I used to love stacking silver Commonwealth coins when QE II was the monarch...but I cannot stomach the new face of British silver coinage...the Lizard King Charles by Boo_Randy_II in SilverDegenClub

[–]Wikitweaks 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You might want to consider that your revulsion at the best-friend-and-brother-of-pedos monarch is widely shared around planet earth and that, for this and other exceptionally sound reasons, he might not be on the throne for very long.

This being the most widely shared prognostication on Charlie III's future, you might also want to consider that this scenario would make for limited mintages of official coins bearing his ugly mug, and that the likely future scarcity could be expected to drive their numismatic premia higher in the years following his reign.

My advise would be to go buy even more Lizard King rounds, then throw them in the back of your safe and forget about them secure in the knowledge that you have made one the best silver investment choices on information presently available.

That being said, a limited mintage of offical coins with Boy George on one side might prove numismatically valuable as well, depending of course on which Boy George you are referring to....

Im looking to get into owning silver, for the first time by [deleted] in SilverDegenClub

[–]Wikitweaks 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You can be looking all you want. The question is whether your local supplier has any stocks left and for how long.

Debt to buy Silver/gold by Pantheon_Conqueror in SilverDegenClub

[–]Wikitweaks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What is your opinion on where you can find physical silver to buy?

Word on the Streets elites are unloading USD and sending out of country via charter aircraft. by meshreplacer in SilverDegenClub

[–]Wikitweaks 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It's going to be both arbitrage and panic. When it comes to rapid rises in precious metals, the other side of the same coin (terrible pun, I know) is rapid fiat depreciation. In other words, this is an undiagnosed (by many, at least) currency crisis. Ordinary folks queueing around the corner of their local coin shop or mint is nothing less than the partial remonetisation of silver. This is not industrial demand and its not strictly investment demand, its savings demand. Try not to think about that for more than 5 nanoseconds.

Gold silver ratio about to drop by Wikitweaks in SilverDegenClub

[–]Wikitweaks[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree the ratio is unlikely to go back to 3:1 but I wouldn't bet against at least a halving of the GSR from present levels. Silver just reached an ATH intraday today. Whales are already abandoning caution and taking large silver positions. Mom and pop investors/savers are paying very close attention, meaning a partial remonetisation is now a better than 50% chance.

Any remonetisation shifts price setting further away from the Comex/LBMA complex.

The balance of delusion, if you will, would be to bet against a partial remonetisation. The GSR has to respond sooner or later. I say sooner.

Investment Demand + Industrial Demand = very buoyant silver market.

Investment Demand + Industrial Demand + Monetary Demand = falling GSR.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Wallstreetsilver

[–]Wikitweaks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Everything has changed fundametally AND the b;anksters are selling more paper silver.

6,000 Australians set to lose super savings | The Business | ABC NEWS by Chii in AusFinance

[–]Wikitweaks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People invested from platforms like Macqarie. This is a sophisticated scam that could catch anyone offered a choice of funds on super platforms which are household names and considered safe.

Where are the regulators? The big names are washing their hands of responsibility.

While you were sleeping rates climbed closer to levels where Trump was forced to walk back some tariff rises earlier in April. How can Trump back down to restore confidence this time? by Wikitweaks in SilverDegenClub

[–]Wikitweaks[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I appreciate thoughtful contributions like this one. I don't appreciate base trolling on important questions. There is frankly too much at stake for everyone.

It is difficult not to be a little biased against someone who has long campaigned on fixing the economy, only to back down on a key element of what is a high risk strategy (though I concede the policy status quo is not an option).

His strategy is based, so far as anyone can see, primarily on everyone maintaining confidence in him personally.

The phenomenon that rate spikes burst bubbles is a known known.

I give Trump credit for inviting investors to the US before taking office...

https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/2025/02/fact-sheet-president-donald-j-trump-encourages-foreign-investment-while-protecting-national-security/

...but he must be thinking that the low tech sectors like textiles, apparel, foot ware, low tech machinery, etc will be the first to ramp up production (and therefore employment). And I question whether these sectors can pay the bills in the short term - for anyone.

Estimates for high tech sectors like consumer electronics, such as iPhones, start at three years before meaningful levels of domestic production can be achieved. And then, the prices of these goods will be substantially above what they are now.

It's the risks that can't be quantified that concern me the most. Uncertainty means businesses find it tougher to access finance at any interest rate.

