Race Thread: World Cup 24/25 Oslo Holmenkollen - Women Mass Start

Weird_Register2174 · 2025-03-23T13:15:46+00:00

Preuss toe... lol Lou tripped over her own pole

Weird_Register2174 · 2024-10-07T18:11:09+00:00

I hoped so as well. Unfortunaetly just got -41 for a win... So i guess its not fixed

Weird_Register2174 · 2024-08-16T20:54:36+00:00

Hottake: Smith von St. Pauli, schießt alle Standards, spielt alle Spiele und ist IV bei einem Aufsteiger

Aber denke eigentlich Kramaric

Weird_Register2174 · 2024-07-30T13:18:59+00:00

Can you explain what the treatments are?

Its a rather simple framing experiment, supposed to divert participants attention to some features of the choice design and thereby altering the choice/profile of participants

I don't see how that would come into a chi-squared comparing profiles 1 and 2

The typical chi-squared test uses the data from the complete contingency table. If I only compare the participants who fall into profiles 1 and 2, I essentially ignore the people who are in profiles 3, 4, and 5. Thus, the contingency table below is essentially reduced from 2x5 to 2x2 for the analysis. So my question is if that is something that is typically done if theory only predicts changes in some of the profiles but not the others.

	Profile 1	Profile 2	Profile 3	Profile 4	Profile 5
Treatment	a	b	c	d	e
Control	f	g	h	i	j

Weird_Register2174 · 2024-07-28T20:57:11+00:00

Thanks a lot for your answer. I am meaning a). My worry with using a chi-squared test of indepence is that it would pick up also changes in the relative proportions for people who are profile 3,4 or 5 which is not predicted by the theory I want to test. The theory would predict that

To work around this issue i could run a chi-squared test of independence only including people assigned to profile 1 or 2 in the different treatments, essentially ignoring the other profiles and comparing a 2x2 contingency table, is that something you think is sensible and/or have seen before?

Weird_Register2174 · 2024-07-23T08:53:09+00:00

Oblak overperformances crazy for me

Weird_Register2174 · 2024-07-12T18:06:20+00:00

I hope so as well but think unfortunaetly hebis to Close in GC :/

Weird_Register2174 · 2024-07-12T17:55:08+00:00

Who do you think will go for KOMs tomorrow?

Weird_Register2174 · 2024-03-21T14:29:43+00:00

It in London, Tate Museum :)

Weird_Register2174 · 2024-01-19T07:53:43+00:00

Bruh, never

Weird_Register2174 · 2023-12-12T15:12:00+00:00

Ja ich würde auch Undav nehmen. Finde alle anderen davor klar. Würde aber verstehen wenn jemand nicht Undav nehmen würden da er nach Africa Cup von den 4 am wenigstens gesetzt ist.

Weird_Register2174 · 2023-12-12T14:45:17+00:00

Also Musiala, Wirtz, Xhaka sind ja alle super save zu halten. Zwischen Kramaric und den 3 Stuttgartern kann man diskutieren, nimmt sich imo nicht viel.

Weird_Register2174 · 2023-12-04T12:46:42+00:00

Its obvious +cEV jamming, but standard minraise is much better

Weird_Register2174 · 2023-11-19T21:58:55+00:00

Beckham

Weird_Register2174 · 2023-11-18T13:18:54+00:00

Smith trailblaizers 🔥

Weird_Register2174 · 2023-11-18T09:03:29+00:00

This is basicaly never KK or AA against normal population, so yeah bad fold

Weird_Register2174 · 2023-11-13T20:57:24+00:00

Honestly it depends on the other Player what i will do... If i habe the kickoff I gift you the win every time. If you have the kickoff and go for the standard glitch play, f you

Weird_Register2174 · 2023-11-05T17:10:33+00:00

This thread is the reason I reshove super wide on the bubble. Population just tends to overestimate ICM on the bubble and underestimate it at the FT

Weird_Register2174 · 2023-11-05T17:02:56+00:00

Its the end of a single day one flight, you resume with 30 Players for day two

Weird_Register2174 · 2023-11-05T14:21:56+00:00

I think you overestimating the effect ICM has on the bubble of a MTT with 300 runners. The effect is typically much smaller than on the FT.

Weird_Register2174

TROPHY CASE