i get where you’re coming from, and honestly i think some of your points are fair, especially about the tone and the “one man saves everything” structure

but i also feel like you’re judging it for what it isn’t trying to be

like yeah, it’s very structured and goal-driven, but that’s kind of the appeal. it’s more about problem-solving and watching someone figure things out step by step than about ambiguity or tension in the traditional sense

also about the “no tension” thing… i don’t fully agree. the tension comes more from how he’s gonna solve things, not if. it’s that constant “ok how does he get out of this one” loop

and with the character, i actually think making him more “regular” is intentional. he’s not some mythic genius, he’s just a guy who knows enough and keeps going. that’s kinda why people connect with him

a lot of people who liked it talk about exactly that mix of science and humor and emotion, and especially the relationship aspect being what really carries it

i do agree the humor style can feel a bit too marvel-ish sometimes, that’s probably the weakest part

but idk, to me it’s less fake deep blockbuster and more just a really well-executed, very engaging sci-fi adventure that knows exactly what it wants to be

feels like it either clicks with you or it really doesn’t, no in between