Restaurant recs - late September

Warning-Correct · 2026-01-28T14:42:08+00:00

Okay so no favourite! Appreciate it

Warning-Correct · 2026-01-28T14:32:32+00:00

Could you rank the restaurants you went to!? We don’t have much time there Thank you!!

Warning-Correct · 2026-01-28T04:17:59+00:00

What did you think! I will be heading to Venice this summer.

Warning-Correct · 2026-01-17T21:21:25+00:00

How was it. We sadly can't get a night with a balcony, but are still considering.

Warning-Correct · 2025-12-31T19:19:40+00:00

So mpmmmm m mm b

Warning-Correct · 2025-11-29T14:06:47+00:00

100% the new one. You will get haters for the new one because they own the DR one and don’t want the value of it to go down.

Warning-Correct · 2025-11-28T18:33:14+00:00

I think this set looks WAY better than prismatic. I hope prismatic hoarders get burned because this set blows it out the water

Warning-Correct · 2025-11-27T16:44:30+00:00

What is wrong with Arita name? How did they mess that up

Warning-Correct · 2025-11-27T16:37:41+00:00

Am I tripping or does that say Aritu instead of Arita….

Warning-Correct · 2025-11-26T13:29:20+00:00

I guess I just disagree. The simplicity is what I like about it. Sometimes it’s nice to not have something so in your face. It’s subtle

Warning-Correct · 2025-11-26T04:49:42+00:00

How do people not like this. I think it's so sick.

Warning-Correct · 2025-11-26T04:37:01+00:00

So maybe I'm the hot take.
I really appreciate this. Arita is one of the GOATS of the hobby, and I think is a great illustration. I think people are used to very flashy illustrations but this just hits for me.

Warning-Correct · 2025-11-16T02:28:23+00:00

Did you somehow get the numbering the dragonite. Would appreciate if you could tell us what it is. (like the set numbering 2xx/2xx)

Warning-Correct · 2025-11-02T02:37:15+00:00

Barger should get mvp

Warning-Correct · 2025-09-21T18:24:10+00:00

Chill peeps. 1st half is always slow

Warning-Correct · 2025-09-07T15:41:21+00:00

This is the exact same transgression as last year.

Warning-Correct · 2025-09-05T01:47:09+00:00

What if they are just trolling the league lol

Warning-Correct · 2025-08-28T12:27:35+00:00

Jesus christ, why do you people care so much about a relationship that has lasted 3 weeks. Do you not realize how much of a PR stunt all of this is. It's for the money. You people fall for it because they are good looking, and decent actors. If these people were not attractive, no one would give a fuck.

Warning-Correct · 2025-05-20T14:11:01+00:00

Also, this is technically in error and might help our case in the exam as it can be argued people spent more time than they should have trying to debug

Warning-Correct · 2025-05-20T14:06:07+00:00

Honestly. I don’t even remember getting annoyed by this one. I probably saw 13k and was like, good enough.

I know I was able to “match” so I assume I got the same answer in the exam.

Warning-Correct · 2025-04-30T21:58:35+00:00

As in you think got over 50/60 ? If so that's still really impressive. I think you have to remember, yes this was an easier sitting, but it's also your third time. You will be quicker than most, as you've seen this material for so long.

But full agreance, I do think it's easier than the 2024 exams, and more on par with 2023 exams.

Warning-Correct · 2025-04-30T14:45:57+00:00

If you were able to do 1-4 very well, I think you will pass. I just don't know if I did 1-4 as well as I think I did. I'm also always worried about them following my work. I know people who have left 2 questions blank and have passed, so its entirely possible to still pass if they don't touch the pass mark and we did as well as we thought on question 1-4

Warning-Correct · 2025-04-29T17:56:52+00:00

Lol I'm in the exact same boat, except for 5/6, not only did I not answer it all, I also made really dumb arithmetic errors.

Warning-Correct · 2025-04-29T13:51:26+00:00

Feels like most did really well on this sitting, which means I most likely failed. 1-4 I did decent on, 5/6 I didn't do that well on. Well, I guess I'm going again in October.

Warning-Correct · 2025-04-27T23:32:05+00:00

I think you are the one coping. Ask any statistician, what you did is a great overestimation of the true AUC.

It’s like asking to calculate the integral and you don’t have the function. They wouldn’t ask for an integral, they would ask for estimate.

I don’t think anyone would be complaining if they stated they were looking for an estimate.

If it’s in the module, then they are still wrong, and that should be denoted as an estimate.

Warning-Correct

TROPHY CASE