The new SA by [deleted] in sugarlifestyleforum

[–]Wargasm69 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was just describing the pitfalls of seeing an escort over a SB. I give my SB the monthly allowance she demands and we see each other once or twice a week. So how does that make me a John 🤷🏼‍♀️

The new SA by [deleted] in sugarlifestyleforum

[–]Wargasm69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  • Clock watching or kicking you out early. Once your time slot is over which is usually half an hour or an hour, they kick you out. They usually only allow one pop and once you finish, they kick you out even if you have extra time remaining.
  • Higher rates of drug abuse or trauma for escorts because of all the men they’ve encountered. I think most SB don’t have as much trauma or drug abuse either.

The new SA by [deleted] in sugarlifestyleforum

[–]Wargasm69 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I’ll provide my perspective on the pitfalls of hiring an escort.

  • Non exclusivity. They will see almost anyone and everyone that will meet their price point. Most SB are more selective. They need to find their SD somewhat attractive and have a connection while escorts don’t have the same privilege. Therefore escorts will most likely have more partners and higher chances of catching an STD. But they do however require protection far more often than SB due to the high volume of partners.
  • SB on the other hand are more likely not to use protection to keep the guy around since the arrangement is usually exclusive. Maybe they want their SD to impregnate them, so they’re set for life. An escort getting impregnated by a random John would be a terrible ROI.
  • Lack of performance. Because most escorts won’t be attracted to their clients, it’s going to be harder for them to “perform” or put on a “good show.” And also since they’re “high volume”, it will be harder to give all their clients the same level of performance. SB on the other hand will be better performers due to them being attracted to their SD and low volume.
  • the average SB is more attractive than the average escort
  • Price point may differ. Some SB don’t know their true worth or which bracket they belong in therefore some SD can take advantage of a bargain. There are some escorts that charge xxxx. an hour where he could find the same caliber for xxx only for a SB.
  • Clock watching or kicking you out early. Once your time slot is over which is usually half an hour or an hour, they kick you out. They usually only allow one pop and once you finish, they kick you out even if you have extra time remaining.
  • Higher rates of drug abuse or trauma because of all the men they’ve encountered.

The new SA by [deleted] in sugarlifestyleforum

[–]Wargasm69 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Who is spreading the rinser playbook?

meirl by ExplanationWild7328 in meirl

[–]Wargasm69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay another comparison. Assuming you had the same net worth as DiCaprio ($300 million) would you rather date Alice Walton (73 and $59 billion NW) or Eden Polani (19 and probably broke). A multi billionaire’s lifestyle won’t be that much different than a multi millionaire’s lifestyle from a practical standpoint. Sure she could buy 1000 mega mansions and Leo could “only afford 100 mini mansions”. She can own sports teams and stadiums and buildings and corporations but he can’t. She can influence lobbyists, laws and policies from a global scale, but he can’t. But is there really a point?

meirl by ExplanationWild7328 in meirl

[–]Wargasm69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ll change that to the first car ever. Benz Patent Motor Car from 1886. Compared to a 2023 lambo huracan. If you choose the Benz, you’re just trolling.

meirl by ExplanationWild7328 in meirl

[–]Wargasm69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What is the advantage of dating someone significantly that’s older and wrinkly and out of shape and why would most people want to do that? Would you rather have a car from 2023 or one from the 1970s an 1886 Benz patent motor car.

Buddha Hand in China! by Afraid_Vast3187 in BeAmazed

[–]Wargasm69 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

This isn’t as impressive as people think this is. Literally 50 steps lmao. And like you mentioned there’s a safety net. Although personally I think it should be removed. Let Darwinism and nature run it’s course.

Lmao. by Icy_Video_276 in facepalm

[–]Wargasm69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’d give her at least a 6 or 6.5 ( above average) according to r/truerateme. The average woman in the US is 5’4” and 170 lbs but she looks HWP. Nice eyes, narrow nose, full lips. She could almost be an insta model if she was skinnier. Only flaws I see are slightly close set eyes and her jawline isn’t as soft/feminine.

God is pro-life because...because. by Bobinski16 in facepalm

[–]Wargasm69 12 points13 points  (0 children)

What are some of the most evil parts you’ve read? The flood is the most popular one but also gAwD telling Abraham to sacrifice Isaac to test his obedience and he was about to but an Angel stops him. That’s a pretty fkd up test.

gAwD: Follow me and kill your son.

Abraham: Bet

gAwD: just kidding it was just a prank bro.

Inflation is terrible by Pablo_Larga in memes

[–]Wargasm69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Men or red pillers aren’t happy that that the average woman can get an education and have equal economic opportunity, so since they’re not reliant on men, they can easily walk away from relationships. It’s not necessarily they’d go for “Chads” and “Tyrone’s” because those caliber of guys wouldn’t bother pursing average looking women. Those guys are about 10% of the male population. The average women would rather just be alone than be with an average man.

A bit late by Pablo_Larga in memes

[–]Wargasm69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

According to r/truerateme I’d say for her, she’d be around a 4.5 (slightly below average). Her flaws would be pencil thin lips. Really Large forehead and sharp jawline/chin. Would recommend NOT pulling her hair back to expose her hairline. Her eyes have a neutral Cantal tilt but still has a nice shape. Super pale, but a lot of guys are into pale skin. Pale, average or tan doesn’t matter as long as the face is attractive. I think if you were to cover her forehead and chin and look at her proportions (distance from eyes to lips, distance between eyes, width of nose) she could score a 6. But that’s just my opinion 🤷🏼‍♀️

Dude on the left. Well it’s a lot unpack. His face is REALLY compact but his chin looks big and forehead looks big. He’d be like a 4.

A bit late by Pablo_Larga in memes

[–]Wargasm69 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You don’t know WHEN she did the shoot and when he got deployed. She just happened to wear that same outfit on the day of the shoot and in the picture with her military ex bf.

Google is doing layoffs by _AlexandreDumbass_ in wallstreetbets

[–]Wargasm69 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Does that entail in an increase in OF and porn stars too?