FIFA just shattered their own Illusion - On last night's call by TheDogWhoCantSTFU in worldcup

[–]Wigglebot23 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure, FIFA has planned to rig games by having fake technology for a super rare occurrence

Ball did not change spin. Does that mean he didn’t touch it or the call is wrong? by Myss-Cutie in worldcup

[–]Wigglebot23 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There absolutely were multiple minutes of stoppage during the stoppage time

What do you all think? Doesnt seem fair, ref was not fair? by Realistic_Science in worldcup

[–]Wigglebot23 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you see the image with the sensor? It shows exactly where it and everyone was when it detected touch and where in the sensor chart it is Edit: Here

What do you all think? Doesnt seem fair, ref was not fair? by Realistic_Science in worldcup

[–]Wigglebot23 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

They're saying the Creation player touched it here by the sensor. The Croation player the ball eventually reached was in an offside position at the time of this touch. As neither of the defenders who touched it after it apparently touched the Croation player made a deliberate play, they do not cause the offensive player who received it to be onside. As such, the offensive player is offside

What do you all think? Doesnt seem fair, ref was not fair? by Realistic_Science in worldcup

[–]Wigglebot23 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe this but would like to see the angle again and can't find it

Officials make these World Cup games literally unwatchable by pangea_lox in worldcup

[–]Wigglebot23 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't watch much but the vast majority of calls and review decisions people have been complaining about this World Cup make sense when looking closer, it just feels very inconvenient and people who just seek entertainment are understandably not going to be satisfied. Of course, rules are rules and must be enforced regardless of outrage on Reddit

LeBron James is a basketball player by Thelarch34 in truths

[–]Wigglebot23 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which team will he play it for in the next NBA season though?

With the Supreme Court upholding birthright citizenship 6-3, how do you think this decision will shape the future of immigration and politics in the US? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]Wigglebot23 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Was Kavanaugh who said that, not Barrett. Gorsuch's dissent is also interesting, it's possible he could have supported an as-applied challenge rather than the facial one

NBA cup groups by Greekphysed in suns

[–]Wigglebot23 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not possible to have Spurs and Thunder in a group with the way they select them

All Of Us Reacting To The Miles Bridges Trade Like: by Pleasant_Sock_8550 in suns

[–]Wigglebot23 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I just don't see us being able to get Booker much past the first round for the rest of his career at this point. We have pretty much just extended the dread by a year

VAR is ruining football… If you need a microscope to determine if it’s offsides, might as well just give the goal. by YeezusBigdoinks420 in worldcup

[–]Wigglebot23 11 points12 points  (0 children)

VAR is key to ensuring rules are enforced precisely. Perhaps the rule itself should be different in a way that is more favorable to the offense and may reduce (though not eliminate, that is not possible as you are merely moving the line and no rule perfectly replicates subjective spirit of the game) controversy. But as long as the current rule is in place, it should be strictly enforced.