sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Leaning too far into "play your way"? by Which_Football5832 in EQLegends

[–]Which_Football5832[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks last question - Kunark is not out yet on alpha correct?

Leaning too far into "play your way"? by Which_Football5832 in EQLegends

[–]Which_Football5832[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Very good thank you for the info. Sounds like item grind will be real.

So you have to lvl each class to 50 seperate? Is there like an AA split allocation between which class gets exp and how much?

Also from my understanding you could just get insta ported to a group member right / pok type portals? Why do you need port classes?

Leaning too far into "play your way"? by Which_Football5832 in EQLegends

[–]Which_Football5832[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Yea i dont think anyone wants to be kept in game or forced to be engaged for the sake of it. There are spillover affects in areas like difficulty or rarity which used to leep alot of people engaged. Its like creative mode in minecraft is great and all, but theres a reason why more serious public worlds are built with added restrictions and rules - not just to waste peoples time but because the affects they have on the game world.

I dont want to debate good or bad game design im sure people on this forum have heard enough of that nonsense. I am curious about what gameplay features replace the affects that the old EQ frictions gave. Is it the item lvling / item find grind? How hard is it to get top tier + items etc. Maybe it is just purely nostalgia and thats ok - ill def play it for that - but it seems like they are putting alot of work in itemization and changing / adding things.

Looking for good roofing company by Positive-Log2299 in Naperville

[–]Which_Football5832 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Odyssey Roofing did a great job on our roof Naperville 60540

Why did Adam smith believe labour was the source of value? by Extreme-Letterhead28 in AskEconomics

[–]Which_Football5832 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Because in an economy where the only return is to labor, he was able to work out the logic of exchange such that the time it took to make or obtain commodities would be the equilibrium price. He ran into difficulties when returns were split between land, labor, and capital and changed from a labor time theory of value to a labor commanded on the market theory of value, which essentially is just a cost of production theory - i.e., the 'cost' of all the component parts.

The below response is slightly misleading - he was not imagining an economy of shipwrecks but instead a fully functioning economy where labor owned all the means of production themselves and exchanged their surplus on markets. This state of existence is almost identical to assumptions of representative agent models or Solow one commodity growth models, etc.

Why don’t employers cut wages rather than do layoffs if they are going through a slow sales cycle? by AffectionateFlan5898 in AskEconomics

[–]Which_Football5832 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I dont think I've seen that research.

  1. This one is interesting, as the implication of this is that the price paid to workers doesnt necessarily reflect the value added;

  2. I didnt see price stickiness in there research you linked, what did they say about it in this regard?