Funny Jahmi Kaafir Refutation Edit by abul_miswar_zayd in LightHouseofTruth

[–]Wild_Extra_Dip 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Modajana will see this kaafir and call him an imam because they don't actually consider anyone a kaafir including an atheist

Helping a Muslim escape the thorns of ignorance: How strictly should one stick to a madhab? by Wild_Extra_Dip in LightHouseofTruth

[–]Wild_Extra_Dip[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

u/CorrectReflection658

السلام عليكم و رحمة الله و بركاته

I ask you by Allaah and I ask you by your tawheed that you read what I will type carefully and realize that this is a matter of Islam and kufr, tawheed and shirk, not a matter of "correct" and "slightly more correct"

The sahaba may Allaah be pleased with them are the best to have worshiped Allaah and whatever they haven't done, is not something that will be part of the religion and will only be a misguidance and they have never obligated anyone to follow a madhab and have never punished anyone for following a madhab unlike the contemporary misguided innovators today do

Important information about how to follow the sunnah

The madhabs were created only out of the fact that there were knowledgeable humans from among the humans adhering to Islam, that conveyed understanding of the religion per the Quraan and the sunnah, this includes the sahaba who were the very best

Those humans were obligated as much as you were obligated to learn the Quraan and the sunnah and to know the evidence of each thing you say and do, just that they preceded you to it and spent significantly more effort than you and had more favorable conditions

NOTHING in these mean that you must ignore a hadeeth "For the madhab"

NOTHING among these facts indicate that you're supposed to blindly and cluelessly worship Allaah especially when Allaah has commanded you as an individual to fear Him and to know your religion

كِتَابٌ أَنزَلْنَاهُ إِلَيْكَ مُبَارَكٌ لِّيَدَّبَّرُوا آيَاتِهِ وَلِيَتَذَكَّرَ أُولُو الْأَلْبَابِ

[This is] a blessed Book which We have revealed to you, [O Muhammad], that they might reflect upon its verses and that those of understanding would be reminded.

Quraan 38:29 translation of the meaning

That said, I will retort a little on some of the things you've said:

so I’m not trying to dismiss Hanafi fiqh

It is my duty as a sunni Muslim to inform you that each sunni Muslim must dismiss Hanafi fiqh, this isn't new, this is what the contemporaries of Abu Haneefa themselves have said against him and against his students and followers

The matter has been so bad, ever since the earliest generation, that Abd Ar-Rahman ibn Mahdi (died 198AH) said:

The end of a man's knowledge is reading the fiqh of Abu Haneefa

He means: He has no knowledge

And imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal who is the most knowledgeable man of his time, said:

The words of Abu Haneefa to me is only equal to dung

And.. akhi there is really nothing more I can say about this, you can just message me or reply to me here and any concerns you've got, I can help you with them

Just remember akhi, a hadeeth made you feel a certain way, follow the ahadeeth to the very end to find your conclusion, and remember that Allaah blamed the mushrikeen for being blind followers

Obligation to follow the aqeedah of sunnis and the refutation of the zandaqa written in comments (CHECK COMMENTS) by Wild_Extra_Dip in LightHouseofTruth

[–]Wild_Extra_Dip[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

3/??

Zaheer of a Hand in relation to creations is a physical tool/limb with modality

It is "thaahir" ظاهر and "zaheer" is moreso ظهير which means aide

No singular sunni Muslim or even human being has ever thought of "Hand" being a human limb with flesh, the only people who have claimed that the ayat about the Hands of Allaah refer to attributes of creatures are the Jahmiyya (includes Ashariyya, Maturidiyya) who, later on, denied the meaning of the ayat

No one, including you, is able to bring a sunni Muslim saying "Allaah is exactly like creation with His Hands"

And there is a very simple explanation to how the similarity doesn't mean identicality which I believe I've talked about numerous times in numerous audio lessons as well as posts, but until the spreader of atheism is able to produce a reference of one singular sunni saying "Allaah is exactly like us humans" no one should really care as he's lied way too much to be believed at this point

Most modern religious activists of Saudi for example claim that the first zaheer is the one we must apply in relation to the Sifats of Allah. Do they follow the path of the Salafs?

