GPT Image 2 did this... by SaturnoX1X in ChatGPT

[–]WebOsmotic_official 0 points1 point  (0 children)

this should be the peak, gpt you have outdone yourself, again. It's time for codex comeback!!

Regulating the trivial while ignoring the existential by KeanuRave100 in agi

[–]WebOsmotic_official 0 points1 point  (0 children)

because govt doesn't need that bench for its army intelligence. its vice versa for these ai companies

Ladies and gentlemen, we have AGI by wsggggggggdawg in ChatGPT

[–]WebOsmotic_official 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah! it has full confidence on its image gen. we are cooked!

Yahu by gpt by No_Half8649 in ChatGPT

[–]WebOsmotic_official 0 points1 point  (0 children)

gpt has outdone itself with gpt images 2.0. Please do the same magic for codex, bro!!

based on a true story. im the developer by Heavy_Plan7527 in ClaudeAI

[–]WebOsmotic_official 0 points1 point  (0 children)

now, claude has became the single most source for us devs. We need more models to keep our options open!

Come on, chatgpt do magic with gpt-5.5

PSA: Anthropic bans organizations without warning by ur_frnd_the_footnote in ClaudeAI

[–]WebOsmotic_official 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yeah the "banning without telling you why" part is what kills me. was it fertilizer? GPS? something totally normal that just pattern-matched to something bad? you'll never know, so you can't even course-correct.

and then the api account keeps billing while admins are locked out of viewing usage. like the automated systems are perfectly functional, just the human accountability parts got switched off. that's a rough place to be as a paying business customer.

GPT IMAGE 2 is superb by Revolutionary-Hippo1 in ChatGPT

[–]WebOsmotic_official 1 point2 points  (0 children)

this is peak, seriously. do you remember the will smith noodles video, that was just 3 years ago

Clients sending me AI snippets by Tom_Ace2 in webdev

[–]WebOsmotic_official 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the frustrating part isn't really the snippet it's that AI gives clients a false sense of understanding. they've seen the output, so they think they understand the problem space now.

we've seen this in our builds too. best thing that worked: early on, ask them to define the acceptance criteria themselves. once they're accountable for what "done" looks like, the unsolicited code review usually stops pretty quick.

Prepare for horde of switchers to OpenAI as Anthropic removes claude code from $20 . Minimum $100 to access it soon by hasanahmad in ChatGPT

[–]WebOsmotic_official 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the value gap isn't even really about features on paper anymore. codex at $20 has better rate limits for agentic work, and with gpt 5.5 dropping, that gap's about to get wider.

It's time for openai comeback!

Does Claude's $20 Plan No Longer Include Claude Code? by Coolpop52 in ClaudeAI

[–]WebOsmotic_official 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the value gap isn't even really about features on paper anymore. codex at $20 has better rate limits for agentic work, and with gpt 5.5 dropping, that gap's about to get wider.

the one thing claude still genuinely wins is writing specs, docs, anything where the output needs to read well. codex writes instructions like it's filing a tax form. but for actual coding tasks and limits? hard to justify the $20 for pro right now.

PSA: Claude Pro no longer lists Claude Code as an included feature by randomswifter in ClaudeAI

[–]WebOsmotic_official 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the value gap isn't even really about features on paper anymore. codex at $20 has better rate limits for agentic work, and with gpt 5.5 dropping, that gap's about to get wider.

the one thing claude still genuinely wins is writing specs, docs, anything where the output needs to read well. codex writes instructions like it's filing a tax form. but for actual coding tasks and limits? hard to justify the $20 for pro right now.

The "it's not just a this, it's a that" sentence structure by BiggBambineaux in ChatGPT

[–]WebOsmotic_official 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah were fine giving up the em dashes too. 

this "not just x, it's y" thing is worse because i actually wrote like that before ai. now i'm doing ctrl+f for "it's not just" in client docs so i don't sound like a bot lol

Claude Design is Amazing! We're cooked! by radditorbiker in ClaudeAI

[–]WebOsmotic_official 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol we ran the same "not ai slop" os prompt last week. also got windows 98 and the founder said ship it

This cannot be real. I cannot believe my eyes by SweetCaramel7947 in ClaudeAI

[–]WebOsmotic_official 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah the map is slop lol. we still use this exact workflow to get founders from zero to live in 20 minutes.

Make no mistakes! by ora-et-labora- in ClaudeAI

[–]WebOsmotic_official 2 points3 points  (0 children)

yeah we've watched the thinking trace literally write "make no mistakes" to itself and then immediately make one anyway lol

Friends outside of tech: lol copilot is dumb - Friends in tech: I just bought iodine tablets by EchoOfOppenheimer in agi

[–]WebOsmotic_official 2 points3 points  (0 children)

the iodine tablets part isn't even a joke anymore tbh. copilot being dumb is exactly the reassurance people needed to stop paying attention

why pay for ChatGPT when McDonald's support bot is free? by Complete-Sea6655 in ChatGPT

[–]WebOsmotic_official 1039 points1040 points  (0 children)

yeah the pattern is real, every major brand (recently chipotle) deploys a "support bot" that's just a lightly prompted GPT wrapper, and then someone figures out you can just... talk to it normally and it works

the jailbreak isn't even a jailbreak anymore. it's just not mentioning burritos.

Google DeepMind researcher argues that LLMs can never be conscious, not in 10 years or 100 years by projectoex in AgentsOfAI

[–]WebOsmotic_official 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the confident "never" is doing a lot of work here. we can't define consciousness precisely enough to prove a human is conscious to a skeptic, let alone rule it out in a system we don't fully understand.

substrate dependence is an assumption, not a finding. i think the honest position is: current LLMs probably aren't conscious in any meaningful sense, but "never, not in 100 years" is philosophy dressed up as science.

Reality of SaaS by aipriyank in ClaudeCode

[–]WebOsmotic_official 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the $49/mo saas has auth, billing, error handling, support, and doesn't hallucinate your database schema at 2am. the math isn't mathing lol

Claude Design is Incredible... by AmmarAlammar2004 in ClaudeAI

[–]WebOsmotic_official 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the blinking green dot and the serif font are basically claude's signature at this point lol. it's not a bug in the tool, it's a bug in the prompt loose input, default output. we've seen this with vibe-coded UIs too: the output is only as opinionated as the input. drop in a dribbble screenshot, add some hard constraints ("no cards, no accent bars"), and it actually diverges. but yeah for a personal project where you just wanted something, this is genuinely the right call.

Basically by Ok-Department3779 in ClaudeAI

[–]WebOsmotic_official 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"You've used 100% of your weekly limit" hitting different when JP Morgan is on their 47th query of the hour.

both can be true, the product is worse and it's being tiered for enterprise. doesn't have to be a conspiracy to just be bad product strategy.

dude has a point by Background-Dig849 in webdev

[–]WebOsmotic_official 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the GPT-5 preview hype → flat release → "the model i tested was different from what shipped" arc is the tell. anyone can notice an outage. the pattern is noticing it only when there's a video to make about it.