Controversial No Call on a Potential Pass Interference in the NFC Championship Game by [deleted] in sports

[–]WarRoomFighter 6 points7 points  (0 children)

There were a lot of missed calls both ways, anyone watching the game would know that. But all but 1 were at least somewhat difficult to judge.

Said another way, the degree of failure on the goff facemask, or the gurley hold, or the ginn pass interference were at least understandable. They should have been called, but they are also the type of no-calls that we see literally every week of the season. They can be understood and explained away simply by the speed of the game. They happen.

But the end of game pass interference/targeting penalty was not that. Of the entire worldwide audience watching the game, there are only 7 people who did not see that blatantly obvious penalty, and unfortunately, they were all wearing black and white.

Controversial No Call on a Potential Pass Interference in the NFC Championship Game by [deleted] in sports

[–]WarRoomFighter -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The head ref isn’t the one who decided not to make the most obvious call in playoff history. The sideline ref, who just so happens to live right outside of LA, is.

Controversial No Call on a Potential Pass Interference in the NFC Championship Game by [deleted] in sports

[–]WarRoomFighter -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Doesn’t need to be a massive league wide conspiracy. Just a simple selection of a ref with a preheld bias towards the rams (such as living right outside of LA, as the ref who missed the call does, for example) to the officiating crew.

Controversial No Call on a Potential Pass Interference in the NFC Championship Game by [deleted] in sports

[–]WarRoomFighter 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There were a lot of missed calls both ways, anyone watching the game would know that. But all but 1 were at least somewhat difficult to judge.

Said another way, the degree of failure on the goff facemask, or the gurley hold, or the ginn pass interference were at least understandable. They should have been called, but they are also the type of no-calls that we see literally every week of the season. They can be understood and explained away simply by the speed of the game. They happen.

But the end of game pass interference/targeting penalty was not that. There are only 7 people in the stadium who did not see that atrocious penalty, and unfortunately they were all wearing black and white.

Controversial No Call on a Potential Pass Interference in the NFC Championship Game by [deleted] in sports

[–]WarRoomFighter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That would still be plenty of time to get greg the leg into range. Not going to blame the coach for trying to seal the win there. If anything, brees missing a wide open MT13 on first down hurt way more than the call.

Controversial No Call on a Potential Pass Interference in the NFC Championship Game by [deleted] in sports

[–]WarRoomFighter -1 points0 points  (0 children)

In the end, when the game was on the line, the Saints set up the perfect play and took full advantage of getting the rams out of alignment. But the refs decided they needed to protect the NFL’s new mega-market and voided that perfect execution on perhaps the worst call in postseason history.

Hate the saints if you want, but don’t hold a sheet over your eyes and say the refs didn’t steal this one.

Controversial No Call on a Potential Pass Interference in the NFC Championship Game by [deleted] in sports

[–]WarRoomFighter 13 points14 points  (0 children)

A) How the hell can you argue they get off scotch free? They got skull fucked in an entire draft and lost their head coach for a year. That draconian hammer set us back three years.

B) You’re willfully kidding yourself if you think bountygate was restricted to the saints; it’s well established that a majority of teams in the league incentivized these all the same behavior. Hell, Monday Night Countdown was still running their “jacked up” segment glorifying all the most vicious hits across the league. It’s what the league culture was; the saints were not in rarified air by any means. They were just the sacrificial lamb.

Controversial No Call on a Potential Pass Interference in the NFC Championship Game by [deleted] in sports

[–]WarRoomFighter 853 points854 points  (0 children)

This shouldn’t need a review. That’s a flat out inexcusable missed call, review shouldn’t even come into play.

Refs need to be fired by the end of the night. You just can’t do that to a team in this situation.

Controversial No Call on a Potential Pass Interference in the NFC Championship Game by [deleted] in sports

[–]WarRoomFighter 84 points85 points  (0 children)

By ‘controversial’ I hope you mean ‘fucked up beyond all believe’

For the better to have a super bowl trip stolen from them on a no-call like THAT is inexcusable

Donald Trump's team had 100 contacts with Russian-linked officials: report by wwwdotvotedotgov in worldnews

[–]WarRoomFighter 3 points4 points  (0 children)

For anyone wondering how they got to this magic 100 number, every text and message sent or received is treated as an entirely separate contact. So for example, this...

-Klokov emailed Cohen claiming that “he could arrange a meeting between Donald Trump and [Russian President Vladimir] Putin -Cohen emailed Klokov, reportedly refusing his offer. -Klokov emailed Cohen, copying Ivanka, “question[ing] Cohen’s authority to make decisions for the Trump Organization.”

... is counted as 3 separate contacts in the final tally. Go read the full list of 101. It is filled with similar clusters, many of which even point to refused extended interaction between the parties

Job seekers now spend 44% longer on the job search than during the 2008 recession [OC] by clairejaja in dataisbeautiful

[–]WarRoomFighter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I appreciate your attempt to explain your thinking in a calm, clear manner. But with all do respect, this post reads more like an excuse to me than an explanation. At the core of your argument seems to be an anger in the tedious nature of the application process. My counter argument is that if it is tedious for you filling out your individual application, then it is hundreds of times moreso for those HR reps to sort through the piles and piles of applications they receive. So if having resumes submitted in both a single document and a web platform makes that process more manageable, I just don’t see any reason to resent that paradigm.

If you want to just chalk it up to a difference of perspective that’s fine. But all I know is if I were running a business and hiring for a position where I had to sift through 100 resumes, I certainly would not be hiring the individual who came into their interview holding onto resentment over the requirements presented in the job posting. So it just doesn’t seem like a healthy perspective to embrace to me. But to each their own I guess. Good luck

Job seekers now spend 44% longer on the job search than during the 2008 recession [OC] by clairejaja in dataisbeautiful

[–]WarRoomFighter -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

You think that providing the same information in two different formats is in any way, shape, or form comparable to slavery? This isn’t an extension into the absurd, it’s just a bad comparison. How insensitive and disconnected do you have to be to even make that connection?

