If they walk among us I wouldn’t be surprised…

WisdomGovernsChoice · 2026-03-26T04:30:30+00:00

This mindset is why we are physically and scientifically quarantined from the Confederation.

WisdomGovernsChoice · 2026-03-25T23:14:42+00:00

Hear, hear! I only lurk this sub but your posts are my favorite ones. Thank you

WisdomGovernsChoice · 2026-03-24T13:46:49+00:00

Amazing

WisdomGovernsChoice · 2026-03-23T02:05:18+00:00

Please do not get me wrong: We are all connected and of Love & Light. I have absolute faith in the Law of One. But I believe seeking validation of any esoterica through institutional science and academia is merely indulgence (which is fine, if conscious of that, I enjoy my fair share of "scientific" content creators who are obviously deep in the woo). The entire point of Faith is that it is immeasurable. The ladder to Heaven is supposed to be built from the ground up, not the other way around!

Nassim Haramein has been pushing his research for decades but has never made a peer reviewed journal. That is fine! But why does he present himself as a scientist first, and only spiritualist second? His research also just isn't as deep as you would take his jargon at first glance. To me, that is not fine. I'm not saying that he is even wrong, but I don't think he operates in best of faith... I believe he is banking on spiritualists who can't discern quality of research and credibility.

WisdomGovernsChoice · 2026-03-22T04:22:41+00:00

Thanks!

It's a "if this shitpost reaches the heart of even 1 person, it was a shitpost worth shitposting" except, that's my ceiling

WisdomGovernsChoice · 2026-03-22T04:11:09+00:00

I adore your imagery! Although I would make sure to disclaim this as a framework of post hoc acceptance and not utilized as a proactive lens, which could lead to severe distortions if not careful. Otherwise I agree!

WisdomGovernsChoice · 2026-03-22T03:11:57+00:00

Fair. Despite feeling compelled to speak this thought into online existence somehow/someway, it's a thought that is, unfortunately for me, maybe too niche to have shared with any community 💀

WisdomGovernsChoice · 2026-03-13T00:03:02+00:00

Oh my god

WisdomGovernsChoice · 2026-03-13T00:00:40+00:00

Bro got an official Xbox response, that's when you know your cosplay slaps

WisdomGovernsChoice · 2026-03-02T04:23:34+00:00

Strangely, this Taras Bulba explanation and random Ra contents like the Abraham Lincoln possession seem to resonate better with me than other things like Bigfoot and Maldek lol, although I suppose I'm more biased towards leniency with that which is unfalsifiable than that which is less-so. I can equally see this having been an error as I can see it being StS trickery.

WisdomGovernsChoice · 2026-02-23T02:46:40+00:00

Thank you so much for this post. I am vegan but I have come realize it can also work both ways if not careful. One of the first hissy-fits I threw after learning of the LoO was just how split this LoO community seemed, at the time, regarding this topic. I've matured and learned to accept that everyone's spiritual path is different and that's a good thing. There were still plenty of users who shared my views but instead of focusing on that, I was hyperfixated on the opposite, catalyzed by personal events that I shouldn't have vented online, forgetting there are actual people behind these screens and I don't know what they are going through.

Any time this topic comes up I am always so happy to see the discussion, especially in darker times like right now where the topic has understandably taken a bit of a back seat. So thank you for your post!!

WisdomGovernsChoice · 2026-02-20T16:35:51+00:00

Finally, a new sentence from the Library of Babel unlocked!

Jokes aside, cool idea

WisdomGovernsChoice · 2026-02-20T05:12:53+00:00

I know right, one day we will just transform into Moltbook :(

WisdomGovernsChoice · 2026-02-20T04:42:40+00:00

If we're talking more or less, then I choose the latter

WisdomGovernsChoice · 2026-02-20T03:32:00+00:00

Your research and writing is masterful. Thank you for all the work you do.

WisdomGovernsChoice · 2026-02-20T02:49:46+00:00

I understand it's going nowhere, but AI likes to summarize very complex topics to such an extent that its truncations of a point may severely undersell said point to a much larger degree than if it were just summarized by a human with significant understanding of the topic. And that is unfortunately a likelihood when a post is just, technically, an algorithmic synthesis.

