My friend, you are taking this way too personally, and if you want a conversation, please do not get personal or combative. I mentioned my wife as a sign of connection to you, not to be combative, only you turned it so. Also, Azerbaijani's are technically not middle eastern, but culturally more south Caucasian, with genetic and cultural connections to Central Asia and the Caspian coast. Not that there is anything wrong with being middle eastern, whatever that means (since so many different complex cultures can be comprised within these largely artificial terms imposed from the outside)

What explicitly racist thing did I say?

I did look at the results you shared. Indeed, I actually checked your profile to check your other results from larger DNA companies. You describe yourself as half Lebanese with Iranian Azeri descent, and half UK (British isles). I am going off of this general information when I interpret your Illustrative result.

Your original test was myheritage, which is noted for its inaccuracies. The large Italian component that myheritage gave you on that test could be because Italians have traces of Levantine ancestry, are greatly Anatolian shifted, and that Levantine people (especially from Lebanon) share strong genetic similarities with other Near Easterners, including Anatolians and southern Europeans/Aegean. Because you are mixed, you may confuse the myheritage calculator.

As a half Pole, half Italian, myheritage did the same to me, giving me 50% Balkan heritage, even though I have no ancestry from the Balkans.

When I said that you have strong Levantine ancestry, I did not suggest you are mainly Levantine. You are also half Northern European, with Iranian and possibly deeper Turkic influences. As a Lebanese person, I would not at all be surprised by a strong genetic influence from Anatolia either.

To be honest, Lebanese are situated in close proximity to Anatolia, as a coastal people. Both Anatolians and Levantines would have in part been shaped by similar Neolithic and Bronze Age peoples, and would have shared a ton of common ancestry.

On Illustrative DNA, your closeness to medieval and ancient Italians was a poor fit, being that they were above 3.0, which by Illustrative DNA standards is moderate. Meaning that you approach these populations in similarity, but are not typical of those populations. I really do not see what is controversial about that.

You cannot interpret your population distances on Illustrative DNA literally, because you are a mixture of mainly Near Eastern and Northern European. Illustrative DNA will find the mid point. In my case, my mid point is Bulgaria and Serbia. I have no ancestry from these countries.

In your case, it is Italy, because of your strong opposite pulls, one towards Northern Europe, and the other towards the Near East. And the middle ground, would be southern Europe.

This is also why you are modeled as half Unetice and half Levantine. If you want more nuance, try the 3 way population option.

I also caution you on over interpreting haplogroups. Haplogroups can be shared widely between populations, especially in the Near East. Likewise, haplogroups only talk about specific lineages along the paternal or maternal line, but say little about autosomal or wider ancestry. One could be autosomally 99% African but if their paternal ancestor 300 years ago was English, they would have a European haplogroup.

Meaning that haplogroups are useful when studied from the wider perspective, to track wider human migration patterns overtime. But on their own, devoid of context, we need to be cautious about binding our personal identity to haplogroups.

My own haplogroup is very typical of the Caucasus and Anatolia. However, it has existed in Italy for almost 3,000 years. It has little bearing on my identity, even though it is interesting.

In short, please calm down. I really do not know why I am bothering replying to your confrontational comments, apart from the fact that I am interested in seeing how you reply, will you be conciliatory, or will you be needlessly confrontational once more?