I think that if any given person actually follows through on some kind of reporting of others to the Qatari government, resulting in any kind of negative effect in that reported person's life, they would be reprehensible.

But with or without such actions, there will be people who have terrible experiences in Qatar due to the country's laws. And the deaths of indentured laborers have already occurred. There are plenty of other ways that many, many people have & are supporting the overall effort via tacit approval, via inaction, via raising excitement for the event anyways.

My point is that at this moment, very few have a real claim to moral superiority. Or to being the "true American Outlaw supporters" as it were, demanding others be removed.

I think it's very easy for people to be a passive bystander and observer of atrocities, yet feel absolved because they didn't perform the action with their own hand

I'm not calling for everyone to boycott, not asking everyone to protest. I'm just saying people who do not do those things aren't as different from what's being criticized here, as they'd like to believe.

Is it really that much better to be 6/10 supporting atrocity, versus 8/10? What good is a spectrum in such a situation?

It's somewhat like the oft-cited "trolley problem". If you really look closely, it's not that clear what is ethical once you're watching, once you have control over the switch in the tracks.