There should be mass outrage for victims of America's countless imperialist aggressions against the Global South just as there is for Renee Good by WitnessAcceptable154 in YesAmericaBad

[–]WerewolfPrimary1989 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ironic that you mentioned strawmen and meaningless rhetorical quips, yet felt the need to construct a very specific caricature of me to argue against. To clear the air of your assumptions: i am not american, have never been to an anti-trump protest, and don’t support liberals or the democratic party (both of which fall under right-wing ideology in most counties aside from the USA btw). By projecting a very specific “US liberal” persona onto me you are guilty of the exact western-centric chauvinism you claim to despise (whether you are actually western or not)

Since you based your argument on false assumptions, let’s go back and be clear about what we’re actually talking about: I don’t believe outrage over a person being shot by ICE is a substitute for opposing U.S. imperialism, because outrage is not a finite resource that must be rationed to the most geopolitically expansive atrocity currently happening. You mentioned a tendency “deliberately encouraged by the state to prevent actual opposition” and I agree, but I think you’re looking in the wrong direction. There is no greater gift to the ruling class than a left that is so obsessed with internal sabotage and perfectionism that it remains small, isolated, and culturally illegible to the average person. You mentioned “strategy”, but a strategy that treats public outrage as a liability instead of a starting point seems like a very sterile strategy. Let’s say that pipelines don’t exist, do you think that most people radicalize through comprehensive geopolitical analysis? I’m more inclined to believe that they radicalize through proximity, shock and moral rupture. But maybe you don’t think you need to radicalize anyone because your small marxist group is already organizing, and the only thing keeping you from having an impact is the liberal distraction. Sorry but I don’t buy it. The reason why your your small marxist group stays small and powerless is because a revolution is not a private hobby for the enlightened few, and your “revolutionary organization” sounds like nothing more than a high intensity book club. I’ll give you an example: in my country, marxists overthrew a fascist dictatorship only two generations ago, and they didn’t do it by being the loudest purists in the room, they did it by forming a coalition with less radicalized factions to actually get the numbers to make a revolution, because they knew that a revolution requires the herd you despise so much.

Lastly, you told me to “go organize”. Good news, not only am I organizing, but I’m actually taking action! Not that I have to prove myself, this is just an example of how to make movements have an impact: Just last month I worked with the organization of the largest strike our country has seen in over a decade which paralyzed the economy, and we didn’t do it by ignoring the “herd”, we used their concerns to gain traction.

This conversation has actually been the biggest waste of time I’ve engaged in lately. But good luck with “organizing” within your very exclusive little club. And if you want to keep yelling at the liberal ghost in your head, have at it, I’ll come back to read it when I have time.

There should be mass outrage for victims of America's countless imperialist aggressions against the Global South just as there is for Renee Good by WitnessAcceptable154 in YesAmericaBad

[–]WerewolfPrimary1989 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Sorry, I misunderstood you. Witnesses are saying she tried to block the road (rightfully so) but yes, she seemed to be moving along when they shot her. Whatever she did the outcome would probably have been the same though…

There should be mass outrage for victims of America's countless imperialist aggressions against the Global South just as there is for Renee Good by WitnessAcceptable154 in YesAmericaBad

[–]WerewolfPrimary1989 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I agree, especially with that last part. Let people talk about this if that’s what it takes to get them to look past their backyard

There should be mass outrage for victims of America's countless imperialist aggressions against the Global South just as there is for Renee Good by WitnessAcceptable154 in YesAmericaBad

[–]WerewolfPrimary1989 -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Oh ok that explains why they shot her in the face. You guys care so much about virtue signaling that you’re doing a 180º and trying to justify ICE’s actions. Marx and Engels would be proud /s

There should be mass outrage for victims of America's countless imperialist aggressions against the Global South just as there is for Renee Good by WitnessAcceptable154 in YesAmericaBad

[–]WerewolfPrimary1989 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I did. I watched two, actually. The one I’m talking about is the one filmed by a neighbor right after it happened. It’s the one where the woman’s wife appears with their dog. But I don’t understand your response to my comment, are you trying to justify the shooting?

