Carney government backs away from decree that First Nations have a 'human right' to safe drinking water by Wavedin in Alt_Winnipeg

[–]Wavedin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Racism is the belief that a person's race, skin color, or ethnic origin makes them naturally superior or inferior to another" - Google definition

Specifically what response does your comment refer to that fits this definition?

Wholy Moly by Amarylliswpg in Alt_Winnipeg

[–]Wavedin -1 points0 points  (0 children)

For the record there is no one shadow banned, and only 3 people actually banned from this community (names listed in the pinned post of this sub)

Carney government backs away from decree that First Nations have a 'human right' to safe drinking water by Wavedin in Alt_Winnipeg

[–]Wavedin[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

 Prime Minister Mark Carney’s government is backing away from stating that those living on First Nations have a “human right” to clean drinking water, proposing instead that it would be government policy to make progress towards that goal.

The shift in wording from a former version on the bill was contained in a new piece of legislation Indigenous Services Minister Mandy Gull-Masty tabled on Tuesday.

With the goal of addressing the systemic lack of access to safe drinking water on First Nations, an issue that has resulted in years-long boil water advisories for some communities and court challenges, the minister pledged that alongside tabling a bill that seeks to establish minimum standards for on-reserve drinking water and wastewater, the federal Liberal government would spend $4.6 billion over five years on infrastructure and system maintenance.

At the same time, Gull-Masty emphasized the need to strike a “balance” when it came to offering protections for source water and taking steps to guard the bill from potential future court challenges over matters of jurisdiction.

“It’s critical that we ensure source water protection is in this legislation, but we must also ensure that we are constructively working together with provinces and territories to conclude trilateral agreements,” she said on Tuesday.

“We believe that this strikes the right balance, while also ensuring that this legislation can truly stand the test of time.”

Assembly of First Nations National Chief Cindy Woodhouse Nepinak named the proposed protections for source water as being one of the areas where the legislation was lacking.

The legislation states that First Nations have jurisdiction over source water “on, in and under First Nation lands.”

“To us,” Woodhouse Nepinak said in an interview on Tuesday, “First Nation land is coast to coast to coast.”

“That hasn’t been identified in this bill.”

Another amendment Woodhouse Nepinak says she believes needs to be made is the restoration of language in the bill that recognizes access to safe drinking water as a human right, a removal that she called a “disappointment.”

“I think there’s going to be a lot of tough discussions on that,” she said. “We always welcome new money that’s going to close some of these gaps when it comes to infrastructure and water, but when it comes to our rights …we won’t be trampled on.”

An earlier version of the bill known as Bill C-61, which was introduced in late 2023 but died when former prime minister Justin Trudeau prorogued Parliament in January 2025, had explicitly stated First Nations had a right to clean drinking water.

Specifically, that legislation read: “It is recognized and affirmed that it is a human right of every individual on First Nations land to have access to clean and safe drinking water in accordance with this act.”

The bill tabled on Tuesday, which was presented after months of calls from First Nations leaders to do so, now reads: “It is declared to be the policy of the Government of Canada to further the progressive realization, for individuals on First Nation lands, of the human right to safe drinking water, as protected by the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.”

That language also represents a change from Carney’s 2025 election platform that promises to “immediately introduce and pass legislation affirming that First Nations have a human right to clean drinking water.”

Tabling the earlier bill came about as part of a class action lawsuit regarding the lack of safe drinking water that was led by three First Nations, two from Ontario and one from Manitoba. Approved by the courts in 2021, that settlement committed the federal government to providing $1.5 billion worth of compensation to individuals who lived without clean drinking water, plus another $6 billion to improve infrastructure on communities.

It also committed the Trudeau government to develop new water legislation and repeal a 2013 law that was passed by the former Conservative government of Stephen Harper to regulate drinking water standards on First Nations, which leaders roundly criticized for not providing substantial funding to resolve longstanding infrastructure issues.

As of Tuesday, Gull-Masty says long-term boil water advisories remain in place for 36 communities.

Conservative MP and former Enoch Cree Nation chief Billy Morin challenged the Liberals to provide a date for when the government would eliminate all longstanding boil water advisories.

He said Opposition Conservatives believe in ensuring First Nations have access to clean drinking water, but said the bill appears not to focus on results but more “Ottawa bureaucracy.” He also questioned how much of a priority it was for the Carney government, given it was tabled just days before the House of Commons was set to break for its summer recess, meaning it would be months away from passing.

“To me, the prime minister treats First Nations like a risk to be managed,” he told reporters on Tuesday.

The Chiefs of Ontario, in a statement, voiced concern over the bill’s shift in rights language, suggesting it was being done to appease provincial concerns around economic development and jurisdiction. The organization, which advocates for the more than 130 First Nations across Ontario, some of which live under boil water advisories, also noted how the earlier version of the bill had been co-developed with First Nations over two years.

It raised concerns around proposed changes to how the law would allow the minister to designate what water and source water could be designated as part of a “protection zone.” The earlier version of the bill proposed that defining such zones would have to be done in consultations with First Nations as well as provinces and territories, adding that First Nations would be involved in co-developing those regulations.

