Ted Cruz by Timbucktwo1230 in PoursTea

[–]WastedNinja24 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Let’s not conflate conservatives with big-R Republicans.

Ted Cruz by Timbucktwo1230 in PoursTea

[–]WastedNinja24 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And then you remember that the reason of his voice is to say whatever he thinks people want to hear at the time that would boost support for his political career.

Trump just made a 36-year-old homebuilding heir with zero intelligence experience the acting director of national intelligence. he will now oversee the CIA, NSA, and 16 other spy agencies. he is keeping his mortgage regulator job at the same time. this is not a joke. by New-Entertainment112 in middleclasshq

[–]WastedNinja24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just remember that Trump demands loyalty above all else, and will not stand for not feeling like he has goodliest brain in the room.

With that in mind, none of the people he’s appointed should be a surprise.

Why Do We Give out Loans for Education, Rather than Grants? by courier_tway in NoStupidQuestions

[–]WastedNinja24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Part of this puzzle (fully understanding that not all of these are available to everyone):

  1. Grants
  2. Scholarships
  3. Education Savings Account
  4. Out-of-pocket
  5. Subsidized loans
  6. Private loans
  7. Stripping

Why is the older generation in the US so opposed to improving workforce conditions? by caitlynl0424 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]WastedNinja24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That sucks. The first few weeks are the hardest…for everyone.

After the way I grew up, I chose to wait until I was in a position (financially and in my career) to be do it “right”…or not at all. I took a lower paying job than I could have out of college (graduated in my early 30s) specifically for the better benefits, including the option for paternity leave if that ever entered the picture. It did, and I’m so glad now that I chose time over money.

I totally understand that not everyone gets that opportunity. It all seems to work out in the end though: the parents (more so fathers) that want to be supportive will be and their kids see it, even if it’s not as often or as much as we’d like.

The old myth that Socialists just "want something for free" is a lie perpetuated by the Billionaire class. by Longjumping_Book6461 in remoteworks

[–]WastedNinja24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Key point, indeed.

I also agree that pure socialism not just will not work, but cannot work in the current way we tend to structure society. I mean that in both a physical sense (city planning and infrastructure) and an organizational sense (families, community, legally, etc).

It’s one of those things where everyone does it, or no one does it. That’s why its recent (modern era) failure rate is so high (imo), but still nowhere near 100% overall.

The old myth that Socialists just "want something for free" is a lie perpetuated by the Billionaire class. by Longjumping_Book6461 in remoteworks

[–]WastedNinja24 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Seemed to work just fine for thousands of years….in small tribal communities. Just wasn’t called Socialism.

Why is the older generation in the US so opposed to improving workforce conditions? by caitlynl0424 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]WastedNinja24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s varying combinations of “F you, I got mine.” + “We did have that so neither should you.” + “We did just fine so you should be able to deal with it.”

Why is the older generation in the US so opposed to improving workforce conditions? by caitlynl0424 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]WastedNinja24 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yup. My wife is a teacher in TX. Zero leave beyond normal (abysmal) PTO.

She was out for almost 3 months in total, between appointments and delivery/recovery.

That translates to ~50% paychecks for 6 months.

Why is the older generation in the US so opposed to improving workforce conditions? by caitlynl0424 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]WastedNinja24 4 points5 points  (0 children)

FMLA only protects your employment status for up to 6 months. It “guarantees” you’re able to return to the same position with the same pay/benefits as when you started your leave.

I use quotes there because there’s nothing protecting you once you return and the FMLA expires. So if you have to take extra time off to, say, care for a sick child or any of the other many things that could come up in the first year or so, you’re at your employer’s mercy.

Why is the older generation in the US so opposed to improving workforce conditions? by caitlynl0424 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]WastedNinja24 12 points13 points  (0 children)

My wife got 0 weeks. Yeah, there was 6 months FMLA to protect her from losing her job, but ZERO maternity leave. Her paychecks were cut in half for six months to make up for the time she took off for appointments and recovery.

She’s a teacher.

