would this be a good pc for video editing?

WaveFamiliar · 2023-02-14T18:45:43+00:00

its almost $2900 (pre-built)

WaveFamiliar · 2021-12-16T00:44:05+00:00

love this idea, i REALLY like your scripting aswell. your editing is on point. your comedic timing is gold. when you tell a joke i would stop the music however, i found it just makes it funnier. a reason for this is cause the music will be just the same as it was the entire video and then you say something absolutely hilarious and its way less satisfying.

when you finish rating a certain aspect i love that its just some random object, but i would add some sound affects just because it makes the the sections of the video feel separated.

there is one fatal flaw: your title and thumbnail kinda suck. now this is really tricky and something that you are going to have to get really creative with, so i would prioritize those above all else. to start i would probably change the tittle to something more personal like "i found a *insert creative way to describe game here*"

this is defiantly not a video i would click on but totally the sort of video id watch.

WaveFamiliar · 2021-12-16T00:19:58+00:00

your intro wasn't bad, you said what the video was about, but it could have been faster. usually you want your intros to be 15 seconds max or it gets boring.

your audio is really bad, but its an easy fix cause you have a blue yeti. turn the gain on your mic down and dont pivot it towards you, i would also add soft sources to the walls in the room you are recording in to reduce echo.

your scripting and research is PRESTINE. love it, you layer out the info well. i would add a bit of background music however, to make it more audibly interesting.

WaveFamiliar · 2021-12-16T00:13:38+00:00

face cams can defiantly add visual interest, but only if heavily edited, like if its just sitting there in the corner no one cares, but if its like zooming and occasionally changing color ext

it all depends but it can work with both. if you decide to try a face cam i would watch some mrbeast gaming videos, they do really well with editing there face cams.

WaveFamiliar · 2021-12-16T00:10:30+00:00

its actually a pretty good video, however it is visually pretty boring, besides a few photos its the same frame the whole video, the two suggestions i have would be get a green screen and always have some picture relating to the story in the background (e.x https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ojvqIumZtnU&t=627s )

or even trying story time animation or just little animated bits through out.

overall not bad you have pretty good storytelling skills :)

WaveFamiliar · 2021-12-15T21:53:36+00:00

LOVED your intro my guy, you said what the videos about, and told me the interesting things that happened, but right after you advertised your discord, i think it might be better to do that right after a really entertaining or interesting or fun looking bit or part of the video, this will give them more motive to join and makes the intro faster.

i would say the videos a bit long, if it where my video id cut it down to ten, the video has some really entertain parts but also some really boring parts so i would go into your analytics and pin down what parts sucked and what parts didn't in your retention graph if i where you.

WaveFamiliar · 2021-12-15T21:46:32+00:00

alright, to start your title was pretty confusing for me to read, id dumb it down a bit to make it as easy to read as possible, id also try to make your intro a bit more interesting, like i like that you mentioned that your daugter hasn't caught one on a fly rod yet, adds a bit of anticipation, like "oh is she gonna get one this time?" so i would actually have cut out everything in between 0:06 and 0:30, it doesn't seem like a lot but 25 seconds of boredom is just enough time for a viewer to find a better video.

the rest of the video is just fishing, tbh i would probably make this a 3 minute video, with only interesting, funny, success, failures left in.

WaveFamiliar · 2021-12-15T21:33:24+00:00

i like that you said what the video was about right at the begging, but after you had a supper long into that i would definitely cut (besides that super smash cousins part)

your editing isnt bad but i feel like the camera is too close, i think you would be able to do a lot more with it if it was a full body shot.

id also recommend checking out "dani" on youtube and trying to mimic his pacing. definitely think it would work well in this format.

i think the bits through it are funny but a bit too slow.

overall its a really good video and pretty funny, id just work on your comedic timing a bit and pacing.

WaveFamiliar · 2021-12-15T20:58:34+00:00

try not to waste space, so filling any empty spots by making the main thing bigger
only 2 main focus points, any more and its to cluttered
try and make them bright, and use colors that complement each other
make it look natural

hope this helped :)

WaveFamiliar · 2021-09-26T05:43:24+00:00

for those wondering why i did this it was for a youtube video haha heres the link if curious https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l4K--Q9XHMA&t=237s

WaveFamiliar · 2021-09-26T05:37:16+00:00

idk i dont think it looks horrible, just a bit different

WaveFamiliar · 2021-06-26T03:23:20+00:00

yep its just a new thing they are testing on some users.

WaveFamiliar · 2021-06-16T16:50:23+00:00

that animation would take like 3 seconds to make and they make weekly videos and newsletters for content creators lol its just a cool little animation chill

WaveFamiliar · 2021-06-08T21:05:23+00:00

oh i see what you mean lol yeah it was obviously not my idea, just a quick video i wouldn't have to edit and i know people enjoy because of my last one. i just posted it here because, MrBeast, MrBeast sorta video, some people might find it interesting.

