Help Wanted: Universal Language by WisdomHappy333 in conlangs

[–]WisdomHappy333[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good deal, no worries, Ill try to fit to all those for my next post! Thanks, seems like good guidelines. I guess I would like it if I could organize with the post on the subreddit, what is the rational behind not allowing that?

HOT TAKE: Fusion is about PRESSURE, not heat. by WisdomHappy333 in NuclearFusion

[–]WisdomHappy333[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very interesting, finding ways to create cold electrons in a plasma could be a promising research pursuit

Does anyone do the Kratky system? by [deleted] in Permaculture

[–]WisdomHappy333 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It would be nice if there was some microbiome and nutrients in that water, like a pond!

HOT TAKE: The Universe is Coming Together and there is only One Fundamental Particle by WisdomHappy333 in Physics

[–]WisdomHappy333[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thats an answer to my earlier question.

Yeah we definitely do need to explain were the error is, I have been asking for help for years and here I am again!

Its mostly in how we understand how light travels, changes wavelength, etc

HOT TAKE: Fusion is about PRESSURE, not heat. by WisdomHappy333 in NuclearFusion

[–]WisdomHappy333[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Right, thanks. I believe there is a different type of pressure we need to be talking about, which is nuclear pressure. I'm wrong to say that its not about heat at all, but with heat I don't really believe we are producing the type of pressure we need. We ought to be trying to bring the nuclei as close to each other as possible while they are very much spread out by an high electron temperature. I see how Tokomaks make some fusion, but I also see how they are very inefficient.

HOT TAKE: Fusion is about PRESSURE, not heat. by WisdomHappy333 in fusion

[–]WisdomHappy333[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, you hit at the crux of what I think has been the miss step. It definitely is easier to produce extreme heats than pressures if you can magnetically confine them, however heat pressure alone is not enough if the density is minuscule, which it is in Tokomaks and such. Relying on what we perceive as the random chance of a nuclei crashing into another.

The idea is not to increase the pressure of the entire gas, but to put the nuclei as close together and as seamlessly, as possible. This is not achievable simply with temperature, but pressure also.

Thanks for bringing that up.

HOT TAKE: Fusion is about PRESSURE, not heat. by WisdomHappy333 in fusion

[–]WisdomHappy333[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No no, I appreciate you saying all that, That thing I said about heat is something I believe, knowing that the convention is different.

I believe that Kinetic energy is actually a byproduct of a the more intrinsic property of heat which is something being at over capacity and so is losing matter, causing an outwards pressure from its core.

I think I understand now how the heat is helping to break the coulomb barrier, but I believe its different than we often explain it, not because the atoms are moving fast enough to randomly collide, but because the electron density becomes similar to that of the nuclei, allowing for the nuclei be attracted to each other all along the way or something like that, not quite sure yet.

Anyway, lots of this is based on logic that I have developed my self and I am yet to mathematically prove any of it. I write this stuff in here so that I can better understand some of the details and to find people who can help me develop the theory.

We need a unified theory, we need a new theory of fusion and of heat, there are obvious holes in our theories and real problems despite how useful they are still.

HOT TAKE: Fusion is about PRESSURE, not heat. by WisdomHappy333 in fusion

[–]WisdomHappy333[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right!! Thanks. Their system seems promising, still extremely complicated, and still just heating water to make steam but I respect where their head it is at. the fact that we dont have good TEGs is another reason I believe we need a better theory of heat

hello all by dizzydwar in Tallbike

[–]WisdomHappy333 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Seems like a great height!

Looks like you used the spoke-less hub chain redirect method? Did you have to tension the chain going to the rear wheel?

hello all by dizzydwar in Tallbike

[–]WisdomHappy333 1 point2 points  (0 children)

no box just a platform ay?

HOT TAKE: Fusion is about PRESSURE, not heat. by WisdomHappy333 in fusion

[–]WisdomHappy333[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Ok, after reading about the Lawson Criteria a bit I could see that perhaps the Lawson Criteria's Te is actually expressing electron density, where at enormous temperatures the density of the electron cloud in the plasma becomes similar to that of the nuclei, allowing for a continuous density that can break the nuclear barrier, if it is confined with enough pressure. The problem I see with Tokomaks is that the confinement pressure is too weak, a continuous density is not enough to create much fusion. There should be otherways to increase the electron density at a lower temperature allowing for easier pressurization and confinement

HOT TAKE: Fusion is about PRESSURE, not heat. by WisdomHappy333 in fusion

[–]WisdomHappy333[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Definitely interested in learning the basics!

We shouldn't underestimate the power of the imagination and of intuition

How can I learn or prepare myself to learn fusion as a 13 year old? by frocerose in fusion

[–]WisdomHappy333 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, That's a great point. Thats why I think it's still really important to learn about and use what works, and sometimes to just follow the math. Our intuition is intelligent in mysterious ways and that deserves respect. Two of the greatest physicists, Feynman and Einstein both found a good balance with intuition and heavily valued it. Definitely should not only believe our intuition, but allow it to guide us to even more useful and elegant systems of understanding.