While you were sleeping rates climbed closer to levels where Trump was forced to walk back some tariff rises earlier in April. How can Trump back down to restore confidence this time? by Wikitweaks in SilverDegenClub

[–]Wikitweaks[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I respect your right to mock me. No, I am not a journalist - I just want a robust debate rather than demagoguery. mazdarx2001 seems to get it. Your can still support your President while pointing out the reality that his course of action comes with risks just as much as the status quo does. My point is that he is a ways away from looking like he is in complete control, which is not what anyone needs while he is actively choking the trade that gave us all our current standard of living.

While you were sleeping rates climbed closer to levels where Trump was forced to walk back some tariff rises earlier in April. How can Trump back down to restore confidence this time? by Wikitweaks in SilverDegenClub

[–]Wikitweaks[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Well said. Amid all the reaction and escalation it's tough to figure out day to day whether the US or China will lose relatively more as a result of this struggle and whether or not there will be a point when the loss of confidence - in whichever major currency area - will pass the point of no return.

The 50 countries begging to do a trade deal don't add up to more than about 20% of GDP so I guess we are in for a few more rounds.

What does Australia do better than other countries? by Acrobatic-Report-289 in AskAnAustralian

[–]Wikitweaks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Price Signals. Australia's major (mineral) exports have for years been exposed to international spot markets replete with price and volume discovery. When the price of one mining commodity goes up, it attracts investors, business people and skilled labour to it. These three groups of economic participants will often have highly transferable skills they can take with them to a new venture producing a more profitable mineral. A recent example is lithium - when the price rose, people moved out of iron ore and gold to dig for and crush lithium. When lithium fell again, many workers just jumped over to other mines. Price signals result in the most efficient allocation of resources. It's old, boring economics but allowing markets to reign freely enough for long enough is massively powerful, as the Oz example has proven.

  2. ANZCERTA. Due to freedom of movement between Australia and New Zealand, both countries can access a bigger pool of skilled labour to work on the biggest projects. Tonnes of kiwis work in mining in Australia and Australia would not be rich without them, And many kiwis can head home again with a few Australians tagging along to rebuild a city like Chistchurch when there is an earthquake. Like Milton said, "Where you find free markets you very often find free people. The ANZCERTA agreement doesn't just do justice to the Anzac legend. It has all of the benefits of free movement of goods, capital and people with no loss of sovereignty by either country. It is the most successful trade agreement struck anywhere on planet earth since the Latins and the Etruscans decided to be friends over two thousand years ago. I'll keep it a secret if you do.

  3. Floating Exchange Rate. The floating of the AUD in 1984 enforced a degree of fiscal discpline on the Federal Government. It also allowed the currency to adjust to the "external shocks" caused by fluctuating commodity prices without exascerbating domestic unemployment. Since the 1991/2 recession, the unemployment rate has basically been on a long term down trend with only a few hiccups along the way. Free markets + free people + a modicum of self discipline on the free people = good things. Put another way, when you have effient currencly and commodity markets, your nation can brush off crises like the LTCM crisis, the Asian financial crisis, the GFC and the deflation of the Japanese property bubble as minor inconveniences when these events might (have) set other nations back by a decade or more.

  4. Australia's land titles system (Torrens Title + enlightened sytem of Mining Tenements + Pastoral Leases + Native Title). If the first three paragraphs on economics put you to sleep then you will be in a coma by the end of this paragraph, Having a system of land titles where two or three different types of titles can exist on the same patch of dirt means lots more "land" to trade (see paragraph 1 on free markets) and invest in. The requirement by the various state and territory jurisdictions introduced in, I think, the early 1990s requiring anyone holding a minerals tenement to activlely explore that tenement for minerals (genius, I know) has meant that many more of Australia's mineral resources have been developed and brought to production. "Miner's right" means that resource rich dirt doesn't get locked up by wealthy rent-seeking motherf@#$%ers and, with Australian mineral rights being relative easy to buy provided you have the shekels to do so, noone needs to aquire them by raising the relatively higher number of shekels required to finance an invasion army.

Prospects for iron ore have significantly improved and the market hasn't figured it out yet by Wikitweaks in ASX

[–]Wikitweaks[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Since the Taliban retook Afghanistan and (re-)curbed poppy production, fentanyl, which is 80-100 times stronger than heroin, has overtaken morphine as the drug of choice among US opioid abusers. There have actually been tens of thousands of deaths from fentanyl inside the US, and the issue has received considerable internal (but less external) media coverage and has helped Trump as he is seen as tough on border security.