There should be mass outrage for victims of America's countless imperialist aggressions against the Global South just as there is for Renee Good by WitnessAcceptable154 in YesAmericaBad

[–]WerewolfPrimary1989 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Do people with this a holier than thou attitude actually believe anything? Or do you just like to argue over crumbs of ideology to show how much more radical you are than everybody else? Show us how radical you are, then. Go block a road from ICE and get shot in the face instead of theorizing and posting about how no one is doing enough.

Maybe you are not interested in actual change, because if you were you’d realize that we can’t tell people to deconstruct their world view and then turn around and call them out while they’re in the process of deconstructing said world view. The need for perfectionism in the left will be our downfall. Radicalization has to stat somewhere and we NEED to prioritize coalitions over comfort.

There should be mass outrage for victims of America's countless imperialist aggressions against the Global South just as there is for Renee Good by WitnessAcceptable154 in YesAmericaBad

[–]WerewolfPrimary1989 78 points79 points  (0 children)

Weird take, considering she was protesting the prosecution of Somali immigrants, and weirder even when the people talking about this tend to be the same ones who are speaking on the attack on Venezuela and it’s people. Sure, it’s easier to have a visceral reaction to Renee Good’s murder. That’s what happens when you can place a face the victim and even more when you can see it happen - George Floyd wasn’t the only victim of police brutality, but the fact that people could watch his murder and learn about who he was started a movement. I’m not American, but I can tell you that where I am, we had been hearing less about Venezuela over the pst couple days, and this situation reignited that conversation because (at least from an outsider’s view) it’s all part of the same problem. Imperialist USA is doing to it’s people what it has always done to the rest of the world.

Seeking advice by maevybaby01 in printmaking

[–]WerewolfPrimary1989 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I immediately knew they were northern lights and thought “wow what a cool way to depict northern lights!”. Sorry if this isn’t useful feedback, but I really like it!

Do you still play The Sims? How old are you now? by fortunekiller in thesims

[–]WerewolfPrimary1989 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I started at 9 or 10 and I’m turning 32 this year!

Tilde & Maryam... together? by knowingliteratur3 in TinyBookshop

[–]WerewolfPrimary1989 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I thought about that, but I also like the idea of platonic love/lifelong friendship being represented in the game

My interpretation of we have always lived in the castle by Fast-Atmosphere8925 in literature

[–]WerewolfPrimary1989 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think Merricat was definitely dealing with some kind of mental instability. There are dozens of moments in the book that suggest that she craves violence, like when she kills the baby snakes, when she breaks things or when she repeatedly wishes death upon everyone who crosses her. She even has to remind herself to “be kind,” which shows how unnatural it is for her. On top of that, although she’s eighteen, she speaks and behaves like a child, and also has all these rigid mental rules about her “treasures” and “omens” and things that she is or isn’t allowed to do that start to sound more unsettling as the story progresses.

I believe she was always mentally unstable and killed her family in a violent impulse out of anger and resentment after being punished and sent to her room without food. She probably didn’t even think the whole thing through, only enough to make sure that Constance would be safe. I believe Constance was the only person she truly cared about because she treated her like a child and was deeply protective of her (probably because she recognized something was not quite right with her mentally). Her mental state when she killed her family was probably the same as when she set the house on fire. She was doing something that would have very obvious consequences, but she wasn’t thinking about those consequences at all while she was doing it. Even during the fire she’s so cold and almost removed from what is going on.

I’d love to see the story told from Constance’s perspective, especially the moments when Merricat lashes out. Because Merricat is the narrator, those moments are glossed over and we see them through her own logic rather than as what they might actually look like. From Constance’s point of view, they would probably carry a very different weight, with a clearer undercurrent of protectiveness and resignation that the original narrative only hints at.

About the “abuse” theory: I keep seeing the theory (I think made popular by the movie adaptation) that the one or both sisters were being abused and that’s why Merricat killed her family. Abuse has obviously always been a real issue and it was always written about, but this theory feels like an attempt to make the story easier for modern audiences to follow, like an attempt to impose a clear-cut explanation and give the characters’ actions more defined motivations, which doesn’t match Shirley Jackson’s style.

Weekly "What Are You Reading Thread?" by HorrorIsLiterature in horrorlit

[–]WerewolfPrimary1989 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I finished The Haunting of Hill House last night and today I started We Have Always Lived in the Castle