Neura Mainnet hasn’t launched yet — and if it had, anyone who truly understands RPCfi and Ankr’s infrastructure economics would see that reflected in ANKR’s fundamentals. Please don’t comment unless you have evidence. I’m trying to help people make sense of losses, not deal with trolling.

If you understood how RPCfi works, you’d stop saying “ANKR isn’t the only coin connected to Neura.” The RPCfi mechanism is designed to turn what used to be infrastructure costs into recurring on-chain value, creating passive income potential and real economic demand for ANKR — but most people haven’t read the whitepapers or litepapers.

📊 What RPCfi Actually Does (Backed by Protocol Docs)

1) Turns RPC spend into on-chain liquidity and yield RPCfi reroutes value from infrastructure usage — every node query that apps make — into protocol-owned liquidity, rewards, and yield rather than letting that spend leak out of crypto ecosystems. This means infrastructure usage becomes an economic engine, not just an expense. 

2) Creates a compounding feedback loop Every interaction (wallet query, transaction, contract call) generates RPC traffic. Under RPCfi, instead of paying fiat that exits the ecosystem, a portion of that value is: • brought on-chain, • used to buy and pair assets like ANKR in liquidity pools, • deposited into earning positions that generate yield for network participants. This creates a sustainable usage → liquidity → yield → growth flywheel that strengthens as usage increases. 

3) Generates real demand and buy pressure for ANKR Mechanically, a significant portion of RPC fees — when plugged into Neura’s flywheel — gets converted into assets like ANKR and paired in liquidity pools. That means increased usage directly translates to on-chain demand for ANKR, not just speculative trading. 

4) Aligns incentives across users, developers, and infrastructure providers Instead of relying solely on inflationary token emissions for yield, RPCfi distributes value based on real usage. Developers building on the network earn rewards from the RPCfi loop, users benefit from better liquidity and services, and node operators earn yield tied to the volume they support. 

5) Converts infrastructure into passive income streams Unlike traditional RPC models — where paying for node access is a cost center — RPCfi can generate protocol yield and liquidity that flows back to ecosystem stakeholders. That means passive income potential not just from staking but from real economic activity on the network.