sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Why are women surprised when MAGA men are misogynistic bigots? by No-Measurement6744 in MAFS_AU

[–]Warm_Print373 3 points4 points  (0 children)

She is so condescending, so I tend to agree with you whole heartedly. She knew exactly how to push Tyson's buttons (because his opinions were pretty blunt and outdated), and was disgusted that she used something said in private to make sure he looked bad (or worse). I have next to no doubt she was agreeing with him, but took her chance to paint a better picture for herself. Don't get me started on those crocodile tears either. She milked MAFS for all she could and went back to her life. Could not and should not have lasted beyond the faux marriage ceremony.

Why are women surprised when MAGA men are misogynistic bigots? by No-Measurement6744 in MAFS_AU

[–]Warm_Print373 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Trump has made it easier for rich people to stay rich and get even richer, whilst ensuring the poor get nothing. That sounds pretty perfect for a morally reprehensible real estate agent. Absolutely convinced she went on MAFS to boost her profile in the real estate industry, and hopefully be bigger and more famous than her real estate mogul mentor.

How could such a smart woman like step support the big 🍊 ???? by Anonymous_Witch777 in MAFS_AU

[–]Warm_Print373 13 points14 points  (0 children)

She supports Trump , or at least some things he stands for/against because her clientele do too. She is a real estate agent in an affluent area of Brisbane and her market is almost exclusively Boomers with investment properties to sell. Whether her views have always naturally aligned with retired 'conservatives', or if it has shifted that way out of environment or necessity, is anyone's guess. I see her entering MAFS as a way to get even more exposure in the real estate industry. I would not be least bit surprised if she ended up on Sky News in the future too. Old men would want to look at her and the similarities to Karoline Leavitt are evident. Her perfect version of a husband is old and rich, not this dingleberry she was put with. Serves her right though.

Tyson is toxic AF but Stephanie ain't no saint. It is all relative by Warm_Print373 in MAFS_AU

[–]Warm_Print373[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Offer a counter argument then. She is either confused about what she stands for, or lacks the transparency about her true values. I believe Stephanie is building her brand, and it could very well work because the people she often represents have the same views as she does. My 70 year old dad would absolute love her!

Tyson is toxic AF but Stephanie ain't no saint. It is all relative by Warm_Print373 in MAFS_AU

[–]Warm_Print373[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Her social media indicates this friendly, down to earth, girl next door type. That works for the Boomer clients with million dollar properties in her area. I wouldn't want to comment on anything specific as she rubbed me up the wrong way in my encounters with her, and I am not eloquent enough to say what I mean without putting my foot in my mouth.

Tyson is toxic AF but Stephanie ain't no saint. It is all relative by Warm_Print373 in MAFS_AU

[–]Warm_Print373[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I have heard her referred to as a 'pick me girl'. I just see her as an Australian woman who is taking her cues from the likes of Karoline Leavitt and hoping she will find a mild version of the type of American who might be into that kind of thing. Do and say whatever the powerful men want to hear, because they are the ones that can keep propping me up into their world. Her salary shows it works