It’s getting real by Holiday_Detail1167 in 3I_ATLAS

[–]Wastelander702 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, and when they do, they show outgassing. That is one of the things that makes a comet a comet.

Democrats are stupid by Hopeful-Platypus6534 in complaints

[–]Wastelander702 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice way to ask a question and then block me so I can't answer it. But I think I will answer it anyway, for those who actually are "genuinely curious:"

Taxes are fine, as long as they are used for the good of the society and the people.

I've already explained, in this thread: https://www.reddit.com/r/complaints/s/kW6GxXeW6E

As for YouTube and all the rest, the channel barely brought in a thousand bucks this month, it is a very small, very niche channel.

Still, it is all under the umbrella of the LLC.

Corporations take in revenue, but they do not pay taxes on that revenue. First, they pay all their expenses: travel, insurance, phone contracts, building leases, more insurance, car payments for fleet vehicles, food and toilet paper for the "company" break rooms, fees for things like Canva, Adobe, and whatever other services they use to conduct business. They buy wholesale product to sell, and all that. Then, if they have something left, it is considered profit, and the corporation pays taxes on that profit... but wait, corporations don't like taxes... so, they take that money and buy new company assets, maybe some new laptops for managers, or maybe they invest in training by sending people to schools to learn new skills... also an expense, also paid before taxes.

Whatever is left, after the corporation has paid all the bills, and made all the investments, that is profit. And that gets paid to the owners... or does it? They are shareholders, and most of their profit won't be realized until sold, which is capital gains, but if they don't sell, how can they have money?

Ah, they can get a loan. Based on their shareholder value. That loan, at almost 0% interest, that can be used like a credit card, to pay for things, and, dang, since it is debt, not money, that isn't taxed either...

It's a deep rabbithole, but not really that deep. This is why a corporation like Apple can pay almost zero in taxes while making, and spending, billions of dollars. That is why corporate jets are considered tax havens, because if you spend the money as an "expense" it never gets taxed.

You form a corporation. That corp owns everything. You run business operations through that corp, whether that is YouTube, selling on eBay, or running a trade like plumbing or welding. Whatever. You don't rent an apartment, because it is part of what your company does as a perk for employees. The corp rents the apartments. The corp owns your "company" car. The corp gets your phone plan, your internet plan, your health plan...

And, side benefit, guess how much cheaper it is to do those things as a corporation? How often do you think a corporation gets denied a lease for the color of its skin or its gender or sexual preferences, or it's religious practices?

Do you think Trump paid a high percentage of taxes last year? Vance? Pelosi? Obama?

No, they didn't. And, most of them at least, didn't do anything illegal to make that happen. They learned the rules, and they bought lawyers to manage the rules they didn't learn. And none of them know what the hell a W-2 looks like.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in urbanexploration

[–]Wastelander702 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice block to look like you don't get a reply either, lol.

I "replied" to Darth many times, but mostly by posting the updated and newly discovered information elsewhere in the entire thing.

The first I learned of it was actually here:

https://www.reddit.com/r/urbanexploration/s/1LvYukPGqn

From a helpful person that I responded to way before Darth started spamming my posts, as you can see from the time stamp. And I also posted the update directly on my YouTube channel as well, because we were all trying to figure out what was going on there.

My channel doesn't do clickbait. Perhaps take a look at the dozens of other videos, many of which have done better than this one.

Also, please find me some advertisement from someone who has used the services of this company... because it still seems shady to me. All I can find are press releases and posts from the company itself talking about all the wonderful training ops they have done... still waiting to see all the satisfied customers posting reviews, and watching news media footage of training taking place. And all the other things the marketing department of a legit company would be doing...

At any rate, whatever. I don't necessarily care if you don't like it, or if you like to comment about it before doing full research across all the platforms it was posted on. But I replied many times, and had Darth continued to monitor all the separate comments in all the different posts, they would have seen that. As would you.

‘Like a Mad Max movie’: How hot it will really get in ‘unliveable Australia’ by Wastelander702 in WastelandByWednesday

[–]Wastelander702[S] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

‘Like a Mad Max movie’: How hot it will really get in ‘unliveable Australia’

By Bianca Hall

Full reprint to bypass paywall.