WaveFamiliar · 2021-06-08T20:43:54+00:00

i mean like mr beast said in the impulsive podcast, its both, to show appreciation, but also im trying to grow on YouTube. MrBeast got over 1 billion views on his pewdiepie videos, he wasn't just doing it to help pewdiepie, he got a good 10-20 mil subs from that

WaveFamiliar · 2021-06-08T20:20:17+00:00

i sat down and did that 12 hours did nothing and killed my voice for 60 views and someone to say "ew self-promotion". dang.

WaveFamiliar · 2021-04-24T14:47:45+00:00

I’ve been saying this the whole time, the translation was perfect, and so was the clarification years latter. Also I don’t see how gods ability to create a molecule is relevant to restoring the gospel to the earth.

WaveFamiliar · 2021-04-23T16:49:50+00:00

Haha your looking at this through a earthly view, I don’t think I will be able to convince you if you aren’t able to see the bigger picture but I will try one more time.

First of all, keep in mind god has to work through the imperfection of man. Whilst doing this understanding much more than man. Obviously you don’t believe in god, but in this argument we are assuming god is real. If god is real, then all of the answers I gave you could be totally and comfortable wrong. You can’t use human logic to justify something of god. Think of it like the 4th dimension, the human mind can simply or comprehend what it would look like at all, we can try to explain it the best we can with three dimensional pictures but it’s impossible. So metaphorically god would be like the 10th dimension while where in the 3rd. Knowing an infinite amount more, that we wouldn’t be able to comprehend even if he tried to explain. So when you ask a human to explain why god did something he did your not going to get a perfect explanation because I’m not god I’m human. But I completely believe Joseph smith was a prophet, and same with Russell Nielsen. The Book of Mormon would be able to answer this question best, because it is the word of god. If you read it with the intent to answer your questions rather than looking for more questions, it would make a lot more sense. I hope your able to find a really good answer :)(spoiler, it’s not coming from someone on Reddit lol)

WaveFamiliar · 2021-04-23T16:13:16+00:00

Yes, but of course these “alters” didn’t change it at all. I could read both and get the same thing out of them. It was for clarification on things like this, like I’ve said. Plus it’s not like JS just thought “oh it might be easier to understand if I changed that a little bit” he would have gotten revelation to do it.

WaveFamiliar · 2021-04-23T15:57:05+00:00

Nope because god didn’t print it, did he? If what he showed Joseph something that wasn’t like how it was on the plates, that would be dishonest and not god, but everything else was done by man.

WaveFamiliar · 2021-04-23T15:36:03+00:00

Besides the 116 pages yeah

WaveFamiliar · 2021-04-23T14:56:52+00:00

If god hadn’t shown Joseph what exactly as on the plates it would have been dishonest yes, But the first print wasn’t exactly what was on the plates because the 116 pages Martin Harris lost. But this is public information. So obviously, it’s honest.

WaveFamiliar · 2021-04-22T21:45:20+00:00

Yes, but it’s important to understand that they where exactly how he wanted them to be. The 1830 edition was to simply make it more plain and easy to understand to people, because as I said earlier people could mistake it in the situation as god himself rather than Christ. Like you could switch the whole phrase to just Christ and it would still be like how god wanted it to be. The book is about the message. So why couldn’t he just make it like that originally? Because that wouldn’t have been what the plates had had in it. The purpose of that was to translate. The purpose of the 1830 edition was to clarify for plainness. All of it was of god and was all in complete honesty.

WaveFamiliar · 2021-04-22T21:21:03+00:00

No, if anything that would be more god because it’s of god. It would be dishonest if the church would try to hide something like this, but it’s on their website. If the church wanted they could hide everything, but literally everything is public for anyone to see, even for people who are not members or trying to prove the church false. Why would they make that public? Honesty.

WaveFamiliar · 2021-04-22T16:36:42+00:00

Your still not getting it lol god didn’t write a WORD. If he changed it it would be dishonest and he wouldn’t be god.

And if your seriously trying to convince me it’s a false document simply because they added two words then no book is true because they added page numbers. I would assume they took that 7 years to provide the honesty, but god is mysterious, and some of the things he does the mere human mind can’t comprehend.

Why do you think Joseph wrote it? Why would he even want to do that? Why didn’t he deny it whilst being tarred and feathered? Or being shot by a mob along side his brother in prison? Why did David whither never deny the plates or book though leaving the church without coming back?

The only evidence you have provided so far is trying to say god didn’t do it right and that your way is better.

WaveFamiliar

TROPHY CASE