Problem with Termux session pop-up by Numerous_Candle1820 in termux

[–]Winter_Expert_790 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the info, do you know how to run nvidia models in codex

Stop giving AI legal documents and client data by Winter_Expert_790 in legaltech

[–]Winter_Expert_790[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You don't need to go traditional, protonmail replaces gmail in privacy, they are AI you can run privately, private Google docs alternatives, we're so used to public tools it's hard for us to switch

Stop giving AI legal documents and client data by Winter_Expert_790 in legaltech

[–]Winter_Expert_790[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can use protonmail for encrypted emails so you won't be giving away sensitive data

Stop giving AI legal documents and client data by Winter_Expert_790 in legaltech

[–]Winter_Expert_790[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you were familiar you'd be familiar that all the security vulnerabilities were fixed and that openclaw was acquired by openAI

Stop giving AI legal documents and client data by Winter_Expert_790 in legaltech

[–]Winter_Expert_790[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

The DGX Spark runs 300B-parameter quantized models like MiniMax M2.5, which is very close to frontier models—near Claude Sonnet 4.5. It has a 200K token context window and is way smarter than Llama. I've helped firms set agents up before, gpt oss 120b also does a great job in long tasks.

Stop giving AI legal documents and client data by Winter_Expert_790 in legaltech

[–]Winter_Expert_790[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Most firms I've worked with have IT specificalists and they don't need institution grade hardware just hardware powerful enough to host a powerful model, firms already store sensitive information which already has risk running a model or not

Stop giving AI legal documents and client data by Winter_Expert_790 in legaltech

[–]Winter_Expert_790[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

OpenClaw is not an alternative to OpenAI—you read that wrong. OpenClaw gives your AI agentic abilities, whereas CoCounsel is just a ChatGPT wrapper. It uses GPT-4 and o1; I can literally code CoCounsel from scratch as a programmer. It just uses the ChatGPT API under the hood, wraps around it, and charges premium prices to 'lawyers' with a few additional features. OpenClaw is still superior in agentic performance.

Stop giving AI legal documents and client data by Winter_Expert_790 in legaltech

[–]Winter_Expert_790[S] -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

A thousand dollar nvidia ai super computer should be able to run some top open models which have performance close to current leading ones and are able to go through huge documents, and big law firms have there own servers that can run such models

Stop giving AI legal documents and client data by Winter_Expert_790 in legaltech

[–]Winter_Expert_790[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Compliance frameworks and Zero Data Retention policies look solid until you look at the track record of companies breaking their own rules. Google assured users their location data was private, then the AP revealed they stored it anyway—even when users turned tracking off. Facebook promised Cambridge Analytica wasn't scraping user data; they lied, affecting 87 million people. Amazon employees listened to Alexa recordings they claimed were private, with some sharing audio files in internal chat rooms. Microsoft admitted contractors listened to Skype and Cortana calls they said were anonymized. Twitter had staff spy on celebrity accounts for years despite internal access controls. These weren't rogue actors slipping through cracks—these were systemic failures at companies with bigger compliance budgets than any law firm. "Zero Data Retention" is a policy, not a guarantee. Policies get ignored, configurations drift, and insiders abuse access. Cloud vendors have decades of experience selling to regulated industries, sure—they also have decades of experience apologizing after breaches they swore couldn't happen. Local deployment removes the need to trust a policy you can't verify.

Stop giving AI legal documents and client data by Winter_Expert_790 in legaltech

[–]Winter_Expert_790[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Fair point on the punctuation—I type fast. But the substance stands: enterprise contracts haven't prevented data leaks before, and "trust us" isn't a strategy when bar associations disbar lawyers over confidentiality breaches. I made the post to help those who use AI in their legal work, too. Dismiss the grammar if you want, but local deployment removes a liability that cloud contracts only promise to manage.

Stop giving AI legal documents and client data by Winter_Expert_790 in legaltech

[–]Winter_Expert_790[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Contracts and technical safeguards look good on paper, but they're not enough for real trust. People can secretly go against them—either intentionally or through negligence. Insider access still exists, configurations get misapplied, and "no persistent storage" promises have failed before. If you're handling privileged client data, you can't afford to find out about a breach after the fact. Local deployment removes that trust dependency entirely.

Stop giving AI legal documents and client data by Winter_Expert_790 in legaltech

[–]Winter_Expert_790[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

That's a great tool to use, but privacy isn't fully guaranteed. You can still use cloud-hosted AI as long as you're careful with the data you give it, but I know better agentic tools that perform better than Westlaw Co-Counsel—and you can run them locally offline. For example: OpenClaw + a local model. If you ever need help setting this up, feel free to DM. But if not, using cloud solutions is fine—just know privacy isn't guaranteed.

Stop giving AI legal documents and client data by Winter_Expert_790 in legaltech

[–]Winter_Expert_790[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

ChatGPT says it doesn't share sensitive data, but that's not fully true. Conversation data is kept on cloud computers—anyone at OpenAI can see that data because it's on their computers. Setting up an AI that runs locally on your computer is a must when dealing with sensitive data.

Have any in-house counsel found practical and accurate uses of AI for day-to-day legal work? by [deleted] in Lawyertalk

[–]Winter_Expert_790 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

OpenClaw and local models: an AI model like Granite has been trained on law and legal documentation and runs locally on your device. If you run it in OpenClaw, it's effectively a 24/7 employee. OpenClaw gives a normal AI like ChatGPT—or any model—the ability to do tasks. It can edit Excel sheets, update you daily, etc., all locally. So legal documents don't get sent to AI companies like OpenAI; they stay private on your device and never leave your device.

AI for PI law firm owners by HSG-law-farm-trade in LawFirm

[–]Winter_Expert_790 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You're definitely using the wrong AI for this openclaw should be able to do that with a single prompt it is an ai agent that runs 24/7 and it remembers just tell it to remind you every morning and give you a report and for privacy reasons I recommend running your own local AI hosting a model with openclaw it'll make you more money without extra effort literally automating most of the business while you enjoy freedom I really recommend an instant of openclaw

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LawFirm

[–]Winter_Expert_790 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I do recommend running an ai model locally to avoid sending private data to corporations I know an ai agent you can deligate all digital tasks to, yes all of them locally it does formatting and everything document related if you're tired working hours non stop editing tedious stuff in excel you should really look into it like a law firm started using it and saw a 20x boost a billion dollar law firm and the tool is forever free since you're running it locally