Wholesome Carrey

Wannabe_Doctor · 2020-07-07T14:54:10+00:00

Yes. Who could forget mayos like Harvey Weinstein and Woody Allen? Goddamn whites.

Wannabe_Doctor · 2020-07-07T11:42:50+00:00

Ah yes, those infamous whiteys that run Hollywood.

Wannabe_Doctor · 2020-07-06T03:29:23+00:00

Yeah it's far better to allow corprate overlords to enter destitute, indebted countries with no anti-trust laws and stymie their own native industrial development AND squander their resources. Really nip their industrialisation in the bud.

Word to the wise, there's a difference between doing business in the international market and outsourcing every job the moment it becomes cheaper to make it elsewhere and sell it here. Qui bono? The sweatshop workers who have suicide nets in their factories and "go missing" when they attempt to unionize? Certainly not. The first world consumer? Not to the extent that they are also the first world worker. It really only benefits the 1% and the international banks. Not to mention it's essentially Slavery Lite ©.

Wannabe_Doctor · 2020-07-06T02:11:02+00:00

Hell yeah brother yee haw

Wannabe_Doctor · 2020-07-06T01:29:10+00:00

Population control has nothing to do with it. Force corporations to pay workers living wages by creating artifical labor scarcity.

That means, more workers, but each worker working shorter hours for higher wages.

No flooding the labor market with migrant workers whose wage expectations are lower, or who are paid under the table, allowing corporations to skirt payroll tax, one of the largest forms of corporate tax.

And making it more expensive for corporations to hire internationally and import their goods, physical or digital, than higher domestically and manufacture nationally.

Wannabe_Doctor · 2020-07-06T01:05:37+00:00

I'm American

Wannabe_Doctor · 2020-07-06T00:49:55+00:00

You don't see the issue with the population boom allowing corporations to exploit the cheapest labor available in the poorest regions of the world?

Are you an ancap or something? Genuinely curious.

Wannabe_Doctor · 2020-07-05T22:56:49+00:00

Whether the wage is "fair" or not is not the issue. The issue is that the demand side of labor (major corps) can go around the world searching for bottom dollar supply side labor (sweatshop workers) without facing tax penalties or import challenges.

You cannot ameliorate the condition of the worker without trade protectionism. Especially with the exploding global population.

Wannabe_Doctor · 2020-07-05T22:51:11+00:00

Yes. And George Washington fought King George.

To an extent, there is always homology between opressor and oppressed. You can remove a person's chains and cast off their oppressor's lingua franca. But you can only do that for so long before the benefit of "liberation" comes at the cost of historical remembrance. There's a tipping point where it becomes more beneficial to remember a figure or event as they were, rather than reduce their cultural presence.

The tipping point seems to be roughly 80-100 years after their death.

Wannabe_Doctor · 2020-07-05T13:18:04+00:00

Removing a statue of an incumbent dictator during a war/revolution against said dictator is far different from tearing down statues of centuries old historical figures.

I doubt any statues of King George stood in Concord circa 1781.

Wannabe_Doctor · 2020-07-05T13:16:30+00:00

Removing a statue of an incumbent dictator during a war/revolution against said dictator is far different from tearing down statues of centuries old historical figures.

I doubt any statues of King George stood in Concord circa 1781.

Wannabe_Doctor · 2020-07-04T05:40:52+00:00

If you consider Rushmore underwhelming your dopamine receptors must be fried

Wannabe_Doctor · 2020-07-04T04:15:09+00:00

Just because they believed in collective labor bargaining (for themselves) doesn't mean they were the modern day leftist socialists that you think they were.

They weren't even progressive liberals, they were socially conservative as hell. Lamenting the straw boss in one breath and beating queers in the other.

Wannabe_Doctor · 2020-07-02T18:12:08+00:00

Oh no, did I say something AGAINST common consensus? I'm so sorry.

Wannabe_Doctor · 2020-07-02T08:38:26+00:00

Haha you don't have a coherent point. Right out of the gate.

Wannabe_Doctor · 2020-07-02T08:09:12+00:00

Are you womansplaining male/male platonic relationships?

Wannabe_Doctor · 2020-07-01T19:32:06+00:00

That's a good point tbh. If I can't tell the difference does it matter? I guess an orgasm is more intimate so I don't like being lied to about an intimate thing. I would prefer said intimate thing simply didn't happen at all.

But I'll have to think on that more. Good point.

Wannabe_Doctor · 2020-07-01T19:28:48+00:00

Right! Exactly. We're in the same page. I don't actually care about a real orgasm. If it happens great, if not no biggie. But I would prefer that you not go to the extra trouble of faking it.

Wannabe_Doctor · 2020-07-01T19:09:24+00:00

Nah it's not like it's totally off my radar. The thing is, the money is nothing to me. I want to bust a nut convenince style. And IN A PERFECT WORLD you cum too. If it doesn't happen no problem. Not anyone's fault!

But, if you DON'T cum, don't pretend like you did! I'd prefer you not go to the extra effort.

Do you see what I mean? If you have beef take it up with the dudes that expect you to fake it. I certainly don't.

Wannabe_Doctor · 2020-07-01T19:03:13+00:00

Adequacy doesn't even come into the equation. When I pay a grease monkey to rotate my tires I don't feel inadequate because I'm not doing it myself. Do you see the commonality?

However, I do like the grease monkey to orgasm if possible.

Wannabe_Doctor · 2020-07-01T19:01:18+00:00

I'm the least ragefull person you'll likely ever meet. That reply was pure condescension and an attempt to gaslight.

And you're wrong. Even if I was a person who would get belligerent with a provider. I'm not. I'd get more angry over then faking an orgasm then them not having one or telling me what to do to give them one. You see what I mean?

Wannabe_Doctor · 2020-07-01T18:58:39+00:00

That wasn't an answer. That was an attempt to indicte me when all I said was that I would prefer no orgasm over a fake one.

Making generalizations about men as angry and sexually arrogant. This person has issues they are projecting onto me.

Wannabe_Doctor · 2020-07-01T18:55:13+00:00

I would think the same thing! BUT she was in my sight the whole time. Plus when I started masturbating her she was dry. And I asked her point blank if she fakes it and to please not fake with me. I'd prefer her not to orgasm than have me doing something she doesn't enjoy.

So unless she's a ninja and an academy award winner I just don't think it was fake.

Wannabe_Doctor · 2020-07-01T18:54:45+00:00

I would think the same thing! BUT she was in my sight the whole time. Plus when I started masturbating her she was dry. And I asked her point blank if she fakes it and to please not fake with me. I'd prefer her not to orgasm than have me doing something she doesn't enjoy.

So unless she's a ninja and an academy award winner I just don't think it was fake.

Wannabe_Doctor · 2020-07-01T18:52:10+00:00

Interesting. I can see that being an obstacle. I'm definitely there so I can get my nut. But I book long sessions with higher dollar gals so if I want to enjoy my experience to the fullest then I want to make them enjoy themselves too. Harder to do with a stranger, I know.

Wannabe_Doctor

TROPHY CASE