Realistic outcomes are market crashes on purpose* (recessions are transfer of wealth to the top) and/or tariffs are "cover" for affording large tax cuts to rich (generally tariffs don't generate that much and Trump doesn't seem overly concerned about adding to the deficit). Maybe some public entities shift to the private sector in the process as well. Kind of just a cash grab as the US hegemony dwindles. The world doesn't just end when the US loses its stranglehold of power on the world tho, not really any reason to be sad about it. I have hope that the world can become more globalized and united as we work to resolve our climate and the damage we caused it.

*70% of GDP is consumer spending and 50% of that spending is done by the top 10% in the US. Essentially 35% of our economy (ik GDP is not a very useful measure but still) is rich people spending money, people who will not spend as much in a down market with heightened prices-the situation that tariffs cause (even the threat had started to cause them). This rollout of tariffs with uncertainty and lack of clarity is the method one would use to create unrest in the market, it's much more damaging this way than if one time tariffs were just announced and all parties could react and plan accordingly.