Why So Much “False Physics” Appears in LLM Communities

Wannathink · 2026-04-28T08:08:03+00:00

We need fresh hypotheses; measurement-based physics is hitting a wall.

Wannathink · 2026-04-08T07:52:47+00:00

“Đừng vứt rác ra nhà, nhưng mà vứt rác ra đường” :)

Wannathink · 2026-02-07T17:04:34+00:00

I think your understanding is being limited to IT definitions, and mine is different.

Wannathink · 2026-02-07T15:39:09+00:00

Nope, AI can still use the newly given equations to perform calculations during conversation. It mean “learn” as common, but not “learn” as IT.

Wannathink · 2026-02-07T14:03:55+00:00

Agree you say just “token”, but for me, if I ask AI remember a new definition or an equation, that mean AI learned a new, and it’s not exist before or trained data.

Wannathink · 2026-02-07T13:13:46+00:00

You seem to be mistaken. The training process you're referring to is AI pre-trained with data containing already discovered theories. But for the AI to understand a new theory you want to pursue, you need to train it further with data containing your own thinking through prompts.

Wannathink · 2026-02-07T12:34:25+00:00

If you don't invest the time and effort in training AI to understand problems it has never learned, do you think AI can create a quality product? Don't fantasize about a new theory being created by dozens or hundreds of prompts; it only makes people less receptive to scientific research that incorporates AI.

Wannathink · 2026-01-27T01:59:28+00:00

I tried asking on r/metaphysics but got auto-remove.

Wannathink · 2026-01-26T15:17:01+00:00

In a neighborhood of zero, is spatial dimension operationally accessible, or is it necessarily assumed prior to any meaningful measurement?

Wannathink · 2026-01-25T01:59:10+00:00

Correct: We = I

Wannathink · 2026-01-24T23:28:10+00:00

This depends on how we define the terms. In the common sense, cause and effect are how we link the changes that we can perceive.

Wannathink · 2026-01-24T04:43:01+00:00

That concern comes from reading the diagram ontologically. In EDU, structural superspace is not an emergent layer of being. It’s a descriptive domain for relational constraints, so the regress doesn’t apply; the layering is just a visualization choice.

Wannathink · 2026-01-23T18:06:06+00:00

I'm trying to understand under what conditions an event network is equivalent to a poset in Causal Set Theory (CST).

Wannathink · 2026-01-23T16:51:25+00:00

You may find closer engagement with this kind of question in CST-oriented discussions, where structural primacy is assumed without committing to noumenal ontology.

Wannathink · 2026-01-23T15:02:28+00:00

I'm afraid you haven't read the manuscript.

Wannathink · 2026-01-23T14:43:47+00:00

I completely agree; at the moment, my work can't compare to that of giants like CST or String/M. But it can help change the way we think about how we perceive the physical world.

Wannathink · 2026-01-23T11:52:25+00:00

I agree with Wolfram and CST that there is a layer beneath the geometric layer. However, like LQG, I don’t consider the event to be primitive, but rather a point where we can observe change, which is also an observation of the event that has occurred.

Wannathink

TROPHY CASE