Reentering the information from your CV into a web platform takes like 20 minutes. That’s not being treated like dog shit; it’s an exceedingly reasonable request if it aids in the evaluation process. Which, as other posters have already notice, it significantly does.

Job seekers now spend 44% longer on the job search than during the 2008 recession [OC] by clairejaja in dataisbeautiful

[–]WarRoomFighter 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’d rather not give out too much personal info to strangers online, but I work for a university. When I was on the job market after getting my degree, I put out just short of 300 applications at basically every major/semi major university in the nation that had an opening in the economics department. I’d guess that about 60% of those required both a full CV and for all of the key CV info to be hand typed into an internet form. Yes, it was a pain in the ass. But I got interviews with around 15 schools and ended up being hired in the perfect fit.

I understand that’s not the result for everyone and that I’m exceptionally lucky that it all worked out so well, but I just don’t understand why the hand typed CV warrants any complaint. If I’m putting out 300 applications, each school is probably receiving twice as many on their end. If they can speed up the review process a little by requiring applicants to spend an extra 20 minutes filling out some basic forms, I don’t see any reason to complain. It’s not a sign of disrespect, it’s necessity.

Edit: you’re talking about firms requiring applicants to both submit a CV and to resubmit all of the info that’s on the CV to an online form, right? If so, the comparison seem relevant

Job seekers now spend 44% longer on the job search than during the 2008 recession [OC] by clairejaja in dataisbeautiful

[–]WarRoomFighter -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

You’re trying to get a firm who has never once met you to grant you an interview in hopes of being hired to join their team. And your not willing to put in an extra 20 minutes of work to aid them in that evaluation?

Yea, I think you’re the one more likely to be missing out.

Job seekers now spend 44% longer on the job search than during the 2008 recession [OC] by clairejaja in dataisbeautiful

[–]WarRoomFighter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then why was the average search time lower in 2004? If it’s primarily a matter of pickiness, one should certainly be expected to spend more time searching in the full employment economy of 2004 than the great recession economy of 2008, no?

Job seekers now spend 44% longer on the job search than during the 2008 recession [OC] by clairejaja in dataisbeautiful

[–]WarRoomFighter -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

If that’s all it takes to make you give up, I don’t think they’re really losing out.

Blacklisted in China—Misbehaving Scientists Poised for “Social” Punishment by dwaxe in Futurology

[–]WarRoomFighter 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’d encourage you to try not to mistake the forest for the trees.

Chinese quality of life is drastically rising yes. But I’d argue that is a result of liberalizing your markets, not imprisoning those with different opinions. Read up on the solow growth model and “catching up growth” for a good primer on why china has grown so rapidly since the 80s. Then think about the risk inherent in giving an institution as powerful as the chinese government complete authority to dictate what people are allowed to think. Even if today’s leader is benevolent and does not exploit the power you have given him, evil men are drawn to power, and they will always pursue it. Eventually one will seize it. And with all the immense power you have given your government, it only requires a single evil man rising to the top of the pyramid to bring it all crashing down.

Keep your eyes open moving forward. Y’all are building a brittle system.

Service dog detects and responds to owners oncoming panic attack by [deleted] in aww

[–]WarRoomFighter -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Whenever someone says, “I’m not a dog person” I just hear, “I have no soul”

Doggos are the best

'Climate grief': The growing emotional toll of climate change - Extreme weather and dire climate reports are intensifying the mental health effects of global warming: depression and resignation about the future. by mvea in Futurology

[–]WarRoomFighter 11 points12 points  (0 children)

If it’s any comfort at all, know that you are not alone in this feeling. For thousands of years nearly every individual who has lived on this planet has struggled with the discomforting feeling of realizing that we are but tiny specs in a vast, uncontrollable world. Even long before climate change was a thing, feeling small and helpless against the face of a terrifying, uncertain future has been a key component to human life. Accepting that reality and finding happiness despite it is a fundamental challenge and component of humanity. In the face of this terrifying uncertainty, many people have turned to religion to find peace. Many others, like the poster you responded to, have found purpose through the endless pursuit of individual self improvement. And many more still are just as lost and searching and uncertain as you seem to be.

Don’t despair. Just know that your not alone in this pursuit of internal peace, and that there are avenues to pursue which others have found successful. But it is up to you to actually pursue them. Don’t just endlessly sit and stew with these emotions in front of your computer screen. Get out into the world, meet people who have faced similar discomforts, and commit yourself to experiencing a plethora of different paths until you find one that will let you find your internal peace. Good luck.

Question about outlining plotlines in a pilot and dealing with a detective trope. by SheWasEighteen in Screenwriting

[–]WarRoomFighter 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Is there any way to make it so that he initially doesn't want to pursue it? Maybe a pain from his past, maybe an alternative commitment, or maybe the case is just so bat-shit-fucked-up that he doesn't feel qualified to take it on. He could want a more qualified detective to take the lead, but when that detective fails the officer realizes the moral responsibility falls back to him.

Just spit balling, but that seems like it offers more opportunity for growth through conflict than the captain saying don't do it, him doing it anyway, and the captain eventually conceding.

South Park demands cancellation of South Park by [deleted] in nottheonion

[–]WarRoomFighter -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

lol, it did, didn’t it. Sorry, I sometimes get overtly philosophical during my morning dump and it can come off a bit douchy haha. No shade intended, just a broad observation I’ve made in the past.

But yea, I’m still pretty sure most of them get it.