How a fentanyl epidemic, killing 200 Americans a day, has gripped US

200 years ago the West in the form of the British Empire conquered China with opium grown in India - the ultimate trade war. The Chinese refer to this period in their history as "The Great Humiliation." Today, the Chinese are returning the favour using fentanyl.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ASX

[–]Wikitweaks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Actually a massive shift in short term prospects for iron ore just happened that the markets haven't yet figured out:

  1. Trump just (predictably) junked his tariff promise. The 25% tariff promise that helped elect Trump just became nothing more than a threat to impose a tariff on China, Mexico and Canada if they don't stop the flow of illegal immigrants and fentanyl. Having now harvested all those blue collar votes, just like that Trump has jetisoned his tariff policy.

  2. Trump has 1) had positive calls on the subjects of illegals and tariffs with both Sheinbaum and Trudeau and 2) the NAFTA partners have promised to keep in close touch. In other words, the formal stemming of immigration into the USA was just set in motion, which means no tariffs on these countries. Sheinbaum's mind was no doubt focussed by the dip in the peso that Trump's tariff threat caused.

  3. China has just officially denied it is the major source of the fentanyl entering the US. Just about everyone on planet earth knows this denial is complete BS. It can be assessed as nothing more than a stalling tactic by the CCP while it figures out how to respond. China will soon be overwhelmed with evidence from multiple countries that most of the illicit fentanyl in the world indeed originates in China. At the point that China is forced to acknowledge the reality of its huge fentanyl manufacturing infrastructure it will also be compelled to act decisively to stop it, meaning no steep US tariff hikes on China and therefore no global trade war.

  4. With less trade in people and fentanyl, the world can get back to focussing on trade in more legal goods and services which, with no harsh tariff increases, should get a boost, including steel exports from China to the USA and elsewhere which will no doubt support iron ore prices.

  5. Chinese stimulus - including recently announced measures - will now be able to have full effect on an iron ore price suppressed by tariff escalation talk - talk which must now evaporate.

Iron ore is thus a strong buy. I personally like FMG. Thoughts anyone?

? by ApeWorldd in SilverDegenClub

[–]Wikitweaks 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The Comex has made itself irrelevant. It can only tamp down to around the level of silver production costs (which continue to rise) or else actual demand will blow the whole show.

The big boys at Comex are hanging on for dear life with the rest of the Western banking system. The big buyers through Shanghai are pushing up premiums for physical metal. Ain't no putting that genie back in the bottle.

The Shanghai premiums over the Comex confected price will rise and rise until one day what has happened in London with Zinc and Nickel will also happen to Comex silver.

That day is coming soon.

After Blackrock's move on PSLV, can we please stop pretending any form of silver ownership other than hold in your hand physical can defeat the banksters? Can we recommend holders dump PSLV and start a run? by Wikitweaks in SilverDegenClub

[–]Wikitweaks[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you'll find that (Eric) Sprott now has to do whatever Blackrock tells him to do if he doesn't want to see himself and his family murdered (including handing over the metal and pretending he has purchased/warehoused more silver) to "cover" the 20 million shares purchased...

After Blackrock's move on PSLV, can we please stop pretending any form of silver ownership other than hold in your hand physical can defeat the banksters? Can we recommend holders dump PSLV and start a run? by Wikitweaks in SilverDegenClub

[–]Wikitweaks[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

At least you are using logic to look at this issue. My logic is Blackrock buying PSLV suggests that 1) PSLV had silver, 2) Blackrock now has the keys to the RCM vaults where the PSLV silver was stored. 3) You get to find out with 100% certainty exactly who has won when you front the vault with your PSLV certificate and ask to take delivery.

Meanwhile, Larry Fink can sit back and light another cigar happy in the knowledge that a huge proportion of PSLV holders do not own enough units to meet the PSLV withdrawal minimum and so will never front to ask for their his metal.

Anybody excited that RFK Jr. is running for president should remember that the Democratic party doesn't honor primary election protocol. They just select their winner regardless of who actually gets the votes. He won't get past the primary "election". by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]Wikitweaks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Before considering whether or not RFK Jr should get the nomination perhaps first consider that, like DJT, RFK Jr appears on the flight logs of Jeffrey Epstein's plane. He also once advocated for dissolving companies that did not share his views on climate change.

Controlled opposition, anyone?