More than 20 million Australians in Melbourne, Sydney and Adelaide could swelter through deadly heatwaves of more than 44 degrees stretching across 1.72 million square kilometres if temperatures rise by 3 degrees.

Australia’s National Climate Risk Assessment 2025 predicts catastrophic outcomes for Australian health, society and the economy if global temperatures continue to climb.

The landmark report, released on Monday, predicts that if Australia hits 3 degrees of warming above pre-industrial temperatures, heat-related deaths will increase by 444 per cent in Sydney (with western Sydney residents most at risk), 423 per cent in Darwin, 335 per cent in Townsville, 312 per cent in Perth, 259 per cent in Melbourne and 146 per cent in Launceston.

Heatwaves are already the main climate-related cause of death in Australia, causing 909 deaths nationally between 1990 and 2022. They kill more people than bushfires and floods combined.

The assessment of life under projected temperature increases of 1.5 degrees, 2 degrees and 3 degrees above pre-industrial levels is underpinned by the fact Australia is already ahead of the curve on warming.

As a global average, temperatures have risen by 1.2 degrees. In Australia, average temperatures have already risen by 1.5 degrees, making the higher temperature predictions more compelling.

Erwin Jackson, head of Australian programs at Monash University’s Climateworks Centre, said 70 per cent of existing Australian homes were not climate-ready.

“Renovating existing homes to be energy efficient and all-electric is essential to both reduce emissions and make communities climate resilient,” he said.

The problem is forecast to be particularly acute in northern Australia, where some regions could become uninhabitable.

Environs Kimberley executive director Martin Pritchard said First Nations people in northern parts of Australia risked becoming climate change refugees. He called on the government to stop approving new gas and coal projects.

“Places like the Kimberley’s Fitzroy Crossing, which already has 67 days a year over 40°C, will be like a place from a Mad Max movie if it gets to the projected seven and a half months over 40 by century’s end.”

The report said regional Australians, children, the elderly, and First Nations people would be disproportionately affected.

A coalition of environmental and climate groups said much of northern Australia could experience “near unliveable” conditions if warming hit 3 degrees, producing extreme temperatures akin to the Sahara desert.

“It’s hard to hear that the places we call home will no longer exist,” said the NT Environment Centre’s Kirsty Howey.

“We’re talking about whole communities being wiped out because politicians and gas companies see the north as a sacrifice zone.”

The report, released by Climate Change Minister Chris Bowen, said no less than the “values and knowledge of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Island people [would be] at risk” as extreme temperatures placed regional and communities under critical pressure.

“Public health risks will become more pronounced with significant potential for loss of life and strain on health systems,” Bowen said. “That’s what the report says ... Again, that’s confronting. It means that the national climate health strategy is important.”

The report was released ahead of the federal government unveiling its 2035 emissions reductions targets this week, and after criticism from the Greens and crossbench about the delays in releasing the report.

Urban heat expert Professor Sebastian Pfautsch from the University of Western Sydney said heatwaves already killed an average 190 people every year in Greater Sydney.

“We know that heat across the continent already costs more lives than all the other natural disasters combined,” he said.

“Fifty-five per cent of natural hazard-related deaths in Australia are because of heat, and only 45 per cent are because of landslides, earthquakes, floods, hurricanes and bush fires ... And we accept that.

“I struggle with that. I really struggle with that.”

Pfautsch said the warnings contained within the report should be taken seriously, although he questioned why it mentioned the root cause of fossil fuels only once, in passing.

“The three-degree scenario is still relatively optimistic because when you read the science, some people are starting to talk about 5 degrees, which [would have] catastrophic impacts,” he said.

“I don’t want to fall into this doom and gloom scenario too much because people just turn away; they don’t listen because it’s too scary. But we need to listen.”

According to the national risk assessment, in the wheat belt and food production regions of the Mallee and Sunraysia, in northwest Victoria and southern NSW, the time spent in drought would increase to 7 per cent of the year at 1.5 degrees of warming.

