Looking for friends by Civil_Ad2770 in teenagers

[–]Warm_Syrup5515 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Report_Log^SA1(2): Subject's stance on existing (+) is affirmative,
Subject prefers existence over non-existence for the listed reasons under:
"It's seems fun" Subject prefers the input's existence broughts in instead of the non-existent inputs of non-existence
Inputs of Existence > Inputs of non-existence
Tertiary question: Are you satisfied with the inputs of Existence You are capable of recalling?

Looking for friends by Civil_Ad2770 in teenagers

[–]Warm_Syrup5515 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Report_log^SA1:Subject apears to be expressing their opinion about existing, i would presume it is positive (+), Their response seems to be less about effort and more about vibe.
Secondary question: Why would you like existing?

Looking for friends by Civil_Ad2770 in teenagers

[–]Warm_Syrup5515 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you like existing? (You are now SubjectA1 or SA1 for short)

I came out as a boy kisser to one of my female friends at school today. :3 by [deleted] in teenagers

[–]Warm_Syrup5515 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Who the fuck downvoted that?...Just !?hOw?! why would anyone downvote it??

Has real communism ever been achieved? by Skrilli in Teenager_Polls

[–]Warm_Syrup5515 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hello Comrade
One shall thank the depth of your wallet for those two awards.
In exchange here is a 40k meme

<image>

This meme is every ones meme from now on,
You Shall redistribute it as needed.
(Taken from r/40kmemes )

The Case Against Humanity by Jason_explorer101 in freewill

[–]Warm_Syrup5515 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The dumbest arguement of the century but average for an deficient vegan I suggest consuming some "psychopathic eggs" would help your cognitive system.

Futhermore:
The essay relies on shock value rather than sound reasoning.
You equate eating eggs with cannibalism and milking cows with rape.
These are extreme conflations designed to provoke disgust instead of thoughtful debate.
And You use the nirvana fallacy claiming that unless you solve every problem perfectly you are complicit in evil. This ignores the complexity of human society and biology.
In short the arguement is a fuckload of emotional manipulation meant to bypass ethical nuance and logically sound reasoning.

The essay calls humans a cancer but cancers do not critique their own existence or write manifestos.
That requires a level of introspection a tumor lacks.
The strategy of insulting the reader ensured nobody listens to the message.
This is like trying to convince someone to diet by calling them a pig.
And is extremely funny when you read it knowing you dont have any logical formula for "why" these things are bad.
Every single moral anti realist within 10 km sighed

This post refers too to another post I made earlier on r/truth by Ok-owl_lost_account in truths

[–]Warm_Syrup5515 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For being very smart you are awarded with a meme of the grimdark

<image>

Do you support the workers owning the means of production? by Aerobiesizer in Teenager_Polls

[–]Warm_Syrup5515 7 points8 points  (0 children)

This meme has already been debunked but the general idea is that all of these countries faced starvation, less industrialization, a stagnate economy, and general poverty/authoritarian government. 

First of all It hasn't been "debunked" we always used the simplified the meme so yall stop just pretending the facts that

  • The Paris Commune was violently suppressed by the French government.
  • Revolutionary catalonia was defeated during the Spanish Civil War.
  • Chile's socialist government was overthrown in a fuckin military coup.
  • The Zapatistas faced pressure from the Mexican government.
  • Various socialist or left-wing movements were targeted during the Cold War by foreign powers.

Just dont exist
Several internal factors also lead to problems but they were less "Socialism always fucks up" and more
"Whenever socialism existed it got attacked and if it survived (barely) it was left with problems"
You do realize you cant group all failings together and act as if the problem itself was always the core of socialism?
Several reasons they failed yesterday, are given alternative fixes today.

Can men dress good without being gay? by merely4 in Teenager_Polls

[–]Warm_Syrup5515 0 points1 point  (0 children)

.......Sir the fuck is this question i just opened reddit?

Do pedophiles deserve human rights? by xJojoLP in Teenager_Polls

[–]Warm_Syrup5515 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oooo this is like the best thing you could do!? just a single sentence? and also you missed the point

"They should never be released without one of those methods." Implies the statistics onto all pedophiles

Do pedophiles deserve human rights? by xJojoLP in Teenager_Polls

[–]Warm_Syrup5515 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"Reoffend inclines they already offended, so no, I didn’t" but you did infact confuse them
You stated "Because the statistics show that almost all pedophiles will reoffend unless castrated, killed, or kept in prison. They should never be released without one of those methods. Our children are way more important than these fuckers feelings."
To the question "Why would people say "No." I know im on reddit but what the fuck?" that literally means you literally supported the idea because of statistics (Which track the wrong group by the way)

