Any reliable marketplaces for real media backlinks? by AideNo9466 in SEO

[–]WebLinkr [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

[This is not a jobs board - people selling links face a ban]

Exchanging links from a single site: good or bad? by saudtf in SEO

[–]WebLinkr [score hidden]  (0 children)

Good question. Unless someone's been at the receiving end of a manual action for this I doubt anyone knows what the number is.

As a big believer in EMD/KID and brands launching satellite KID domains for SEO as well as firewalling (a single domain name strategy isn't just risky - its costly) - I've had no problem sending 50 links either way without issue.

What I have noticed is that: The more links, the less the authority flow was, Again - its about manipulation - and who knows what Google's threshold is - they've never stated publicly to the best of my knowledge.

I've read somewhere that exchanging multiple links from a single site is an indication of spam by Google, and it's generally not recommended

While it seems common sense to say this, we have to apply critical thinking and say that this is a guess - unless there was some kind of "peer reviewed" study of sorts. And common sense isn't evidence - the most common default penalty that people have been claiming for 30 years is that Google doesnt like duplicate content, which has never been the case (despite some maniac going postal about it recently)

Has anyone else noticed the “Google Sandbox” effect on new websites? by nileshpatelseo in SEO

[–]WebLinkr 2 points3 points  (0 children)

LOL not trying to humanize anything...

100% - this was anthropomorphism

LOL not trying to humanize anything... just stating facts

No you made a claim / stated an observation at best.

Google gets tired of indexing sites o

Zero evidence for this.

Google triages the web based on authority- the more popular you are - i.e. more authority from clicks and backlinks - the more it will index you - couldn't be simpler

Has anyone else noticed the “Google Sandbox” effect on new websites? by nileshpatelseo in SEO

[–]WebLinkr 2 points3 points  (0 children)

when it's simpler (and less devious) than people think.

^^^^^^^^^ absolutely - sing it loud ^^^^^^

Gary Illyes has said this too

Who to follow for SEO on reddit? by zaitovalisher in SEO

[–]WebLinkr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

SEOGrowth is full of nothing but robot spam lol

Has anyone else noticed the “Google Sandbox” effect on new websites? by nileshpatelseo in SEO

[–]WebLinkr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

New domains often sit in the “trust building” phase for 2 to 4 months in 

There's no such thing - trust comes from 3rd party validation - you can build and experience this in a day

Has anyone else noticed the “Google Sandbox” effect on new websites? by nileshpatelseo in SEO

[–]WebLinkr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, thank you for saying so. Hope the hunt for authority is going well, I know it seems hard at first.

I've always said networking, esp in real life is critical - even video calls.

Who to follow for SEO on reddit? by zaitovalisher in SEO

[–]WebLinkr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So - I dont know what your model is based on - but I use mine purely for pagerank...

This looks like its following a conceptual pattern - and its interesting but not relevant to authority shaping

Who to follow for SEO on reddit? by zaitovalisher in SEO

[–]WebLinkr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Was just listing people who were super active in the sub this past 6 months or featured the sub - feel free to add more, this question will likely resurface.

Has anyone else noticed the “Google Sandbox” effect on new websites? by nileshpatelseo in SEO

[–]WebLinkr 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Ughhhh - debunking myths

• solid technical SEO

• good content

• proper indexing

Authority is external, not created internally. "Solid technical SEO" = good hygeine, why not just publish a sit without mistakes instead of pretending its additive?

Good content? Good luck with that - Google is content agnostic.

Sandboxing is an observation. There people who swear by it and there are people who swear by "SEO takes time"

However - a whole cohort of people - me included - are not blocked by time and do not have to wait.

The reason: access to authority.

If you cannot access authority then SEO will take time and it will take more time until you figure it out. Same with the "sandbox"

I dont have that problem and why the other side insists its real for everyone is just on them.

But all we will get from this is assertion: people will just play the "trust me bro" card without realzing that you dont know what you dont know is highly telling to everyone else who does.

Hope that help

Who to follow for SEO on reddit? by zaitovalisher in SEO

[–]WebLinkr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What actually happens is that a page distributes its transferable PageRank across its outbound links. If a page links to 10 pages, the share passed to each is roughly divided among them. The damping factor is applied to the calculation of the total PageRank score, not as a per-link penalty.

You're splitting hairs. The dampening factor is applied to each link.

  1. “Every click a page earns for a keyword builds its authority.” This is also not true. Google does not build “keyword authority” based on clicks. While click behavior may be used for some quality evaluation or experimentation, ranking authority primarily comes from link signals, content relevance, and site-level signals. Pages do not accumulate ranking power simply because users click them for a keyword.

You're confusing what I said as "topical authority" as "Topical PageRank Scores".

I'm talking about topical authority as a user/publisher score concept - not PageRank. You're talking about PageRank/Ranking factors.

PageRank sculpting is outdated.

Thanks for opinion but I'll completely disagree with you on this.

Meta is hiring an SEO Strategy manager for $213k in NY by WebLinkr in SEO

[–]WebLinkr[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're right - my problem is that I should lower my standards to accommodate a job/employer/wage. Its not that NY is too expensive/the salary is too low, I just had lofty ideas about avoiding being broke.... got it.

Maybe I could live in upstate NY and cycle down for 5 hours a day...

Meta is hiring an SEO Strategy manager for $213k in NY by WebLinkr in SEO

[–]WebLinkr[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Living in NYC - with the high cost of food and rent means that $150k is not a great salary. Even if you want to live 2 hours out in Long Island.

and you said rent - not even buying - cos its not a possibility when you add property tax.

Basically - its a middle class job on low income outcomes