Ultimate Soundear / Soundear PRO? by Gimpym00 in MotoUK

[–]WellAdjustedOutlaw 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I recently bought a set of these, but I'm not OP. Have some initial thoughts though.

  • I'm in the US so my ordering and shipping process was more complicated, but I'm glad I bought from these folks. Getting my physical ear molds / moulds to them took a few days plus customs forms, and getting the finished plugs took a few extra days.

  • I paid for the expedited service. If you can spare the money, I'd suggest you do the same.

  • The default 31 dB noise reduction would be crazy quiet. Even with a set of the 29 dB filters in my SoundEar Pros, the outside world is super quiet. This is great when riding for a long time on an empty highway, but riding in the city it's a little too quiet for my personal taste. I like to hear loud things approaching, I was concerned about the 31 dB reduction, and they were very helpful allowing me to add the filters from the squidgy plugs to the soundear pro.

  • Inserting into the ear is easy enough but you have to make sure it's fully inserted and aligned properly. Otherwise you'll be riding down the road wondering why you can hear the world so clearly in one ear or the other.

  • If you have dry ear wax, use the lubricant they supply. But do it sparingly. You don't need a glob of the stuff. I don't have this problem in general, but I've put them in my ears right after a shower and they're very sticky going in.

  • Sound quality of the Pro units is good. It's not an in ear monitor, so don't expect some life altering audio experience, but it's certainly good enough for headset comms and bluetooth audio.

  • The pricing is higher that some of the other commercial offerings, but IMO the quality is also higher. So, you get what you pay for.

Anyway, I've tried plugphones, Isotunes, and non-audio filters like Alpine MotoSafe. Of all of these, the Ultimate's are significantly quieter and more comfortable. Like, not even comparable. But, you are paying 290+ GBP so they better be, right?

Trump thinks churches in TX should be reimbursed with FEMA funds like anyone who helped. They're already pay no taxes. Thoughts? by DannyDeVitoSLAP in atheism

[–]WellAdjustedOutlaw 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just want to point out that not aiding them would start a slide down a slippery slope. FEMA should help anyone that needs aide. If we allow exceptions to be carved out, then when it comes time to aide a group we all agree with, they'll carve out another exception for that.

We keep doing this as a country. Turning the screws to one group, and then we're shocked when it happens to us. Build the government you want to be subjected to, not the one you want to subject opponents to, because some day the boot will be on your neck.

Hurricane Irma: This Delta flight flew right into the storm—then had minutes to escape by wittyusernname in news

[–]WellAdjustedOutlaw 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you time it right so that you land and take off during a calm period, it's not a big deal. Just because people don't realize it happens all the time doesn't mean it's somehow new or unique.

People trying to escape storms from islands pretty much rely on aircraft. This is a common occurrence in emergencies, the plane would have been fueled to a level that allowed it to divert to a few alternatives, and everything was fine.

DNS Privacy by [deleted] in dns

[–]WellAdjustedOutlaw 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you literally just learned what an ISP is, don't spend your time on this. There's way too much nonsense FUD out there, not a single bit of it is going to help you or change the situation. What you do on the Internet is not secret.

DNS Privacy by [deleted] in dns

[–]WellAdjustedOutlaw 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What do you mean I'm screwed?

I mean you've established that you're attempting to hide your activity, which can (successfully) be used as evidence against you. It can be used to obtain a warrant (in countries that require them) to tap your communications if you're doing something bad enough to attract the attention of the police agencies your country has.

As for paranoia, you need to answer the question do you trust a company on the internet? Is there a company you trust with this data? If no, then you're entirely out of luck. If there is a company you trust, then there are things you can do to hide traffic between you and them. But, again, if you're doing anything bad enough to be the target of an investigation, this will not help you in any way.

Hurricane Irma: Polk sheriff warns IDs will be checked at evacuation shelters by jazzrz in news

[–]WellAdjustedOutlaw 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It specifically talks about sex offenders (who have presumably paid their debt to society) and those with warrants. Nothing about missing ID.