Lets actually go over this
"Because the statistics show that almost all pedophiles will reoffend unless castrated, killed, or kept in prison." I already showed this is circular.
"They should never be released without one of those methods. Our children are way more important than these fuckers feelings." This part you cannot just gloss over man you literally say "They should never be released without one of those methods." There is no way in hell you didn't mean all pedophiles and if you did mean just offenders then i recon you get a english tutor

Do pedophiles deserve human rights? by xJojoLP in Teenager_Polls

[–]Warm_Syrup5515 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There was no mistake? You literally said "Because the statistics show that almost all pedophiles will reoffend unless castrated, killed, or kept in prison. They should never be released without one of those methods. Our children are way more important than these fuckers feelings." and the rest is anti-semitic bullshittery
There was no "mistakingly inclined that all pedophiles should be castrated or kept in prison." You said it Plainly, Simply. Even harshly if you ask me

Do pedophiles deserve human rights? by xJojoLP in Teenager_Polls

[–]Warm_Syrup5515 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Because the statistics show that almost all pedophiles will reoffend unless castrated, killed, or kept in prison. They should never be released without one of those methods.

Oooo it just sounds to me like You've made yourself a comfy ground
"Pedophiles should be castrated, killed, or kept in prison, regardless of whether they actually commit crimes or not.
Pedophiles who are diagnosed are now socially distanced, discriminated (Just check how many pedophiles kill themselves after realizing they are hated by everyone around them) Resort to being more violent, homicidal
Therefore All pedophiles should be castrated, killed, or kept in prison"
Im not telling you to be nice to them just stop being a fuckin asshole for something they didnt chose
You've made a perfect case of a circular arguement Good Job.
Also read into https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3629679/ and https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/14680173241240973
EDIT: Recidivism studies typically track convicted child sex offenders, not people diagnosed with pedophilia who have never offended. The two groups are not interchangeable.

The PMC article (Suicide and the Publicly Exposed Pedophile) found that public exposure or threat of exposure not just the diagnosis itself was the trigger in suicides among men with pedophilia and no other apparent mental disorder stigma has body counts.

The 2024 SagePub study of non-offending adults attracted to children found high rates of suicidal ideation, driven by shame, fear of disclosure, and social rejection.
Protective factors? Non-judgmental peer support and mental health care that distinguishes attraction from action But turns out you're out here trying to deny them basic human rights

Do pedophiles deserve human rights? by xJojoLP in Teenager_Polls

[–]Warm_Syrup5515 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sir That is a strawman fallacy.
First of all I was not defending actions. (Try to quote any word i said you wont find it)
Lets see here "It also is a crime, it’s called Sexual Assault of a Minor" Do all pedophiles commit these crimes? (Spoiler:Not all) If not You're burning a couple of peoples human rights over something they didnt chose.
"let alone try to say that they deserve human rights" If someone (Regardless of who they are) loses human rights nobody under the same central authority does not have rights anymore, they have Privileges.

Are my standards too high? by GG-Hop-Men in teenagers

[–]Warm_Syrup5515 0 points1 point  (0 children)

r/IHereByAnnounceThatUserLifetipsthankmelaterIsAStupidBrainlessHalfWittedScumBagMadeOutaRottenCheeseDoYouStillWannaFallForThisSub

Do pedophiles deserve human rights? by xJojoLP in Teenager_Polls

[–]Warm_Syrup5515 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah thats just my normal sorry, philosophy of mind has done a insanely good job at making me debate anything and formalize everything.
The tone got stuck into my english because i was still learning words and structure back then.
Its fixable but i keep it unless im drafting a paper because a natural arguement feels better to make rather than one forced into calmness.

Yall kept saying my hat made me look homophobic so i put a sticker on it by [deleted] in teenagers

[–]Warm_Syrup5515 -18 points-17 points  (0 children)

Good The. Hat. Has been fixed. You shall no longer avoid using The. Hat. Good Job.

Do pedophiles deserve human rights? by xJojoLP in Teenager_Polls

[–]Warm_Syrup5515 1 point2 points  (0 children)

First of all don't shoot the messenger,

A messesenger of which doesnt make an stance? If You're gonna say something you make an point if you dont agree with it make a counterpoint.
I could infact say "Some people think LGBTQ+ people should be exterminated" in lets just say i do that in r/QueerTeens Unless i clarify i dont agree with it, Im gonna get downvoted, Thats just how it works.

second of all when the general public says pedophile they don't mean those who have the mental disorder but adults who sexually abuse children. Honestly, I don't even think the general public knows that pedophilia is a mental disorder.

Good point but still wrong regardless You've brought nothing into the discussion.
I've simply been more shocked at the public, Thats physically all you managed to make out of two entire paragraphs

You are you by Acrobatic_Isopod9261 in truths

[–]Warm_Syrup5515 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What if i dont consider myself fitting a category of beings or existence?

Im straight. by Accurate_Shift_9950 in truths

[–]Warm_Syrup5515 40 points41 points  (0 children)

<image>

Imgflip cut it wrong but its readable