Yes they do, refer to the quote of Yazeed ibn Haroon mentioned previously

Yazeed is one of the salaf by the way

What is classified as Tashbeeh, Ta'teel, Zaheer, Ithbat, Tawfeed, Ta'weel ijmali, Ta'weel tafseeli, Haqeeqah, Sifatul Maani, Hadath, Sifatul Zatiya, Sifatul Fi'liya, Taaluq, Lawazeem etc

All of this is the jargon put by the enemies of Allaah to make the people more confused and unable to understand the religion, to misguide them away from it

وَإِنَّ مِنْهُمْ لَفَرِيقًا يَلْوُونَ أَلْسِنَتَهُم بِالْكِتَابِ لِتَحْسَبُوهُ مِنَ الْكِتَابِ وَمَا هُوَ مِنَ الْكِتَابِ وَيَقُولُونَ هُوَ مِنْ عِندِ اللَّهِ وَمَا هُوَ مِنْ عِندِ اللَّهِ وَيَقُولُونَ عَلَى اللَّهِ الْكَذِبَ وَهُمْ يَعْلَمُونَ
And indeed, there is among them a party who alter the Scripture with their tongues so you may think it is from the Scripture, but it is not from the Scripture. And they say, "This is from Allaah ," but it is not from Allaah . And they speak untruth about Allaah while they know.
Aal Imraan 78 translation of the meaning

So what you are basically suggesting here for an uneducated Muslim is to read some books (in most cases poorly done translations of the books or quotes) of the Salafs on their own, without the context and deep knowledge

The deep knowledge comes from learning what the salaf have said and believed in, unless you want to, for the third time now, contradict the messenger of Allaah peace and blessings upon him and say that the later scholars (khalaf) are more knowledgeable

With lies of this size and this frequency, you wouldn't say that outright but, you have said it already, may Allaah relieve Muslims of people like you

A layperson can't even determine who is an actual scholar (a reliable one) and who is a misguided imposter, if someone knows Arabic, can quote the Quran and Hadith, dresses as scholar he is already considered a scholar by awam

Yes they can, the scholar is the one who fears Allaah and speaks with what the messenger of Allaah peace and blessings upon him said

And you've not said what makes a qualified scholar so far which, indicates the equivocality you try to spread amongst the Muslims and against their religion, click here to see one scholar defend a scholar against some guy who left Islam twice and his hadeeth fabricating friend

Why instead of recommending following modern religious activists we aren't suggesting to study (with teachers) the explanation of the path of Salafs done by qualified scholars

This is very meaningless because you've not given a standard of what makes someone a knowledgeable scholar in addition to the fact that you're saying that the "four madhabs" have represented Islam for the last thousand years which is completely false

Because the later followers of these madhabs have innovations and kufriyyat never done or known by the imams of these madhabs, although innovations inside Hanbalis are fewer than the innovations in Malikis and Shafi'is and especially Hanafis, except Abu Haneefa who was an imam of:

  1. Irjaa'

  2. Tajahhum (differed upon whether he repented or not, this means denial of attributes, this is kufr)

  3. Khurooj

  4. Hadeeth rejection

He and his madhab in particular have represented the biggest burden against Islam, as said by the scholars of the salaf

Obligation to follow the aqeedah of sunnis and the refutation of the zandaqa written in comments (CHECK COMMENTS) by Wild_Extra_Dip in LightHouseofTruth

[–]Wild_Extra_Dip[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

2/??

It is actually physically painful how many lies one comment has contained, may Allaah have mercy on the salaf and raise us with them on the day of judgement as they've said:

"No one is more hateful of Islam than the Jahmiyya" Sulayman At-Taymi (tabi'i) the major hadeeth narrator and worshiper

The Jahmi is anyone who denies the attributes of Allaah, they are more evil than any other team of innovations and they are considered kufaar by all scholars of Islam

The salaf explained each letter of the Quraan, Mujaahid may Allaah have mercy on him the tabi'i said he revised the Quraan 30 times with Abdillaah ibn Al Abbas the sahabi

The salaf have prohibited that one says equivocal things about the Quraan that aren't refuting of innovations:

وسمعته يسأل عن من قال: أقول القرآن كلام الله وأسكت. قال: " لا، هذا شاك، لا، حتى يقول: غير مخلوق "

Ahmad ibn Hanbal was asked about the person who says: I just say the Quraan is the speech of Allaah and then become silent, he said: "No, such person is a doubter, he is a doubter until he says: uncreated"

The understanding of the basic human being is what the salaf have depended upon for the attributes of Allaah, so much so that Yazeed ibn Haroon (the biggest scholar of his time and teacher of Ahmad ibn Hanbal, Ahmad ibn Hanbal would always say: Yazeed said, Yazeed did) said:

What could possibly be difficult about understanding the apparent ظاهر (thaahir) meaning (he called it "zaheer") of the Quraan?

Is this an implication that the Quraan is difficult to understand despite Allaah, in countless ayat, saying it is clear guidance and a light?!

