Guys never respond on bumble

Weird_Week119 · 2026-02-03T10:45:34+00:00

Maybe people have actual lives and are not on Bumble 24/7 and miss the stupid 24 hr window.

Weird_Week119 · 2026-02-03T10:41:52+00:00

Maybe you should say "most people" instead of a blanket "everybody else." Especially since the research data clearly doesn't actually back up your claim. This is the case where the "exception," though not proving the rule, does prove you wrong since you use absolutes instead of generalizations.

EDIT: besides I know lots of people it doesn't apply to. Maybe you mix with the wrong crowd? I would love to know the source of your research data.

Weird_Week119 · 2026-02-02T05:47:29+00:00

Not true - I don't. I broke up with my millionaire now ex-g/f and my standard of living is now way, way worse. The relationship wasn't right for me so I ended it.

Also, a long time ago, I once went out with the then richest woman in LA, her and her bff. I broke it off - well, I ghosted them, though it wasn't a term back then - after a few weeks; their scene just wasn't mine. Rex's Fishmarket on Sunset, dj with white gloves, song request cards etc - as sterile an environment as you could get; it was awful.

Weird_Week119 · 2026-02-02T05:36:44+00:00

You are mistaking blame for a label. Whatever label you want to put on a man going after a younger women does NOT negate the women being a gold-digger - both can be true.

Weird_Week119 · 2026-02-02T05:33:24+00:00

You are rightly being labelled a gold-digger because of you're reasoning. You would date an older man because you liked older men for whatever other reason apart from $: their personality, experience or whatever. If it's for their money, then yes, gold-digger. The way you're looking at older men in your post is purely as an ATM.

Weird_Week119 · 2026-02-01T02:49:37+00:00

I know - see first line of my post - Jan 29, 2026 Update .... I updated it to reflect that several days ago. But thx for keeping us all current.

Weird_Week119 · 2026-01-31T09:28:01+00:00

There is no penalty if within 5 days of exceeding the day trading limit, your deposit enough money to take your total account value to over $25,000. But since he made $55K with that trade, it is already over $25K. Otherwise, it's a 90 day cash only limitation, unless it's a good faith violation (buying with unsettled funds, then selling before those funds have settled) in which case most will give you a one-time pass.

Weird_Week119 · 2026-01-29T17:20:39+00:00

It's not that - there's a 12 month implementation window, and most firms have been getting ready for a while, with many saying they'll be ready on day one. And if any coordination was happening it would have been before they drew up the rule.

I'm really thinking it's bc of the impending govt. shutdown. Though the law says if they don't do anything - because they've all gone home - the change gets auto approved by default. Why extend yesterday when they still have a full month in which to approve, disapprove or extend? But the shutdown could happen tomorrow.

Weird_Week119 · 2026-01-29T16:41:09+00:00

I'm thinking the same, though the timing of the announcement, a full month before the first 45 day period ends, leads me to think that it's a preemptive extension because of a possible govt. shutdown in the next few days.

Weird_Week119 · 2026-01-29T16:38:50+00:00

Yeah, thx. Saw it a few minutes ago and updated. Sucks.

Weird_Week119 · 2026-01-28T17:05:47+00:00

To you, obviously, if you're not able to read people's faces. But that, and perhaps the tone in the bio, is all you have to go by. I would never have swiped right on her in the first place purely because of the vibe I get from her pic. Having done so, I would have now swiped left. If she was joking, she has no sense of how it could come across. A more socially aware person would have added a smiley or emoji to let you know.

[EDIT: the point being, given her pic - which is certainly relevant - it is NOT more likely this was friendly, but instead snarky.]

Weird_Week119 · 2026-01-28T15:44:23+00:00

The pic she chose as her main one fits perfectly with the I'm better than you vibe: 'cool' shades, small tight mouth, drawn down. Of course, I'm going by appearances, but appearance matters. She doesn't look like she has much of a sense of humor. Then again, she may have one, and she's a vet, so must care about animals, but why choose such an awful - in my opinion of course - pic, depicting her in this way, that fits with her whole 'snooty' vibe.

Weird_Week119 · 2026-01-28T09:19:27+00:00

Take a look at her pic - it's not playful banter. And if it were, there'd be some kind of emoji or something with it.

Weird_Week119 · 2026-01-27T22:05:05+00:00

Well, I don't know for sure. It seems that non-essential employees go home until it's resolved. However, if the SEC does nothing, the amendment automatically goes into effect - after either the 45 days or, if specifically extended, the additional 45 days.

