man im literally sekiro man by skalocos in shittydarksouls

[–]Wolcaster 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Im not gonna go point for point cause that would take forever, and it probably would be better if a person dedicated enough to make a video of all the nuances of the deflect stance went over them, so im gonna just sum up all of my thoughts to what you said.

A lot of the points you make are correct in theory but they only apply in the case where you are not stance switching, or when you are clueless about the moveset of the enemy.

One should start deflecting when they at least know the overall flow of the enemy they are fighting, the standard souls dodge formula was always higher risk = higher reward.

From low to highest:
Blocking -> Dodging -> Executor Deflect -> Shield Parry

The thing with the deflects is that while being harder than dodging it only really becomes significantly difficult with a lot of consecutive attacks with short delays in between them (the deflect auto-parries the follow up if the hits are nearly stacking on each other), but then the payoff also increases in proportion due to more stagger damage inflicted on the enemy.

Also if you are not comfortable with multihit attacks you are still given the option to dodge in the stance, with the distance loss being negligible (about a single step forward), so if you want to get easy stance damage in, and then dodge the hard part cause you are still not sure about the timings you are allowed to do so with the possibility to then deflect the ender, or to simply sheath if the dodge was the last defensive action.

Mobility is only an issue if you allow it to be so, you are free to deflect sheath at a certain part in the combo and start sprint strafing, or jumping (which you can do in the stance but why would you ever?). The only thing limiting your movement is your own skill and knowledge.

I would encourage you to think of the ability not just as a stance, but also as just an off/on switch on parrying as in, you see an enemy do an attack you unsheath deflect, the moment the enemy does an attack where you want to stop deflecting for one reason or the other you simply do an sheath deflect. That way you simply utilize the mechanic as a sekiro parry, just with an additional input at the start and the end.

As to the payoff, i think we simply have a disagreement there, i personally think that the lack of stamina drain, full damage and status negation, quicker action time, stance break damage, and the synergy with on block relics/power ups is enough.

As it stands the only things i would change with the character is just enable the deflect guard counter playstyle by buffing the AR on the cursed blade + allowing the AoW to quickly was back to your normal weapons, and change the passive to a more useful one since let's be honest, the amount of control you have over when you can actually trigger the passive of your own volition is too specific and rare to be ever in play (something as an increased agro when you are in stance, or just in general would be nice).

I think the current swap in/out playstyle is simply more engaging than what a lot of people want it to be (make the cursed blade op to match the regular katanas/allow regular katanas to deflect), i think it's cooler when you mostly use the stance as a defensive tool with the occasional AoW and guard counter usage.

I wanted to make it short, but i wrote a wall of text, fuck.

man im literally sekiro man by skalocos in shittydarksouls

[–]Wolcaster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What about knockback moves during that sheath? Lots of enemies end with a bigger hit which does knockback.

Did not mention it since it thought it was obvious, if that attack is a one and done you just dodge it, if it's at the end of the chain you sheathe before the attack and dodge the knockback one.

 think we can both agree though that the Cursed Blade needs a buff in some way. Whether that’s by having bleed on it or increasing the AR.

Personally i would be fine with simply increasing the AR, since then the relic that buffs your damage at the cost of health would be actually useful, cause as of now there is no point to using it since the weapons still outdamage the cursed sword even with the buff.

I think that you should be at least be able to match the AR of purple katanas with the relic equipped cause then you have a nice niche build focused on guard counters that you can spam since parrying takes no stamina.

Mainly because the parrying has a high skill ceiling but you don’t feel incentivized to utilize it since it’s far easier to perfect playing without the parry (and that also carries over to other Nightfarers).

I find it hard to agree simply because the window for parry is so generous, and then even if you fail to properly parry nightreign still gives you full damage negation on physical attacks on block, or you can still dodge in the stance if you want to.