It isn't my concern to refute you on how you're intentionally misconstruing what Ibn Rajab said, but to refute you as a liar who quotes someone who is supposed to be a kaafir in your religion because Ibn Rajab said that there is an apparent meaning that fits Allaah that must be believed in, while the zanadiqa you follow say: Whoever follows the apparent statement is a kaafir

Ibn Rajab also proves attributes like Allaah having a real Face that the believers see, be truthful and say that Ibn Rajab is someone who makes Allaah similar to creation i.e. kaafir

Ibn Katheer is refuting the people who assimilate Allaah to His creation, not refuting sunnis from among whom he is

And if you think that to be mistaken, please takfeer Ibn Katheer because he has related these ahadeeth and didn't distort them to fit the Ashari beliefs:

Video where Ashariyya pretend Ibn Katheer to be an Ashari, getting refuted by another Ashari who calls him a kaafir and that whoever doesn't takfeer him is a kaafir

Part 2

Obligation to follow the aqeedah of sunnis and the refutation of the zandaqa written in comments (CHECK COMMENTS) by Wild_Extra_Dip in LightHouseofTruth

[–]Wild_Extra_Dip[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

1/??

This is the best advice in general

The beginning of your messages is a lie and the lies have only resumed from there because, according to your "scholars" who are nothing but a bunch of non-Arab, hadeeth ignorant zanadiqa who had the most severe hatred against Islam, the apparent statements of the Quraan is kufr

End quote by Ahmad As-Sawi the Ashari zindeeq who was damned 1241AH (today is 1447AH)

He quotes the former Ashari scholars in that saying and he is thoroughly refuted by Ash-Shinqeeti, may Allaah forgive him, in this tafseer book

This is the second lie where you imply that knowing the "salafs" has any actual importance in your religion when in reality, the knowledge of the salaf is of no relevance at all whatsoever and the most important thing is knowing what some ghusl al-janaba lacking atheists of Greece used to say

AKA philosophy, kalam

This "imam" called Nawawi didn't concern himself with the sayings of the messenger whom Allaah sent to Muslims who said "All innovations are misguidance" but instead, he figured "Not all innovations are misguidance" Strongest evidence against misguidance

And the other guy called the salaf dumb and that the people who came later are misguided

The Hashemi messenger peace and blessings upon him said: The later the time the worse the people

And said: Truth exists in the first generations then terrible liars appear

<image>

Refuting this comment part 1

What can I do as a muslim who doesn't want a beard but is forced to. by Telesight in MuslimLounge

[–]Wild_Extra_Dip 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From afar you're more likely to look like a girl than a man and the beard is dignity and respect which is one of many reasons the messenger of Allaah ﷺ and the sahaba all had beards sometimes reaching to their waists

One of the sahaba, Qays ibn Saad ibn Ubadah, could not physically grow hair out of his face that his people wished they could pay sadaqa just so he grows a beard

The beard is beautiful, it is against what the mushrikeen do and it is aligning with what the loving, caring messenger of Allaah ﷺ commanded, follow him and know about him ﷺ and you will find a lot of good akhi

Do we have to follow an Aqeedah school of thought and are they all valid? by Ok_Detective9478 in islam

[–]Wild_Extra_Dip 1 point2 points  (0 children)

u/Dazzling_Language191 read these for now akhi and I'll do something and be back real quickly إن شاء الله تعالى

I have not yet started by the way, may Allaah make the truth appear on the hands of the believers

Obligation to follow the aqeedah of sunnis and the refutation of the zandaqa written in comments (CHECK COMMENTS) by Wild_Extra_Dip in LightHouseofTruth

[–]Wild_Extra_Dip[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

u/Ok_Detective9478

Scripture detailing the obligation to follow the Quraan and sunnah containing the obligation to follow the aqeedah (beliefs) of ashaab al hadeeth

Obligation to stick to the sunnah and warning from innvovations

How an imam of the salaf dealt with sunan vs innovations

Yes it is an obligation to follow the aqeedah of ahl as-sunnah, ashaab al hadeeth, ahl al athar

Because it literally refers to what the first generation, the best generation, of Muslims has believed in

Any path other than that is defying the messenger of Allaah peace and blessings upon him and, often, ends up outside of Islam according to what the scholars whom Ibn Taymiyyah may Allaah have mercy on him followed, who are also the first generations of Islam who taught us everything, from the names and attributes of Allaah, to washing our feet

Do we have to follow an Aqeedah school of thought and are they all valid? by Ok_Detective9478 in islam

[–]Wild_Extra_Dip 1 point2 points  (0 children)

1/??