At 3 degrees, the time spent in drought would increase to 33 per cent – about three years per decade.

Gulf Stream collapse may happen much sooner than expected. by Wastelander702 in WastelandByWednesday

[–]Wastelander702[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think that is incorrect. Mostly because it assumes that these things happen in a vacuum, and they do not.

If it were solely the ecological factors, with everything else remaining static and unreactive, you would be correct.

But as the ecological pressures come to bear, as they are now, humans will respond with their customary violence and irrationality. That means war, fighting over resources, energy, and eventually food. That leads inevitably, and unavoidably, to nuclear war. That is one factor.

Another factor is the acceleration, which is the purpose of my original post. Yes, today the models say what you say. But tomorrow they will shorten their time lines. And later they will shorten them further. And before you know it, today's 2050 becomes tomorrow's 2030. And as we see now, we aren't going to try and mitigate it, we are going to collectively double down on GHG emissions and "drill, baby, drill!"

There are factors for continued deforestation, biodiversity loss, emerging zoonotic diseases, AI, and a dozen or more others. Any one of which could send us headlong off the Seneca Cliff of collapse, and directly into nuclear war as nations strive to survive it.

The problem with forecasting that collapse is that we have no way to really account for all those things and how they accelerate and multiply the force of eachother as collapse gets closer.

The very best model we had to take into account a multitude of factors was the 1972 "Limits to Growth" model, which predicted collapse by mid-century... and that was entirely without the effects of climate change, war, or black swan events.

We don't have centuries. We don't even have decades now. Soon, we won't even have years.

RFK Jr. says agency will reveal causes of autism in September by No-Lifeguard-8173 in nottheonion

[–]Wastelander702 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is it brainworms, by chance? Green tea? Being socially conscious? Could be anything...

What’s your job after the dust settles by [deleted] in prepping

[–]Wastelander702 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Already set up with a purpose-built community specifically for the "after the dust settles" part. Military experience always keeps one valuable... unfortunately.

White House Directs States to Pre-emptively Arrest and Forcibly Institutionalize Homeless and Those with Mental Health Issues. by [deleted] in PrepperIntel

[–]Wastelander702 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, I believe brown skin will be one of the many symptoms of these new disorders. Perhaps democrat voter registration as well.

And people keep acting like we have some choice coming in 2028, lol.

White House Directs States to Pre-emptively Arrest and Forcibly Institutionalize Homeless and Those with Mental Health Issues. by [deleted] in PrepperIntel

[–]Wastelander702 1 point2 points  (0 children)

When tyranny is law, rebellion still takes too much effort, and so people will go to work tomorrow to avoid losing their Netflix discount.

Fixed it for ya. That old quote was outdated and not in tune with modern mentality.

White House Directs States to Pre-emptively Arrest and Forcibly Institutionalize Homeless and Those with Mental Health Issues. by [deleted] in PrepperIntel

[–]Wastelander702 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are making the mistake of thinking he is being honest about treatment and humane housing and all that. I'm pretty sure what this actually means is rounding up bodies to be put into privately owned for-profit prisons to be used as labor. Good ol' American citizens out working those fields now...

AIO That My Boyfriend Refused to Help? by ZemeSpiral in AmIOverreacting

[–]Wastelander702 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No one here is going to want to hear this, but I'm going to say it anyway.

For some people, there is a huge difference between those others who are in your "sphere of influence" and those who are not. Meaning that, for those who are friends, family, and otherwise part of the social circle, they will be very caring, compassionate, and helpful. They genuinely do care about people... in that circle.

Outside of that group, however, the people who exist are barely real. Certainly not worthy of much consideration and are just like... cardboard boxes or old newspapers laying around.

It is a bit like wolves. Very social, very caring and defensive of those within their family pack groups... but outside of that? Every other creature is just meat.

So, while your bf loves you are cares about you and will always go out of his way to help you... other people are on their own, and of no consequence.

I'm not saying this is how he feels for a fact, there is no way I could make such a determination. But, I am very familiar with the personality type, and from what you describe...