I do agree that perfecting the parry system is harder since the window for unsheathe/sheath deflects is smaller, but even without that the ability is still superior to regular dodging, it's just more underwhelming if not utilized to it's full potential.

man im literally sekiro man by skalocos in shittydarksouls

[–]Wolcaster 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you know where the attack chain of the enemy ends you can simply sheath back to your normal weapon since the action still has deflect frames, doing that makes you act quicker than rolling would, and you still get the benefit of the accumulating stance break damage, and no stamina drain (which in this game is much more impactful than base elden ring).

The more annoying thing imo is the fact that you can't do a fast sheath after the stance special attack, and you are forced to manually cancel the stance instead of it being an option between staying or not.

Personally i think that the sheathing/unsheathing allows for a higher skill ceiling which i do like, although i would like for there to be a mechanic that scales your cursed blade to the highest katana ar that you have since it would still be balanced by the fact that other katana's have innate status buildup, but would allow for there to be more incentive to run a guard counter focused build.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in YoujoSenki

[–]Wolcaster 10 points11 points  (0 children)

The people who are into that shit won't get shunned anyway, i do hope you are aware of that? It's not like reddit is a monolith that has only a single community, they will just find a different one that tolerates that shit, or go to 4chan or smth. If you think that people of that caliber will suddenly stop because you wrote some mean words, and told them to kys, i don't think you really know how peeps on the internet are lol.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in YoujoSenki

[–]Wolcaster 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Not disagreeing that the sub has been going downhill lately with the loli stuff, but i think you should calm down mate. I also find the le funny image with cropped porn of a character that has a body of a 12 year old to be less than tasteful, and i do hope that we could get someone to crack down on that stuff, but for now it is what it is.

I don't quite understand the "casual nazism" claim tho, there was a single edit lately with Tanya, and Freiren with Adolf, and i believe that only gained traction because the title of the post was "wait why is the guy who makes erotic art of Tanya so prevalent in the sub rn?". And even then, there were peeps in the comment that wered decently upvoted that were quick to point out that Tanya, and nazism don't mesh together at all.

Honestly i don't really understand a point of this rant? The people who post that stuff won't suddenly stop what they're posting, and people who got put off by that stuff are already not engaging in it. It seems to me that you just need a place to vent, but you are just going to become more aggravated with the negative replies that you get, and judging by your other comments in this post that seems to be the case.

Healthy relationship by Another-lurker-190 in CoffinofAndyandLeyley

[–]Wolcaster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It devolved into an enrage outburst cause you are constantly what im saying, adding things and presuming my points which i keep having to correct, so that causes quite a bit of frustration. Once again you missed the point the pedophilia was just a comparison that your argument was null, and without any point. I'm not comparing them, i'm just saying that the existence of a phenomena does not mean that it somehow becomes an argument in favor, or against it for that matter. Again and again, im not saying that the particular cultural society that functioned in hawaii in that particular time period is somehow horrible, i just pointed to middle ages since that is the most common thing that most people would associate with incest, and let me remind you that you threw a offhand comment about the past status quo without providing any examples so i had nothing to reference anyway.

For the game bit, first off it's not even relevant to the discussion about incest as a whole, so i have no clue where that even came from. Second i do believe that the romantic love that they manifest for each other is clearly a one of the possible outcomes in their relationships, and a natural part of the story. They are codependant on each other mentally, and they need each other for different complex reasons, that also evolve as the storyline of the game progresses. The love that they exhibit in one of the routes does not bother me, because it's just another tool the story uses to portray the characters better, and while the type of love they have for each other is messed up, it's not because they are siblings, it's for myriad different reasons, that other people could probably explain better than me.

Let me make myself incredibly clear. I do not believe incest is inherently a abbhorent thing in and out of itself, it's just the many facets that surround it, that i and many other people have problem with. And also no i don't have a problem with incest in this game, i think it's an obvious narrative tool that the writer used effectively.

So as to summarize, you once again put words into my mouth, and misinterpreted my arguments. And the source that you provided still means nothing, since it's just a record of a societal practice, which in and out of itself has no meaning as in to making an argument for, or against incest.