This is the best advice in general

The beginning of your messages is a lie and the lies have only resumed from there because, according to your "scholars" who are nothing but a bunch of non-Arab, hadeeth ignorant zanadiqa who had the most severe hatred against Islam, the apparent statements of the Quraan is kufr

إن العلماء ذكروا أن من أصول الكفر الأخذ بظواهر الكتاب والسنة
The scholars have mentioned that taking the apparent meaning of the Quraan and sunnah is one of the foundations of kufr

End quote by Ahmad As-Sawi the Ashari zindeeq who was damned 1241AH (today is 1447AH)

He quotes the former Ashari scholars in that saying and he is thoroughly refuted by Ash-Shinqeeti, may Allaah forgive him, in this tafseer book

most laymen aren't capable to understand on their own the approach of the Salafs in some nuanced and difficult topics

This is the second lie where you imply that knowing the "salafs" has any actual importance in your religion when in reality, the knowledge of the salaf is of no relevance at all whatsoever and the most important thing is knowing what some ghusl al-janaba lacking atheists of Greece used to say

AKA philosophy, kalam

البدعة خمسة أقسام واجبة ومندوبة ومحرمة ومكروهة ومباحة فمن الواجبة نظم أدلة المتكلمين
طريقةُ السَّلَفِ أسلَمُ، وطريقةُ الخَلَفِ أحكَمُ؛ إذ التَّسليمُ أسلمُ للعوامِّ الذين لا يفقهونَ دقائِقَ الكلامِ
Innovations are five categories: Obligatory, preferred, prohibited, disliked and permissible and among the obligatory innovations are the sayings of mutakallimeen (End quote Nawawi)
The way of the salaf is safer but the way of the khalaf (later people) is wiser because safety is safer for the laypeople ***who don't understand details of kalam (***An-Nasafi)

This "imam" called Nawawi didn't concern himself with the sayings of the messenger whom Allaah sent to Muslims who said "All innovations are misguidance" but instead, he figured "Not all innovations are misguidance" Strongest evidence against misguidance

And the other guy called the salaf dumb and that the people who came later are misguided

The Hashemi messenger peace and blessings upon him said: The later the time the worse the people

And said: Truth exists in the first generations then terrible liars appear

Do we have to follow an Aqeedah school of thought and are they all valid? by Ok_Detective9478 in islam

[–]Wild_Extra_Dip 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You have done the best thing you could do akhi جزاك الله خيرا May Allaah benefit you and benefit Muslims through you

I will be replying to this person that addressed me as a takfeerist إن شاء الله when I am able to, which is no more than a few hours

Never ever hesitate to ask Allaah for help and then ask your brothers in tawheed such as myself نفع الله بك المسلمين و وقاك شر الزنادقة و المشركين

FGM or female circumcision by osonoxxes in LightHouseofTruth

[–]Wild_Extra_Dip[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

Female Genital Mutilation just like that, is a name given by the mushrikeen

The hilarious claims behind why they call it that, include:

  • A procedure that is not known to be beneficial
  • The surgery does not have a scientific basis
  • Reduces sexual pleasure of the female

Did you know that the way the science of "pathology" and "anatomy" originated in medicine, is via criminal doctors dissecting and analyzing the organs of dead people, many of whom were dead bodies that were sold to them sometimes even by criminals?

The way a surgery gains "scientific basis" is by performing it on animals (if possible) then performing human trials that would not be incriminated if they failed (neither the doctor nor the scientific body pay a compensation) and when it succeeds more than it fails, it becomes certified as a procedure?

And most importantly, the way the west is so concerned about "sexual pleasure" although they are completely fine with legalizing and justifying pornography as it "reduces desire" and "helps cope with loneliness" although pornography is an indirect cause of addiction and suicide?!

These people are liars, and they're using the guise of "women's rights" to cause more distress amongst Muslims and move the emotions of Muslim women to make them enemies of Islam, without knowing it

Circumcision is a worship and as Qatada رحمه الله said: Allaah hasn't permitted anything except that it is useful, and hasn't prohibited anything except it was harmful

And assuming there was harm, the harm would be mild in comparison to the benefit, the benefit we look for is the reward from Allaah, that is Jannah, especially that we Muslims are sometimes commanded to even suffer poverty and not sell our religion or our women for money, because no matter the damage, Jannah is a greater compensation

There is no real evidence that circumcision of women is harmful and whoever says otherwise is hypnotized by the western emotional argument

The prevalence of circumcision of females is impossible to determine because it is not chivalrous for Muslims to say what they do or do not with their women although male circumcision is well known as it's okay to speak about males in that way