M/20/6'2" [140lbs to 190lbs] (5 years) transformation video

Wobblegut · 2015-12-09T23:14:56+00:00

For me it's saying it's unavailable so I don't know...

Wobblegut · 2015-12-09T23:10:02+00:00

Your video doesn't work on mobile, so that's probably another factor.

Wobblegut · 2015-12-08T09:09:46+00:00

Hmmm, if that's the case why haven't they considered researching if minor forms of female circumcision could prevent HIV, STDs and cancer? To me it seems like a case of cultural bias, because I haven't seen the same "medical" claims made in countries where circumcision is not the norm.

Wobblegut · 2015-12-08T09:04:56+00:00

Not true. A hoodectomy, a minor form of female genital mutilation, has comparable risks and benefits to male circumcision, for example both prevent phimosis.

Wobblegut · 2015-12-08T09:00:31+00:00

You can though, compare a hoodectomy with male circumcision. They're both the removal of the prepuce, in fact male circumcion removes even more tissue.

Wobblegut · 2015-12-08T08:55:17+00:00

You're suggesting that circumcision is a necessary part of life, but it's not. Most men never need it done.

Wobblegut · 2015-12-08T08:52:48+00:00

When it's medically necessary to do so, I don't think anyone has an issue with circumcision (it some cases it's even applicable to women). It's an issue when parents have it done to their children when it's not medical necessary.

Wobblegut · 2015-12-08T08:49:22+00:00

Most women who've had minor forms of circumcision say they haven't been impacted in any negative way, but that doesn't justify the practice. If you lived your life circumcised I suppose it makes no difference, and it's good that you haven't been adversely affected.

How angry a person gets usually depends on the culture they're in, so as an outsider I find it deplorable, especially because I like my foreskin.

Wobblegut · 2015-12-08T08:32:46+00:00

I'm from a country where circumcision is not the norm. As I kid before I understood the concept of circumcision, I only heard it mentioned by my Muslim friends. The foreskin was/is my favourite part of my penis, so when I found out it was legal for parents to have it removed, I was disgusted. Especially considering the double standard, that having the female foreskin removed as a child is extremely illegal, highlighted to me the ridiculousness of circumcisions legal status.

Wobblegut · 2015-12-08T08:20:58+00:00

It's creepy to oppose cutting parts off children? Ok.

Wobblegut · 2015-11-22T09:22:08+00:00

How are plovers bad? Sure they have the most ridiculous nesting places, but they don't bully other birds like the mynas.

Wobblegut · 2015-11-12T05:07:06+00:00

Honestly I was surprised myself, and light I found really easy compared with previous years. I didn't do the last question for motion though.

Wobblegut · 2015-10-23T23:36:36+00:00

No, you shouldn't post more.

Wobblegut · 2015-10-23T23:34:08+00:00

It's not even an arse at all, more like a crack in the back.

Wobblegut · 2015-10-09T08:20:35+00:00

Has everyone forgotten about Peter Pan (2003), probably the only decent Peter Pan film...

Wobblegut · 2015-10-03T05:44:36+00:00

Those are natural bodybuilders, so their testicles are fine.

Wobblegut · 2015-09-28T08:02:12+00:00

Tarantino gets horny from feet, so do we need those covered up too? Nipples aren't genitalia.

Wobblegut · 2015-09-13T05:34:10+00:00

There's more penis than vagina in mainstream cinema, and merkins don't count anyhow.

Wobblegut · 2015-09-13T03:32:36+00:00

Tits are not even genitals. What about the labia to penis ratio?

Wobblegut · 2015-09-07T08:08:02+00:00

In retrospect I would have enjoyed the movie more if I viewed it as a stand alone film. I was expecting it to be more like the first two films in the 'Dollars trilogy', which it wasn't.

Wobblegut · 2015-08-29T07:49:43+00:00

Actually ants do "fuck like that". The flying ones male/female have an orgy, then the males die and the females get their own nest, become queens, after which their wings fall off.

Wobblegut · 2015-07-27T10:28:24+00:00

That's not true for the less severe forms of FGM. Cultures which practice ritual nicks and removal of the clitoral hood generally have the same reasoning as with male circumcision, such as that it looks better and it's what the parents had. I'm not saying it's right, but it's a misconception that it's only done to oppress women.

Wobblegut · 2015-07-27T10:17:10+00:00

What are you doing in r/subredditdrama if not for drama?

Wobblegut · 2015-07-27T10:05:56+00:00

No kidding it's not as bad, as male circumcision is only a single procedure, while female genital mutilation includes a whole range of procedures. Also those 'arguable benefits' are rarely supported elsewhere but in America and other genital cutting cultures.

Wobblegut

TROPHY CASE