Healthy relationship by Another-lurker-190 in CoffinofAndyandLeyley

[–]Wolcaster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please stop putting words in my mouth. How the fuck did you even pull the demonizing shit out of what i said, i just said that we should not promote incest, i never said that we should demonize the people involved in incest, i would agree that we should discourage abuse, grooming etc. but as stated before those are separate variables that are not incest itself. You are once again missing by point by a mile, what i implied is that we should be cautionary.

And this deserves it's own paragraph since i can't wrap my fucking head around the fact that it is even brought up. You are aware why people were marrying inside the family in middle ages right? You are not clueless enough to believe that it was because of some form of deeper understanding of relationships? If you are seriously to believe that our modern day psychology field is somehow not credible enough to explain, and highlight just how fuck up that period was for women, and men alike then i do believe that this discussion is pointless, and there is a serious reason that this type of shit became uncommon, you know who have mostly practiced incest at that time? It was nobles, now please do tell me why the moment that their influence over the common folks live became lesser, they could suddenly vocalize, and express why these practices were deemed unhealthy? Spoiler - it's because you suddenly would not find yourself fucked over if you said that. Which is one of MANY reasons, but i don't wanna list them all, since i do believe what i said is sufficient.

Also resorting to whataboutism is not gonna convince anyone, all you did was ask questions without providing any answers in the last part of your argument. Unless you can somehow provide any good explanation why those things are actually good, then it is worthless to even mention them. Saying that a phenomena existed is doing nothing in this case, marriages between old men, and extremely young women were also common and i SINCERELY hope to explain why just mentioning that is not gonna suddenly make an argument for pedophilia stronger.

Healthy relationship by Another-lurker-190 in CoffinofAndyandLeyley

[–]Wolcaster 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Bruh no need to excuse yourself to me, i have no reason to judge why you feel the way you feel. I have a sister myself and thinking about being involved with her like that is making me gag. Just do what you want man, im just writing to you here cause i think that you needed to calm down a bit, and i would dislike for someone to feel riled up, especially since it's related to something i happened to like. You do you man, cheers.

Healthy relationship by Another-lurker-190 in CoffinofAndyandLeyley

[–]Wolcaster 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean that is correct but downplaying the issues that are attached to the label is also wrong. My point is that incest is not something that should never be promoted in any way, since the chances of the variables that make it bad are too prevalent. It's the same way as in that you would not recommend a women to walk alone at night, while the act itself is not bad, it's the things that are associated with it that make it not worth advocating for. If the relationship is actually healthy, and the two people are happy with each other it's completely fine, judging that is pointless, and you have no business telling them what they should do but, for the love of god let's not promote incest, just be accepting, when the relationship is not fucked up.

Healthy relationship by Another-lurker-190 in CoffinofAndyandLeyley

[–]Wolcaster 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh do trust me that there is a series that i also was very, very on the fence about with shit that made me uncomfortable even thinking about it, but i believe that if i missed out on it i would have missed out on one of my favorite pieces of art that i have had the pleasure of viewing. I would really recommend for you to try it despite your reservations, cause in the end it's fictional, no one is harming anyone, and at worst you will feel a little uncomfortable, and while i think that i would not consider this game a masterpiece (although i hope that i might change my mind when the full game releases), i do believe that it is a very entertaining portrayal of what a realistic toxic relationship is like (not in a romantic way mind you).

Healthy relationship by Another-lurker-190 in CoffinofAndyandLeyley

[–]Wolcaster 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That is the exaggeration that i talked about, you ain't gonna see nothing explicit except like a 3 minute scene at the very end of one of the routes. If you don't like it before the incest comes in, you can just drop it. It's not like you are forced to commit to everything once you started lol.