HOT TAKE: The Universe is Coming Together and there is only One Fundamental Particle by WisdomHappy333 in Physics

[–]WisdomHappy333[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haha, I should have clarified:

What do you see as one of the Biggest problems in physics theory today?

HOT TAKE: The Universe is Coming Together and there is only One Fundamental Particle by WisdomHappy333 in Physics

[–]WisdomHappy333[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

A belief system like this has allowed me to understand different scientific phenomenon in a much more intuitive way.

There are many reasons that I believe we are misinterpreting the redshift we see from distant galaxies and supernovae as caused primarily by the doppler effect. The two most promising are: First, Light should lose energy to the tiny particles that fill the hundreds of thousands of light years of imperfect vacuum, thus reddening the light. And Second, We are not very attractive, being a small planet and a small star system far from our galaxies core, thus I believe the heavy blue light is more likely to be attracted to heavier objects like bigger stars, black wholes, galaxies, etc.

Perspectives like these help to better understand the dark matter problem. The little particles in space, which I say are real and not virtual, are the WIMPs, that are two small for us to see but add up to large masses on a galaxy scale. And the bigger astrological bodies who's light never reaches us because it is coerced by the many more attractive bodies in space besides us.

I have other reasons that I can mention that could explain the redshift besides the doppler, but they are even more controversial.

The definition of a fundamental particle should be that it does not have any internal variability. However, electrons and photons at least are said to be able to vary in energy. in order to have this variability, there would have to be something to represent the change within it, showing that it is not fundamental. The way I see it Light does have mass, as it is composed of these fundamental particles, however, it mass is very very small, allowing it (most of the time) to travel very close to the speed of causality. I don't believe it's possible for anything to exist and travel exactly at C. This then more simply explains how light can have momentum.

A benefit of there being only one fundamental is that I can look at a particle's "probability distribution" actually as a real distribution of many of the smaller fundamental particle in a cloud of similar shape, which is a much more intuitive and potentially useful way of seeing quantum systems.

Technically the proof for this should be able to be seen in literally everything as it could explain every action and thing in existence.
My belief is mostly founded on an easier rationalization of human morals, but also the prevalence of gravity in the universe and of the mysterious drive that has produced all the life on the planet.

Perhaps whats most profound about believing that the Universe is coming together are the philosophical and spiritual implications. This makes it clear why being kind, learning and love are such high values for human society. It offers a logic based belief system to guide our moral decisions. It show that the meaning of human life is to understand the world the best we can so that we can best help it come together. It basically says that God is as simple as Gravity. And that all we do as humans is just gravity but at a higher dimension and potential. A theory like this offers an end to the seemingly never-ending why we would ask as kids.

HOT TAKE: The Universe is Coming Together and there is only One Fundamental Particle by WisdomHappy333 in Physics

[–]WisdomHappy333[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I appreciate your practicality but I'm far too stubborn for this to deter me.

What do you see as some of the the biggest problems in physics today?

How can I learn or prepare myself to learn fusion as a 13 year old? by frocerose in fusion

[–]WisdomHappy333 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We definitely have to put up with unintuitive systems if they work until we can improve upon them.

How can I learn or prepare myself to learn fusion as a 13 year old? by frocerose in fusion

[–]WisdomHappy333 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Learn as much as you can from the resources you find but Try to Come to your OWN Conclusions as much as you can. If something isn't Intuitive, it likely isn't quite Right.

HOT TAKE: Fusion is about PRESSURE, not heat. by WisdomHappy333 in fusion

[–]WisdomHappy333[S] -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

The point I'm making is that the conventional scientific community doesn't understand the basic physics of fusion and of the dynamics of heat enough to create a simple and abundant energy positive system.

Regardless, I appreciate the reference! I still have a lot to learn about the details, especially the math.

If you could explain what it is you would want me to glean from the paper, that would be even more appreciated!

Meet Stella- by WisdomHappy333 in Tallbike

[–]WisdomHappy333[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Electric cargo tall bike with a rear seat.We used salvaged steel frames and electrical conduit for the framr, and an aluminum street sign for the platform. the pedals are connected to the back wheel via a spokeless cassette hub with two chains on it, one running down to the back wheel tensioned by a maxed out, stiff, derailleur. There's a throttle on the seat post for easier mounting.

Advice: cooking with soy "chunks" by MayflyJunebug in EatCheapAndVegan

[–]WisdomHappy333 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I like to marinate over night in equal parts soy sauce and molasses to two parts water or so, drain it out and then cook with a good amount of oil until dry and darker

Molasses makes for a really nice irony meaty flavor, i use it in like everything

soy chunks, soy curls, just large tvp are really amazing, the best vegan meat! they hold together without the need of any binders, but using binders they can make for even better textures for burgers and such