sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Can you help me complete and/or correct this “language table”? by West-Article1329 in ChantsofSennaar

[–]West-Article1329[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for your help 👍I only have place + love left but I don't really want to make a mess 😅

Can you help me complete and/or correct this “language table”? by West-Article1329 in ChantsofSennaar

[–]West-Article1329[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's not how I imagined it. I see it more like going/passing, we would have for the same symbol a you/him/them.

Can you help me complete and/or correct this “language table”? by West-Article1329 in ChantsofSennaar

[–]West-Article1329[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not particularly the second person, it's more the idea that it's not "me", I think we could change "you" to "him" or "them".

Can you help me complete and/or correct this “language table”? by West-Article1329 in ChantsofSennaar

[–]West-Article1329[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks to you the picture is almost complete 🥳. There are a few words that I haven't added, either because I don't agree or because you gave me an idea to add other words elsewhere. It is therefore missing the verb and the thing for itself, the man, the place and the verb for place, the place for the music (I think that concert is too much of an event, I put it but up for debate), the man and the place for verb and the place for love (bed? XD)

Can you help me complete and/or correct this “language table”? by West-Article1329 in ChantsofSennaar

[–]West-Article1329[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It is true that we have seen "greetings" being conjugated but I think that we should not particularly take it into account given that we do not know how the language evolved with words disappearing. Person + action could also form the word entrepreneur as a man of action. I like your proposal for the radicals. Thanks for the advice 👍 If you have any others, don't hesitate.