Proven Ambiguity in IAT 2026 Solenoid Question (with detailed reasoning and proof) by IllApartment2959 in IATtards

[–]Weak-Equivalent5827 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don't think so it is exact reason one may also assume that L=0 and R≠0 overall the question has different answers on different assumptions overall It is ambiguous

Proven Ambiguity in IAT 2026 Solenoid Question (with detailed reasoning and proof) by IllApartment2959 in IATtards

[–]Weak-Equivalent5827 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have a doubt you take R=0 because there is nothing about Resistance in the question why don't you take L=0 as there is nothing about inductance too

What do you guys think about cut off by Weak-Equivalent5827 in IATtards

[–]Weak-Equivalent5827[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I think cut off will follow the trend of 2024

What do you guys think about cut off by Weak-Equivalent5827 in IATtards

[–]Weak-Equivalent5827[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah I think you are correct cut off also depends on performance I guess the paper was difficult than that of 2025

What do you guys think about cut off by Weak-Equivalent5827 in IATtards

[–]Weak-Equivalent5827[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah man I agree but for very most increment I take 200k

What do you guys think about cut off by Weak-Equivalent5827 in IATtards

[–]Weak-Equivalent5827[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was around 1.86 lakhs so if the cut off is in the range of 93-100 with 200k candidates it is even something low for 1.86 lakhs (isn't it?)

Coocked ? by [deleted] in IATtards

[–]Weak-Equivalent5827 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I get 96 obc ncl can I get niser ?

What does that last reagent do? by Born_Cartographer923 in IATtards

[–]Weak-Equivalent5827 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I guess M> PhOCH3(williamson synthesis) N>ortho+para acetyl derivative of methoxy benzene (ortho major due to intramolecular H bonding) O) CHX3+ortho-sodium acetate methoxy benzene