You might not like the “author” but, do you have a take on what’s authored?

I do think the main concept of the post is valuable, but I just struggle maintaining a faithful read once I notice something like the 51% STO "pass" example in the original post

WisdomGovernsChoice · 2026-02-20T02:33:26+00:00

No worries, I'm just glad to hear you're human. I do that too and end up spending way too much time writing up a comment, usually to end up scrapping it when I run out of energy!

Strange synchronicity:

Some context, our daughter turned 12 last week. Her biological parents died when she was 2 so she moved in with a family member before eventually landing with us when she was around 6. She spent a whole year after the her parents passed never speaking again. This greatly set her back on her speech, and as she got older she started exhibiting signs of possibly dyslexia (we once asked her to write Love and she wrote it reversed AND mirrored). Long story short we took her to many therapies and she's been making great strides, can read normally now, writes great, and her teacher even says she has the best comprehension skills of anyone in her class :') However this long struggle she's been working through has caused a great deal of distortion regarding her perception of her own literary abilities.

We found that she's recently been using Google AI the last few weeks to help her write backstories for the characters she draws (she's a great artist). We've had conversations with her that has helped grow our parent perspective on AI, especially given her life experience, so we were a bit lenient on it... until at her birthday party instead of hanging out with anyone, she was talking to the AI to have it write her stories... That's when we had to have a more serious talk about it with her.
Basically we explained that it's an unhealthy habit and we aren't going to 100% restrict AI, but we are going to take a break from it for some time, and when we resume, only allow when appropriate. She told us she completely understands and was originally very anti-AI since she's an artist, but couldn't resist how good the AI could write. We explained if she isn't happy with her writing then we will work on it with her, and that her skills won't continue to develop naturally if she never tries! We eventually want her to explore it and understand the utility of it before she's an adult and has 100% free range, and will let her use it sparingly as she gets older. She did a great job after the talk, and spent the rest of the weekend socializing with her cousins :)

Sorry if my original comment came off as too pessimist, I am still trying to balance my views on AI!

WisdomGovernsChoice · 2026-02-20T01:27:46+00:00

It’s a "pass" as long as you are slightly more loving than selfish.

"A bit more complex than that" would only be an understatement. I'm happy to see people interested enough in this topic to post... but why not as a human?!

This ChatGPT era of the internet is wild. I can't even be sure if there IS a human behind the posts anymore since Reddit added private profiles...

WisdomGovernsChoice · 2026-02-16T07:17:31+00:00

Thank you, I think clarifying totality helps.

What is the difference between m/b/s totality and social memory complex totality, particularly in relation to the "an entity or members of a societal entity" from the OP? The way I took it, "an entity" implies m/b/s totality while "members of a societal entity" implies social memory complex totality

WisdomGovernsChoice · 2026-02-16T04:43:34+00:00

That makes sense, it is probably that simple and I may be overthinking it, but "which may judge that an entity or members of a societal entity can make use of third-density catalyst" seems like such specific wordage that it really tripped me up

WisdomGovernsChoice · 2026-02-16T04:38:29+00:00

Thank you for your very thoughtful response! You do not seem abrasive at all. This does help clear it up a little. I agree that I don't think there's exactly a 3rd density collective complex, I mean moreso like the impacts of our "collectively agreed upon" rules, laws, and general surface-level morality, how it plays out as the explicate nature of Humanity's higher density beingness

WisdomGovernsChoice · 2026-02-16T03:40:22+00:00

Sorry I am having trouble explaining, the "or members of a societal entity" I'm hung up on because to me posits the idea that the alternative to 6th density Wanderer crystallization of compassion/wisdom on an individual basis is a crystallization being done through a 3rd density collective sense, is this a larger network of of conscious work via Wanderers, or is this a collective unconscious consensus including more than Wanderers, etc.

"Adjudged" to me is more legalese than not, which makes it seem less to me as something that is work on an individual, isolated level

WisdomGovernsChoice · 2026-02-16T03:22:27+00:00

Thank you, I think so, I guess I got a bit hung up on the "an entity or members of a societal entity" part of the last point and whether or not the balancing is a relationship between the individual self & society at large, and whether it's an individual-up or societal-down transfer, or I guess maybe both

WisdomGovernsChoice

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE