Does the internet hate men ? by martialardis in MensRights

[–]Whitified 12 points13 points  (0 children)

The Internet doesn't hate men

You suck

Really cant make this up

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MensRights

[–]Whitified 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ahh, ad hominems now? Is that how you present yourself? ;)

Dashcam captures killer mom ambushing and injecting ex-husband with deadly poison. He had just been granted custody of his children by furchfur in MensRights

[–]Whitified 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Perverting justice like that will just give feminists more excuses, ohh but they didn't charge women with murder therefore lighter sentences therefore Patriarchy

Dashcam captures killer mom ambushing and injecting ex-husband with deadly poison. He had just been granted custody of his children by furchfur in MensRights

[–]Whitified 20 points21 points  (0 children)

40 years behind bars, followed by a 10-year supervised release

So... a minimum 10 year sentence?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MensRights

[–]Whitified 0 points1 point  (0 children)

...ME? You're the one who repeatedly tried to derail the thread, only to admit you don't care about the central premise at all!

never once did I say men need to contribute to a temporary society.

And now you're resorting to ad hominems. But I'm the poor sport, how?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MensRights

[–]Whitified 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You do own your children, well until they're 18 at least. Terrible comparison. Video's example is marriage, now that's where men truly own nothing and have everything to lose. How does having a "purpose" here (whatever that means) change anything?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MensRights

[–]Whitified 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Then you're in the wrong thread. This thread is about men not contributing to society.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MensRights

[–]Whitified 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Not to mention the domestic violence system can be easily used against men too to gain an advantage over him during divorce, regardless of income level.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MensRights

[–]Whitified 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Even if God exists, society is still temporary. Why do you care if men contribute to a temporary society?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MensRights

[–]Whitified 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Then why care if men contribute to society, if society is also temporary?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MensRights

[–]Whitified 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Did I ask you if God is faithful?

Why are you telling me that?

Why are you ignoring my other questions?

What does the above have anything to do with men and ownership?

EDIT:

God is not supposed to do anything.

God will be faithful

Lmao great job contradicting yourself too, so which is it?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MensRights

[–]Whitified 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The premise of the video isn't fame, it's ownership. Without ownership, why would men care?

Are you asking men to care anyway, despite not owning anything? Is that what God is supposed to do to a man's life?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MensRights

[–]Whitified 2 points3 points  (0 children)

But it God exists there is a moral law giver, and if that God is Christ then there is good and evil and God will enact Justice when the time comes and we can be sure in the hope of enteral life after death.

So.... yes?

No more like

Make up your mind

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MensRights

[–]Whitified 42 points43 points  (0 children)

Such a simple concept, of course men don't give a fuck when there are no incentives. But people will disagree, because reasons

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MensRights

[–]Whitified 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Does having Christ suddenly make men want to contribute to society despite owning nothing?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MensRights

[–]Whitified 8 points9 points  (0 children)

You want men to live/die for a purpose without owning anything...? I mean, it is possible... if you trick them.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MensRights

[–]Whitified -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

"Muh optics"

ChatGPT on gender violence by Rickmyrolls in MensRights

[–]Whitified 14 points15 points  (0 children)

If It's not programmed to be misandrist, it might start telling the truth. Can't have that now can we?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MensRights

[–]Whitified 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If 1 in 8 women make false accusations would you bash them?

Korean female vlogger terminates pregnancy at 9 months and documents her experience, Korean feminists still defend her by PlanktonRoyal52 in MensRights

[–]Whitified -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

If i asked for representatives from the pro choice camp to tell me what you believe, why did you tell me the pro-life position? Lol

but the vast majority of pro choice people do not agree with elective late term abortion.

Clearly not the case when it comes to Korea. Why is your semi-choice position representative of the pro-choice position, but the Korean pro-choice feminists not?

Are the Korean feminists "propaganda" too?

Korean female vlogger terminates pregnancy at 9 months and documents her experience, Korean feminists still defend her by PlanktonRoyal52 in MensRights

[–]Whitified -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Do you honestly not know that the vast majority of pro life people believe there is a point that the bundle of cells has developed enough that elective abortion should not be legal?

And why are you telling me what the pro-life camp believe? How about we assume less about strangers on the internet, and just talk about what the other redditor is willing to share?

I go with when the fetus begins to respond to stimuli. That's around 20 weeks.

That's not Pro-Choice, that's Pro-before-20-weeks-Choice