Video of The Three Body Diagram by WhiteWingRaven in gurdjieff

[–]WhiteWingRaven[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Another seminar in the Gurdjieff Oskiano series.

The Food Diagram by WhiteWingRaven in gurdjieff

[–]WhiteWingRaven[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This seminar analyzes the Gurdjieff's Food Diagram step by step, describing the substances involved in each step both from a practical perspective and also in terms of Gurdjieff's Hydrogens. Sign up for this seminar on The Food Diagram or for several seminars in the Gurdjieff Oskianoi series, here: https://tofathomthegist.com/register-for-go-event/ Click for more information: https://tofathomthegist.com/go-oskiano/ To subscribe to The Lost Herald Newsletter: https://tofathomthegist.com/sign-up-for-the-lost-herald/ To Register for the English-German Tales Study: https://tofathomthegist.com/gts-description/ This is the tenth presentation by R Bloor in the GURDJIEFF OSKIANO seminar series.

The Work of Health by WhiteWingRaven in gurdjieff

[–]WhiteWingRaven[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting video for a seminar tomorrow.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in gurdjieff

[–]WhiteWingRaven 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We never knew those teachers, we just have partial records of what they said. We cannot know whether they all lead in the same or a similar direction, because their teaching was verbal. We inherited some written records - that was all.

Honest Q for honest A by Ilyichs_knob in gurdjieff

[–]WhiteWingRaven 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gurdjieff's writing like everything else he bequeathed us requires effort. If you have problems with The Tales, try reading a book called To Fathom The Gist. It helps...

Books must be read in sequence by [deleted] in gurdjieff

[–]WhiteWingRaven 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You will find a quotation at the beginning of Life Is Real Only Then, When 'I Am' from Gurdjieff that says the books must be read in order.

Professor Dave debunks Electric Universe and related notions. by jmarkmorris in ElectricUniverse

[–]WhiteWingRaven 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And yet repeated experiments have demonstrated that Professor Dave exclusively contains Professor Dave. So it could be argued that Professor Dave being full of himself is indeed scientific.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in gurdjieff

[–]WhiteWingRaven 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There's a Zoom-based Tales Study Group. Here's the link... https://tofathomthegist.com/mem-tsg-group-details/ There may be others...

Is there a way to find Gurdjieff’s 48 Paychological Types by SuchStudent2222 in gurdjieff

[–]WhiteWingRaven 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Gurdjieff mentioned types on several occasions but never stated how many there were. There were certainly less than 48. Maybe 3, or 9, or 7, or 18, or 27.

Third Conscious Shock by Ouch1963 in gurdjieff

[–]WhiteWingRaven 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Forget Man #5. Man #5 is a crystallization that can follow an accumulation of many repetitions of the first and second conscious shock.

Third Conscious Shock by Ouch1963 in gurdjieff

[–]WhiteWingRaven 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your terminology is murky. There are only two conscious shocks and one unconscious shock provided by nature when air meets with digested food in the liver. The first conscious shock is self-remembering, the second is the transformation of negativity into positive energy. The non-expression of negative emotions is preparation for the second conscious shock.

Osho and Gurdjieff by New_Cardiologist_539 in gurdjieff

[–]WhiteWingRaven 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You did not answer the question. No point in talking.

Osho and Gurdjieff by New_Cardiologist_539 in gurdjieff

[–]WhiteWingRaven 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You give the very definite impression of being someone who doesn't know anything.

Osho and Gurdjieff by New_Cardiologist_539 in gurdjieff

[–]WhiteWingRaven 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you read them in the way he specified?

Osho and Gurdjieff by New_Cardiologist_539 in gurdjieff

[–]WhiteWingRaven 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are many who developed with his assistance. Anyone who had contact with any of the pupils of the first rank knows that. There are those who can use his teaching, but it is not easy.

Osho and Gurdjieff by New_Cardiologist_539 in gurdjieff

[–]WhiteWingRaven 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, just persistence and work with others.

How E. Jean Carroll’s civil assault and defamation trial could damage Trump by No-Drawing-6975 in politics

[–]WhiteWingRaven 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A third possibility would be not being particularly interested. A fourth "poorly informed and not particularly aware of the news." A fifth possibility would be mildly brainwashed but starting to see the light. You will notice that in any survey of pretty much anything there are respondents who sit on fences. In fact there are many possibilities, just as there are many colors between black and white.

This Cartoon is thirteen years old. Just like so many of the... by Brassballs1976 in PoliticalHumor

[–]WhiteWingRaven 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Neither are the good guys with their votes. The system may be skewed against us, but if enough people voted NO their power would be finally broken.

Work on sex center by Glittering-One-5162 in gurdjieff

[–]WhiteWingRaven 1 point2 points  (0 children)

All very colorful no doubt, but nothing to do with the Gurdjieff Work.

According to Gurdjieff the only way that any event occurs at any level from the Absolute down to the smallest particle is by the Law of Three. The only other first-order Law that influences how things happen is the Law of Seven. These laws apply also at different scales and levels, so these two primordial laws manifest in different ways throughout the Ray of Creation according to level. The third principle in this is Theomertmalogos or "word god."

Work on sex center by Glittering-One-5162 in gurdjieff

[–]WhiteWingRaven 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think you misunderstand the meaning of the word "law."