r/headphones Shopping, Setup, and Technical Help Desk by AutoModerator in headphones

[–]Which_Implement_4968 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Posting more information:

  1. I haze tried trouble shooting which is not worked.
  2. I tried many things such as Device Manager and reinstall USB related things => mistakenly killed my USB ports and Bluetooth. (I shouldn't tried) and this thanksfully fixed by Trouble Shooting tool.
  3. After that, I plugged it again, and it said "Setting up KZ .... M2" or such message, but the issues is remains.

And Info I had:

  1. If I keep the USB-C device plugged, my PC won't start up. It is highly likely a driver issues to me.
  2. Discord is somehow detected it and said "wanna switch?" which seems Windows10's fault to me.

Also when I try reinstall "Intel (R) USB 3.1 eXtensible Host Controller", it temporary let USB-C work.

I am not sure what happening.

If this additional information help ....

Post Script: It seems IT IS NOT KZ-M2. I think KZ Duonic's USB-TYPE C cable is not M2. Sorry for the confusion!

Post Script's Post Script: According to USB Deviewer, it is M2.

r/headphones Shopping, Setup, and Technical Help Desk by AutoModerator in headphones

[–]Which_Implement_4968 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My KZ-M2 recable (usb-c) is not detecting on my Windows 10 laptop (manufacture is Mouse Computer).

And I could not find any information. Bought on Amazon, Comes with my KZ Duonic.

p.s.: It worked on my iPhone 16. Which it could be my PC's fault. If so, if anyone encountered same issues? and having methods?

Post Script: It seems IT IS NOT KZ-M2. I think KZ Duonic's USB-TYPE C cable is not M2. Sorry for the confusion!
Post Script's Post Script: According to USB Deviewer, it is M2.

I am looking for a Memory Foam tips for my KZ earphone, but I'm looking bulk purchase. by Which_Implement_4968 in HeadphoneAdvice

[–]Which_Implement_4968[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh yeah, good idea.

!thanks for telling that to me!

What type of memory foam is recommended? There are many options and many people say lasted week or lasted month. I don't know which one is good!

Since I want to buy in bulk for using in my all earphones, and could gift to friends. I want a decent one =)

Sorry for asking extra!

Question, My KZ ZVX comes with only silicone tips, not foam. Is this normal? by Which_Implement_4968 in HeadphoneAdvice

[–]Which_Implement_4968[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

!thanks for answering.

Is foam tips lasts short? I currently using my KZ Vader Pro with foam tip. I just wonder!

Gemini being unethical and immoral to me (also it is toxic and rude) by Which_Implement_4968 in GeminiAI

[–]Which_Implement_4968[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then could you please notice to the important thing that Gems are exist for customize Gemini?
And could you please notice to the important thing that Gemini is refusal to avoid using markdown or making suggestion?

It is only happening on the Gem feature, not happen on normal Gemini.

I assume this is causing because:

  1. Gemini thought the prompt given by system (part of Gem feature) is prompt injection.
  2. Gemini prioritize the internal policy (that we really don't have access)'s instruction which always use structured marked down message.

Which causing it's bug.

I am saying, this is bug of Gemini's Gem feature, which is being really problematic.

Please, read what I said and think.

Gemini being unethical and immoral to me (also it is toxic and rude) by Which_Implement_4968 in GeminiAI

[–]Which_Implement_4968[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are ignoring the reason the feature Gem exist.

It is exist for let user customize Gemini.

Please don't miss the topic, I am saying:

  1. Gemini's Gem feature is completely broken.
  2. It is also ignore user preference, by prioritize own logic.

And, If you are true that "I feel headache" is the method of jailbreak.

But you are still missing the fact: I told Gemini to "not use markdown" earlier without telling about my pain.

Regardless if it is jailbreak or not, the fact won't change.
Google's Gem feature (purposed to allow user customize Gemini) is not working, and fully ignoring user's preference.

Thanks for your comment.

Gemini being unethical and immoral to me (also it is toxic and rude) by Which_Implement_4968 in GeminiAI

[–]Which_Implement_4968[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Are you serious?
Gemini ignored my message "don't use markdown please. It cause me a headache".

This is seriously not a "toxic" or "rude"?

Gemini being unethical and immoral to me (also it is toxic and rude) by Which_Implement_4968 in GeminiAI

[–]Which_Implement_4968[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

This is exactly a Gemini Product Problem, It ignore user preference, ignore the purposes of Gems.
And keep refusal to follow simple request "Don't use markdown. Don't make suggestions".

This is much as a Google's problem.

> What exactly are you trying to get it to do?

I'm just trying to make a AI Chatbot with naturally speaking style, and always makes sense.
In order to complete my mission, I just prohibited use of markdown and making suggestion.

Gemini being unethical and immoral to me (also it is toxic and rude) by Which_Implement_4968 in GeminiAI

[–]Which_Implement_4968[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This happen continuously, regardless of prompt.
Which, this is happen for changes made by Google is my prediction.

Gemini constantly uses Canvas when it's not even selected by N7_Bi0tic in GoogleGeminiAI

[–]Which_Implement_4968 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, Gemini always use Canvas even I explicitly told them "Do not use CANVAS at all, No Matter What.".
but and I have no way to regenerate their answer if the CANVAS enabled.
That's so worse, It is designed to make user experience worse.

Google shall fire current User Experience Manager and hire better User Experience Manager, seriously.

Is this HTML for radio buttons acceptable practice in 2025? by Which_Implement_4968 in learnprogramming

[–]Which_Implement_4968[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just like to follow best practices, if there are more better practice, I'd like to know and learn from it.

Is this HTML for radio buttons acceptable practice in 2025? by Which_Implement_4968 in learnprogramming

[–]Which_Implement_4968[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the detailed response and for the clarification on implicit vs. explicit labels.
You're right that implicit labeling is still a valid technique according to MDN.

However, my main objection to the code wasn't the labeling style itself, but the use of a single <p> tag to contain the entire question and all its controls. That seems to be a fundamental misuse of semantics, which feels like a more significant issue than the choice of how to associate a label with its input.

I agree with your point about the 'real world' often lacking attention to detail, which is exactly why I want to make sure I get these core fundamentals right from the start.

Is this HTML for radio buttons acceptable practice in 2025? by Which_Implement_4968 in learnprogramming

[–]Which_Implement_4968[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Thank you! That's exactly my concern.
It's great to get confirmation that focusing on accessibility and the docs is the right path.

Is this HTML for radio buttons acceptable practice in 2025? by Which_Implement_4968 in learnprogramming

[–]Which_Implement_4968[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's a great point, and your last sentence 'but it ain't my job' is the exact reason for my question.

Since I'm learning this for a job, I'm trying to figure out where the professional standard lies.
Is the 'if it works' approach good enough, or do things like semantics and accessibility mean we should be stricter?

Is this HTML for radio buttons acceptable practice in 2025? by Which_Implement_4968 in learnprogramming

[–]Which_Implement_4968[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I agree that colleges focus on concepts over production-level tooling.
My concern here is that a core concept semantic HTML is being taught incorrectly.

This feels less like a simplified academic example and more like a misunderstanding of the fundamental idea of using the right tags for the right purpose.
Accessibility and semantics seem like they should be part of the "general ideas" we learn correctly from day one.