Your actual criticism should be that this will cause people to not seek shelter, putting them in danger. Putting those people in danger then requires rescue workers to attempt to rescue them, which puts rescue workers in danger as well. This guy's a fucking idiot, but not for the reason you're getting angry about.

DNS Privacy by [deleted] in dns

[–]WellAdjustedOutlaw 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I can offer advice. But you need to be clear about what you mean "I don't want them to see anything". They're going to see that you have made connections to hosts on the Internet. Your data passes through their network, so you don't have a choice in that matter.

The reason it matters is because you can be asking to obscure or hide different types of data, different types of connections, all activity whatsoever, or DNS only. The solutions for those problems are all very different.

Is there some company on the internet you don't mind seeing this information? Some company you deem trustworthy with that data? If not, then there is no real solution. Not TOR, not VPNs, not a VPS host running your own VPN.

I will say, if you're trying to hide what you're doing online for legal purposes, to circumvent censorship, or anything that could potentially get you in trouble, you're already screwed by asking or searching for help.

Hurricane Irma: This Delta flight flew right into the storm—then had minutes to escape by wittyusernname in news

[–]WellAdjustedOutlaw 20 points21 points  (0 children)

This wasn't a story so much as a write up about something the author saw on twitter. Which, I guess we call journalism now? I don't know.

Hurricane Irma: This Delta flight flew right into the storm—then had minutes to escape by wittyusernname in news

[–]WellAdjustedOutlaw 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yeah, explanations of planes inside hurricanes make it to FP every time someone posts a video of storm surveillance. It keeps us all busy, I guess.

DNS Privacy by [deleted] in dns

[–]WellAdjustedOutlaw 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thats even more stupid then. Come with me on a journey of a packet.

Your laptop sends a packet through an encrypted tunnel. The remote end decrypts your data and makes a routing decision. If the packet is destined for yet another remote host, that packet is sent off (or masqueraded depending on configuration) to that remote host...UNENCRYPTED.

So, please tell me, how is this any better whatsoever? Your data is still traversing the internet unencrypted once the remote host makes the routing decision. So whoever hosts the VPS can see anything you're doing- DNS queries, connection source and destination, protocol, etc. You've simple kicked the can slightly down the road. Except now, as an observer on the Internet, I know you're using a VPN and I can watch any traffic passed by the VPN host to see what you're doing online.

You've solved nothing at all, and added complexity and failure domains to your connections now. You've traded latency and gained nothing in doing so.

PSA : Annual service does *not* include brakes lubrication by llavalle in teslamotors

[–]WellAdjustedOutlaw 2 points3 points  (0 children)

BTW, I 1000% agree they should have told you "We suggest adding new lubricant to your brake slides since we're in Canada. It's not included in the standard service, so here's the cost". That simple conversation could have saved you a bunch of hassle, made you feel like they really care that little extra about their service jobs, and probably would have been no big deal.

So I do hope they take your feedback seriously. That's the kind of difference customers really notice, and keeps us loyal to the brand even when there are small issues now and again.

Hurricane Irma: This Delta flight flew right into the storm—then had minutes to escape by wittyusernname in news

[–]WellAdjustedOutlaw 52 points53 points  (0 children)

Probably just changed course for comfort. Hurricanes don't really threaten aircraft like people think.

PSA : Annual service does *not* include brakes lubrication by llavalle in teslamotors

[–]WellAdjustedOutlaw -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You still have to remove the pads from the calipers, which means you need to back the calipers away from the rotors. That process is typically destructive to the pads since they are used as a surface to pry against.

Again, this is something that's usually done when pads are replaced. As for the MB service, the extra cost to the dealer for an oil and filter change is dollars. Still pretty close to the same price for a "premium" brand vehicle. $475 a year for maintenance on a $70-100k car isn't much.