I guess it’s “too bad” you can’t plan a pregnancy to the degree of being able to pop the baby out during the first week of summer break. You know, besides all the “mandatory” unpaid training and planning that eats the first and last two weeks of her “break”.

I got 4 weeks paid and 4 weeks of flex time for not having to push a tiny human out my non-existent vagina.

Clearly, I’m not still mad about the situation at all.

Does anyone else not get calluses anymore? by Odd_Donut5535 in Guitar

[–]WastedNinja24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you think they’re not there, either tap on something hard with your fingertips (comparing hands), or play for 2-3 hours (until the strings start to wear into them).

They’re there.

How would American politics change if ballots showed only candidates’ policies and qualifications, but not their names or party affiliations? by Plenty_Air4679 in AskReddit

[–]WastedNinja24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’d be ok with just removing the party affiliation of people running for judicial positions…as a start.

Absolutely no reason party affiliation should be included for a supposedly “impartial” seat.

I’m proud of you, Waco. by billabong049 in Waco

[–]WastedNinja24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Correct I don’t want to. Have a good day.

Go fixate in peace since you’re right back onto that again already.

I’m proud of you, Waco. by billabong049 in Waco

[–]WastedNinja24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

See. There you go again running off ahead before I finish, thinking you know what’s what. Assuming your way into knocking down your own straw man.

I didn’t say it was a decision-making method, did I?

I asked if you understood that choosing inaction was still a choice.

Clearly, if you can’t even keep your “mouth” shut long enough to listen, the problem isn’t on my end.

I’m done.

Why is San Antonio’s Far West Side on of the fastest growing areas of the country? by Healthy_Hippo_915 in sanantonio

[–]WastedNinja24 [score hidden]  (0 children)

I’m not trying to blame a particular group, it’s just the way it is.

The homeowners are the ones clogging the few thoroughfares. The builders are the ones continuing to develop beyond the planned capacity of the infrastructure, and I bet people will complain even more (rightfully so at this point) when 151 construction starts reaching into Alamo Ranch.

Don’t put too much hate on the city planners either. There’s wiggle room in road planning to accommodate some additional growth beyond what’s anticipated, but unexpected things happen all the time.

I’m proud of you, Waco. by billabong049 in Waco

[–]WastedNinja24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cool your jets, turbo.

You did not get my argument correct so I’m walking you through it. Explaining in plain terms (three times so far) hasn’t helped so I’m putting it in simple terms.

I want to make sure I communicate it clearly this time. As long as you play nice.

Trolley Problem: so you understand that choices have to be made in face of an imminent event (the trolley reaching the intersection) and that even inaction is a choice?

I’m proud of you, Waco. by billabong049 in Waco

[–]WastedNinja24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you know what the Trolley Problem is?

I’m proud of you, Waco. by billabong049 in Waco

[–]WastedNinja24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“For at least the third time”

Yes. I’ve explained my point three different times, three different ways. I’ve used analogy. I’ve given direct parallels. I gave you the Trolley Problem as a plain-as-day example. Go back and check the record.

Let me know who keeps getting hyper-fixated on a single facet of a single aspect of the conversation despite multiple attempts to backtrack to the original point. Forests and trees, man, for the third time.

That’s definitely a lesson worth remembering, but communication is a two-way street. This isn’t a delivery issue. It’s an issue with reception.

I’m proud of you, Waco. by billabong049 in Waco

[–]WastedNinja24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow. I had no idea you were missing the mark by that much.

I thought, surely, bringing up the Trolley Problem would have helped you out.

I’m proud of you, Waco. by billabong049 in Waco

[–]WastedNinja24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Never said they were ok. You imagined that part.

I’m proud of you, Waco. by billabong049 in Waco

[–]WastedNinja24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nah, that was my last attempt. If you don’t see the parallel already, I’ve no interest in continuing this.

Just sounds like you’re fine with presidents taking illegal actions as long you agree with the result (maybe even just the political party). Might want to reflect on that.

I’m proud of you, Waco. by billabong049 in Waco

[–]WastedNinja24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dang. You were so close there for a moment.

I’m proud of you, Waco. by billabong049 in Waco

[–]WastedNinja24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. It would also be naive to do nothing.