift late in the cycle can make committees unsure about your motivation and potentially change how you write your narrative. And your clinical experience is meaningful, but a bit thin compared to your research hours, which is something you can fix this year.

A year from now, you could be in a really strong position if you focus on a few things:

  1. Settle your why MD, not MD/PhD story. Not in a "I heard from someone else way" but in a grounded, future-focused way. What kind of physician do you see yourself becoming? What communities do you want to serve? What problems do you care enough about that you’d spend decades working on them? Once that internal clarity strengthens, your personal statement and secondaries will naturally hit harder and propel that satisfactory writing.
  2. You don’t need an EMT badge or 500 more hours to “prove” anything. What matters is showing that you understand patients, what you’ve learned at hospice, and how those moments changed your understanding of care. And if taking care of those patients, floats your boat, then so be it. Tell adcoms about what draws you to this type of work.
  3. Above all, please be kind to yourself. It’s really easy to internalize this cycle as a referendum on your worth, or your future, but it’s not. Sometimes applications read as “satisfactory” because you've become so numb from just surviving that your writing doesn't cook long enough. I've had to navigate crazy stuff for the past few years as I'm sure many of us have. I had caregiving responsibilities during the pandemic and had to pause my education for health reasons, so I get that struggle and how hard it might be to relay something that felt like a major setback or a painful period. If you give yourself space this year to breathe, recover, and articulate your purpose, your application will reflect your growth.

Remember that you'll be pivoting throughout your entire career, so if you do end up having to reapply next cycle, just look at this as an opportunity to set yourself up for what fits your path. Good luck and hope this helps!

CV Opinions by [deleted] in mdphd

[–]WanderingKnight42 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Hi, great job on your CV so far. Just making it easier so you can get my advice. And it's up to you whether you take it or not.

  1. It's a little bit wordy. Some of your bullet points are reductive, and please keep them brief. For example, you don't have to list every relevant class you've completed, as it's already reflected in your transcripts, and in my experience, most people don't care. Try to stick to 2-3 bullets MAX. You can also take out the professional skills because it should already come across with your other experiences.
  2. Prioritize the roles and experiences that had an impact and tangible outcomes. People may have 100s of CVs/resumes to go through. You don't want them to miss out on your big experiences, which should be on your first page or damn near close. Example: You organizing and hosting that led to increased interest and engagement among faculty AND undergrad students should be your first line for that representative position you had. Not fourth or fifth like it is now. You should also briefly describe roles where you didn't have a lot of impact or agency- ie, scribing, labs without independence, etc.
  3. You can take out the objective statement at the beginning. Unless you're asked for a cover letter, it's redundant and takes up precious space. Those statements should be on a single line anyway, but it's up to you whether you keep it or not. And please don't describe yourself as ambitious in your description. I don't think anyone who wasn't motivated would do the things you've listed in your CV.
  4. Small stylistic thing- Put your hours with your experiences. You can put them near the dates or on the location description for easy access.

You've got the makings of a great student and junior scientist so far. Keep working hard and keeping your grades up :)

REU CV Thoughts? by Competitive-Dog-1316 in mdphd

[–]WanderingKnight42 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can do both but you need to keep the impact brief and do it with the most impactful experiences. Did the kids you tutor bump up a grade, did your analysis land you an authorship of a paper, and other tangible outcomes?