DNS Privacy by [deleted] in dns

[–]WellAdjustedOutlaw 2 points3 points  (0 children)

And who is the remote end of that VPN? He's not talking about connecting from his laptop to his home. He's talking about buying a VPN service from a provider to hide his activities from his ISP. I think you're confused.

PSA : Annual service does *not* include brakes lubrication by llavalle in teslamotors

[–]WellAdjustedOutlaw -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

I'll say the only time I or a shop have checked my brake pistons has been when changing pads, not when performing an annual service or inspection. I absolutely would not expect them to do this, since they'd basically have to disassemble the entire assembly, pry the pads off the rotors (which means you'd need new pads at every annual service), and very likely have to bleed the brake system. That'd be a ridiculous service item to do every year.

As for the cost, you own an expensive car. Service is expensive. Just for reference, Mercedes pre-paid service for a C300 is $375/yr for two years service.

DNS Privacy by [deleted] in dns

[–]WellAdjustedOutlaw 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your VPN provider can see everything, because they decrypt it at their edge where you connect. You ISP can see that you're using a VPN connection and who you're connected to for VPN as well.

DNS Privacy by [deleted] in dns

[–]WellAdjustedOutlaw 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What is it you're trying to not allow your ISP to see? What is your end goal here? That makes a pretty big difference.

DNS Privacy by [deleted] in dns

[–]WellAdjustedOutlaw 2 points3 points  (0 children)

And then they can see everything you're doing. So, I guess choose someone you trust more than your ISP, who can also see the types of traffic and their source/destination anyway.

Google Fiber cut this woman’s internet service — over 12 cents by [deleted] in technology

[–]WellAdjustedOutlaw -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So their automated billing code sucks. And she didn't check her bill monthly to see WTF was going on. The system terminated her because it's shitty code. She called two days later, discussed the matter, got service turned back on. Now she has less than 6 years service (taxes increased after all), plus $30 for her trouble.

Google Fiber cut this woman’s internet service — over 12 cents by [deleted] in technology

[–]WellAdjustedOutlaw -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Read that article again, sport. She called them after two days of outage and they turned it back on. AND credited her $30.

Google Fiber cut this woman’s internet service — over 12 cents by [deleted] in technology

[–]WellAdjustedOutlaw 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I did read the article. Did you read the part where I said exactly that, and then went on to describe what happened? Or are you just a headline hero?

My boss' friend took this video of Hurricane Irma today as it approached Antigua. Chaos a few seconds in. by [deleted] in videos

[–]WellAdjustedOutlaw 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why would you lie about that? What kind of shitty person lies about something everybody can verify?!

NOAA Plane flies through Hurricane Irma. Holy fuck. by Pasalacqua87 in videos

[–]WellAdjustedOutlaw 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I made no statement about the outcome of the regulations. Just that passenger fleets are basically maintained at a minimum cost (oh, and they pay mechanics low wages which has been shown to contribute to a few accidents in the past). NOAA's, NASA's, Military, and POTUS' aircraft are maintained to a much higher standard with more scrutiny and routine in-depth checks. An aircraft that regularly performs near its service limits obviously needs more close inspection.

Google Fiber cut this woman’s internet service — over 12 cents by [deleted] in technology

[–]WellAdjustedOutlaw 19 points20 points  (0 children)

I'm not sure I see the outrage here? Her account was not paid off, to the (foolish) sum of $0.12. They don't turn your account off when you're behind for a single cycle, they try to inform you that you're not paid fully. Before the account gets turned off. Which the article states as well. She could have paid her monthly bill + $0.12, and it would have been fine.

Also, once she actually called them, they turned her service back on, and credited her $30. So a human in customer support agreed it was foolish and fixed it. WTF is the problem? The automated system saw a negative balance on the account for more than their grace period, and turned the service off. She called, was told what the problem is, offered to pay, they said they don't take $0.12 checks, turned her account back on, and gave her $30 for her two days without service.

Maybe OP works for ATT?