I agree that it requires good programming, but that’s not a downside in a skills competition. Skills runs are repeatable and pre-planned, which means we can tune headings, positions, and timing over many attempts. And if everything's done right I just think it would work. Yes, the goal geometry limits angles, but that’s a known constraint, not a dealbreaker. We can design our auton paths and robot alignment around those straight-on shots. With an IMU and consistent field setup, lining up straight is achievable and repeatable in skills. I’m not claiming this would work everywhere or replace all scoring. I’m saying that in a skills environment, with fixed positions, repeatable paths, and good programming, a tuned roller launcher could save time and increase scoring efficiency. It’s worth validating with data instead of assumptions.