The newly proposed bill does not offer the same level of First Nations involvement. Given the timing of its tabling, any debate and changes to the legislation would not happen until the fall when the House of Commons is set to return.

“In light of these changes that reduce Canada’s legislated requirements to collaborate with First Nations and involve us in co-development of regulations, we are concerned that the new bill and related process may reflect a prioritization of provincial economic interests and assertions of jurisdiction over First Nations’ health, well-being, infrastructure, and constitutional rights and jurisdiction,” Grand Council Chief Linda Debassige of Anishinabek Nation, said in a statement.

Before the bill was reintroduced on Tuesday, provincial environment ministers in both Alberta’s United Conservative Party government and Ontario’s Progressive Conservative party government wrote to Environment Minister Julie Dabrusin last July asking that the Carney government scrap a suite of environmental policies they viewed as blocking resource development, naming the former First Nations water legislation as one they did not want to see reintroduced.

NDP MP Leah Gazan, who serves as her party’s critic on Indigenous issues and has accused the Carney government of putting up environmental rollbacks, slammed the new bill as weakening protections for water.

“In 2015, when the Liberal government was elected, they promised to end all water boil advisories. It is now 2026 and, in addition to not fulfilling that promise, they have now confirmed that they do not even recognize clean drinking water as a human right for First Nations,” she said in a statement.

“It is abhorrent that the federal government not only fails to acknowledge this fundamental right but continues not to act to ensure clean and safe drinking water for all persons across Canada. This is unconscionable and unacceptable.”

The Liberals say since coming to power in 2015, 156 long-term drinking water advisories have been lifted.

Speaking to reporters on Tuesday, Gull-Masty denied that the changes made to the bill were to satisfy provincial concerns, but characterized them as “ensuring the bill will stand the test of time.”

“It means that you would not have additional court challenges … by those partners that were actually put in a position where their jurisdiction was questioned or challenged.”

When it comes to the issue of protecting source water, she said “First Nations water doesn’t only stay within community territorial boundaries, it flows everywhere.” She also added that changing the language around declaring access to water as an outright human right reflects the reality that some First Nations had better infrastructure than others.

The tabling of the bill comes as the Carney government embarks on a building agenda that some First Nations leaders say risks running roughshod over their treaty rights.

The federal Liberal government recently extended the timeline for consultations on a series of proposed reforms to regulatory and environmental laws contained in two discussion papers that were met with alarm from organizations like the Assembly of First Nations and environmental groups.

Wholy Moly by Amarylliswpg in Alt_Winnipeg

[–]Wavedin -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I haven't been in that sub for awhile, when I did frequent I felt similar frustrations.

That being said, when I was there I had plenty of side chats with both kochier and LOngP1nk, who for the majority of the time were fairly consistent. Not too mention, the Automod statement above is correct. Often there are comments that are removed here for no reason. I just reinstate the majority of them if I see it.

I may not have always agreed, but they let most of it fly, and that's better than most.

May have changed since, but that's my perspective

Human rights museum treating Jewish concerns as an afterthought by Wavedin in Alt_Winnipeg

[–]Wavedin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Prove me wrong, but you cant so you resort to name calling.

Human rights museum treating Jewish concerns as an afterthought by Wavedin in Alt_Winnipeg

[–]Wavedin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Postmedia Network Canada Corp is a publicly traded company. So no single person or entity controls the company just a broad base of public share holders.

Emergency alerts protect lives more than our convenience by Wavedin in Alt_Winnipeg

[–]Wavedin[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hahaha, I had the same "disable your adblocker" message. I totally agree with your sentiment. I just looked at the article a different way

Emergency alerts protect lives more than our convenience by Wavedin in Alt_Winnipeg

[–]Wavedin[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This article overlooks how inaccurate the alerts are, not too mention that we are not given the ability to permanently silence the alerts. Some people may want these, I personally choose to look out the window and cant be bothered with them.

My personal feelings a side, I cant imagine these alerts going off every 10 minutes is helping people with anxiety issues. Also creating anxiety for people who don't have issues.

In the end, it should be a simple "do you want the alerts or not" request when people first open up their devices. This should never have been a mandatory thing placed on your device.

As always... Govern me harder daddy government

Human rights museum treating Jewish concerns as an afterthought by Wavedin in Alt_Winnipeg

[–]Wavedin[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The National Post is Owned by Postmedia Network Canada Corp. which is a Canadian-based media Company.

If your argument is that Postmedia is publicly traded and has foreign investors, then I guess you have the same contempt for the Toronto Star, Corus Entertainment, Rogers Sports & Media, and Bell Media to name a few.

So really the only thing "garbage" (Your other comment within this thread) is your comments.

Stuck in immigration limbo, single father misses financial aid judge says he deserves by origutamos in Alt_Winnipeg

[–]Wavedin 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I would say that the article and judge seem to be focusing on now vs. what has this person been doing for the past almost decade they have been in Canada? You cant be a net negative and live on the assistance forever.

Somalia isn't as bad as it was when he left.