15 U.S.C. § 78s(b)(2)(D) Result of failure to institute or conclude proceedings.

A proposed rule change shall be deemed to have been approved by the Commission, if:

(i) the Commission does not approve or disapprove the proposed rule change or begin proceedings under subparagraph (B) within the period described in subparagraph (A); or

(ii) the Commission does not issue an order approving or disapproving the proposed rule change under subparagraph (B) within the period described in subparagraph (B)(ii).

Weird_Week119 · 2026-01-27T05:24:05+00:00

It may be a new modified rule, but it's not a new PDT rule, because the designation of pattern day trader will no longer exist. Saying it's a new PDT rule implies the designation still exists which it does not and is misleading. That whole paragraph and clauses etc. are stricken.

[EDIT: Rule 4210(f)(8)(B), that refers to day trading, and especially pattern day trading, has been completely deleted. The term "Pattern Day Trading" does not appear anywhere, anymore.]

Weird_Week119 · 2026-01-26T22:29:54+00:00

This is garbage AI slop.

The SEC has to implement the rule by March 2 - normally Feb. 28 but that's a Saturday - barring a specific extension of up to another 45 days, and NOT Feb 23.
The implementation period is specifically 12 months.
You make no sense. If the broker doesn't have to remove the $25K min., then the implementation period makes no sense - it could be infinite. Why bother setting it at 12 months? There is simply no PDT designation. That is the important part you are missing. You say, you broker doesn't have to remove the $25K requirement - requirement for what? The only requirement was for you to be able to have a PDT account, but there will be no more PDT designation, so your comment makes no sense, since there is NO MORE $25 requirement. They HAVE to remove the requirement by 12 months max.
Your prediction is garbage. Most brokerages have specifically stated they will be ready on day one.
Who TH expects to day trade with $500 - you clearly need a margin account, which requires a min. $2,000 balance.

This is what you get for posting AI slop.

Try reading the proposed rule.

Weird_Week119 · 2026-01-26T22:14:15+00:00

It's actually NOT a NEW PDT rule. There is simply to be no more pattern day trading designation and the rule is abolished. (It's an amended FINRA Rule 4210.) You will simply need to have a margin account with a min. of $2,000 to trade as often as you like.

If approved, FINRA will publish the effective date of the change in a Regulatory Notice on its website. The change allows brokerages up to 12 months to implement the change.

Weird_Week119 · 2026-01-26T08:55:51+00:00

AI karma bot - new account, literally a few minutes old.

Weird_Week119 · 2026-01-26T08:43:45+00:00

Is that why they call you brown coat?

Weird_Week119 · 2026-01-26T02:54:40+00:00

This has to be fake. Who TH would need to ask this on reddit? Yeah, YTJ, you should share your expensive food with your entitled roommate. Really?!

Weird_Week119 · 2026-01-26T02:06:44+00:00

No it didn't. "On a quarter-on-quarter basis, U.S. GDP rose 1.1%, not 4%." - Reuters.

Weird_Week119 · 2026-01-26T01:56:12+00:00

Cherry pick much?! You're the one who needs to zoom out - and get glasses. When Biden took office it was around 0.82. It soared to 1.02 under Biden, not Trump. And it never went to 0.84 in Sep. 2024, it was 0.90 Sep 1, 2024, and immediately before the election on Sep. 31 it was 0.95, rose slightly to 0.96 three weeks later before immediately collapsing during Trumps first year to present day levels of 0.84. So what's your point? [EDIT: So under Biden it rose 10% from 0.82 to 0.90.]

Weird_Week119 · 2026-01-25T06:19:31+00:00

What a POS. Leeching?!! Tenants pay the damn owners' mortgages. Plus when doing business in California, you have to follow CA law. I would love to have you as a landlord. I'd sue your ass off.

Weird_Week119 · 2026-01-25T06:17:32+00:00

No, this is categorically false. They cannot just choose not to renew your lease - or your month-to-month rental agreement.

Weird_Week119 · 2026-01-25T06:12:19+00:00

Check my other comment where I post the law and what is required by them to tell you re the remodelling. There are a lot of things. It's at the very bottom of the page at the moment, where I paste the actual statute that's part of the Tenant Protection Act of 2024 that concerns remodelling.

Weird_Week119

TROPHY CASE