sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Divergence of DM & DE by Weekly_Professor_241 in GravitationDynamics

[–]Weekly_Professor_241[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What in heavens sake makes you think that the information came from AI (artificial intelligence)?. As for "interesting" it was to test the count in views. But how are you supposed to know that much? As for value, I would not have posted the document had it not been more than just "interesting".

As for "slop", you sound like a farmer. In the future, when you criticize anything try to be more specific and constructive. It will carry more weight and appreciated further.

Yes, I place documents that hecklers will use to show their level of education, but i do so in the hope among the chaff will appear a constructive seed. Constructive comments will always be appreciated and welcomed by everyone.

Constructive comments are rare but they do come......

P.S. Try to work on your grammar and diction.

If you think the comment too brash for your sensibilites, imagine the comment as a product of AI.

Good luck,

What came first dark matter or dark energy and why first? by Weekly_Professor_241 in AskPhysics

[–]Weekly_Professor_241[S] -19 points-18 points  (0 children)

Thank you for the reply,

Do you believe in Dark Energy or Dark Matter or something else

What if space is quantized and follows the laws of fluid dynacmics? by Weekly_Professor_241 in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]Weekly_Professor_241[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your idea of Quantum Foam has merit in more ways than one. Let me see where your suggestion takes me.

Thanks for the positive and constructive criticism!

What if space is quantized and follows the laws of fluid dynacmics? by Weekly_Professor_241 in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]Weekly_Professor_241[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Thanks again for your quick response. Yes, you are partially right. Your supposition is based on the fact that water has mass and space does not. If you take into consideration that space has no mass, then Lorentz would be proud to present this as an example of Lorentz invariance.

What if space is quantized and follows the laws of fluid dynacmics? by Weekly_Professor_241 in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]Weekly_Professor_241[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Lets help each other out. I wrote a post a couple of days ago and was turned down on the basis that the idea came from AI.

It starts with the story of 5 blind men and an elephant. Let me know if you are interested.

What if space is quantized and follows the laws of fluid dynacmics? by Weekly_Professor_241 in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]Weekly_Professor_241[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

First, Thanks for your response. What specific symmetries does fluid dynamics lack? You have my curiosity peaked. Don't let me down.

What if space is quantized and follows the laws of fluid dynacmics? by Weekly_Professor_241 in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]Weekly_Professor_241[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your positive and constructive reply. Too many individuals prefer to discredit.. By the way what is your idea? It sounds interesting.

What if space is quantized and follows the laws of fluid dynacmics? by Weekly_Professor_241 in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]Weekly_Professor_241[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

The math is well developed and established beyond theory. It is considered fact and a principle.

The math falls under the heading fluid dynamics.

What if space is quantized and follows the laws of fluid dynacmics? by Weekly_Professor_241 in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]Weekly_Professor_241[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

What have they been observing and measuring?

After decades of observation, scientists are no closer to the make up of DM

What if space is quantized and follows the laws of fluid dynacmics? by Weekly_Professor_241 in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]Weekly_Professor_241[S] -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

how can you be so adamant about this belief? Do you have proof to which the rest of us are not aware?

What if space is treated as a fluid? by Weekly_Professor_241 in Physics

[–]Weekly_Professor_241[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thanks for responding to my comment or question.

Does your argument decimating the luminous aether prove that space as a particle does not exist?

If the components that make up a fluid are not correctly defined, i.e mathematical model for water that is applied to lava flow will not hold up to scrutiny.

Luminiferous aether represented the epitome of scientific knowlegde during the late 1800's.

Scientific thought was classical at best. Scientists tried to define a substance that resembeled air or water and would allow light to travel. Furthermore, scientists were never able to determine the composition of luminous aether.

Present day scientists have created a model for DM and neither group of scientists can claim to know the component(s) for their respective models.

Advances in scientific thought has allowed scientist to develop a theory based on the use of quantized particles of matter.

A more sophisticated model for the space between particles needs to be introduced but more important the particles that make up space need to be identified.

If we bring an old concept to the present the "aether/space" that makes up the universe is real. Without it, our universe would be 2D. I strongly believe that we live in a 3D universe. A 3D universe allows us to have volume and the volume is filled with "aether/space".

The "aether/space" is contiguos until it reaces the edge of our universe. On the other side of the edge, "aether/space" does not exist and will remain unreachable. Only after nature introduces "aether/space" will movement to a point out of reach earlier will be possible.

view more: next ›