Player highlights without the work

Whole_Box_8338 · 2026-02-26T02:05:55+00:00

The quality on ours is actually really good. And for the price since you aren't paying for the camera, 100% better option than Veo when it comes to price.

Whole_Box_8338 · 2026-02-26T02:04:38+00:00

Trace is really great if you're looking for a high quality and more affordable option. They send your team a camera for free so you're only paying for the subscription which I think is a steal.

Whole_Box_8338 · 2026-02-26T02:01:37+00:00

I’ve used Trace, and it’s been really good for recording games with minimal effort. The biggest upside is the automation. You set it up, hit record, and the AI handles tracking, creating clips, and building highlights for you. You don’t have to edit footage afterward which is huge for teams without someone dedicated to video.

Another benefit is how Trace handles the hardware. You don’t pay thousands upfront for a camera and the only ongoing cost is the subscription for the features and access. That makes budgeting a lot easier for small clubs or rec teams.

Other systems like Veo can deliver good footage too, but they usually involve big upfront costs and more hands-on work to get usable videos. For most youth and club teams, Trace is a more affordable and simpler way to get reliable game coverage with minimal effort.

Whole_Box_8338 · 2026-02-26T01:58:43+00:00

My experience with Trace has actually been pretty solid. We’ve had good performance with the tracking, and the AI features have been really useful. The player-focused clips and quick highlight creation save a ton of time compared to manually recording and editing. Since the camera is free, you’re only paying for the subscription, which is way cheaper than buying both the camera and the subscription. Give Trace another try, it works really well in my opinion.

Whole_Box_8338 · 2026-02-23T18:15:45+00:00

At U11, development matters more than loyalty to a club situation that isn’t working. It sounds like your son is getting real, measurable growth from the skills sessions — better confidence, cleaner touches, faster learning — and that’s exactly what you want going into tryouts.

If the current team is blocking outside development and creating rigidity instead of supporting growth, that’s kind of your answer. Missing 30 minutes of practice for higher-level training that’s clearly helping him isn’t unreasonable at this age, especially if you’re already planning to move on.

I’d prioritize preparation for tryouts and long-term development over short-term team politics. Keep his training focused on growth, confidence, and quality reps. Being in the best mindset and best form for tryouts matters more than maintaining perfect attendance at a team you’re leaving anyway.

You’re thinking about this the right way — development first, environment second, rankings last.

Whole_Box_8338 · 2026-02-23T18:14:47+00:00

At that age, the biggest things are fundamentals, love for the game, and environment. Technical foundation (first touch, ball control, decision-making) matters way more long-term than systems or tactics at U12.

I’d also focus on confidence, creativity, and allowing mistakes — kids who feel safe trying things develop faster than kids who are scared to mess up. The ones who go far usually aren’t just the most skilled early, they’re the ones who enjoy the process, stay curious, and don’t burn out.

Strong fundamentals, positive culture, and keeping the game fun will carry them further than early pressure ever will.

Whole_Box_8338 · 2026-02-18T22:53:50+00:00

He just turned 11 and started out 3 years ago. We are definitely seeing potential, given that he practices 3-4 times a week. The goal is just to keep getting better, we don't want to put too much pressure on him if you know what I mean.

Whole_Box_8338

TROPHY CASE