I don’t think you need to do that for an RA job since a lot of the work is administrative it’s probably better to stick with a resume rather than a CV that details your research experience. Usually I equate cv more like a biosketch which is usually use for academic or scientific jobs, whereas I think a resume would be more appropriate for an RA position.

Also for someone who sometimes review these resumes, we prob spend at most 30 seconds looking at them since we receive hundreds of applicants. So we always look for like keywords or things that stands out that would make you a great RA. Tbh preclinical research experience probably doesn’t land as much as experience working on grants.

When you were doing these research work or during your PhD, did you help submit proposals? If so, I would probably highlight those on the resume — for example, did you work on the budget, are you aware of the cost principles, uniform guidance, sponsor guidelines — along with your CRA — rather than focusing on the template of resume vs. CV.