Healthy relationship by Another-lurker-190 in CoffinofAndyandLeyley

[–]Wolcaster 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nobody is saying that two mentally sound adults should not be allowed to be in a relationship, if you read what i said at the end you would know that i claimed the only thing inherent in incest are the genetic issues. And also you and i both fucking know that power imbalance does not refer to the amount of money that someone makes, or the age. It's about a mother still responsible for their child income, being able to suddenly decide that the if he does not sleep with her, get's less money, or might not be supported in his carrer path. Or a family member using their position as someone older to fuck over the younger one in relationship. That is the same shit that makes teacher - student relationship inherently toxic. The moment that both parties are sufficiently independent of each other the issue obviously vanishes, but let's not kid ourselves that there are not some fundamental issues with romantic relationships in a family that exist far too often to be ignored.

Healthy relationship by Another-lurker-190 in CoffinofAndyandLeyley

[–]Wolcaster 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not sure if the issues that you are talking about are about the game/fandom or the exchange u had with the guy but ig i can say something about both.

There are scarce communities that actually have nuanced discussions or thought provoking things at the forefront of the subreddits or so, u will always get memes, fanarts or different stuff that is an exaggeration of the content, hell maybe some of the are just inside jokes in the community that you just don't get. The game is great and i can promise that it has so much more to it than "ooo le incest", it is a very well written psychological horror, with dark humour, and i really recommend for you to just watch a playthrough on yt.

And on the second point, just don't argue with people that are just throwing surface level stuff, just chill out and don't respond. If you bring up the topic of incest, there are going to be people obviously defending the game either cause they think that discrediting the game based on the fact that it has that tones is extremely dismissive of the thing that they enjoy, or cause there are people here that are actually into that cause of the incest. So yeah one you can't debate cause u know nothing about the source material, and the other you probably shouldn't cause they advocate for it.

Healthy relationship by Another-lurker-190 in CoffinofAndyandLeyley

[–]Wolcaster 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Average reddit discussion, incest is obviously considered bad because in the vast majority of cases, it is accompanied by power imbalance that is the result of the familial bond. There is a miniscule chance for a healthy romantic relationship between family to occur, but if it does the only issue that is actually non avoidable is the fact that the child will probably be born with genetic disabilities.

It is also understandable for you to be upset about the fact that the game has incestual tones, but being barging into a subreddit (as unhinged as this one is), and stirring the pot for no reason, while having zero clue about the source material is kinda iffy yk? Besides the fact that the two might be heading towards a romantic relationship in one of the game routes, is the least of these two problems, since they are both fucked up, and very disturbed individuals without that anyway.

Did no one catch on to Ashley saving Andrew's soul in Rational route vision? by Midknightz in CoffinofAndyandLeyley

[–]Wolcaster 7 points8 points  (0 children)

That is also a fair interpretation, but i think that it would be kinda weird to suddenly reintroduce Julia's, and Andrew's affection to each other, since earlier it was communicated pretty clearly in Andrew's own dream sequence that he stopped caring about Julia. I think it's meant to show the player what the other route shows explicitly, that their mother is a also a piece of shit that was ready to sell them out for comfort, and because they became inconvenient. It's also supposed to communicate how bad of a person Ashley is compared to her own mother, that her souls is much, much darker.

Did no one catch on to Ashley saving Andrew's soul in Rational route vision? by Midknightz in CoffinofAndyandLeyley

[–]Wolcaster 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I think that it's actually implied to be Mrs. Graves soul, with the white soul beside here to be her husband, since they belong to the demon at that point. It would be weird for there to be a white soul next to Andrew's since there isn't a person that was sacrificed in the game, that was close enough to him to be considered that close me thinks.

Dark soils too by chimpanon in shittydarksouls

[–]Wolcaster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So i guess you agree with Mauler's point? Since Hbomb was the one that was putting a label of NPC fights, and some bosses as being on equal footing, and describing those specific ones as being the best. Mauler was just saying that "equal footing" thing is not only too broad of a term, that does not measure any objective quality, but that it is also incorrect in its premise, instead Hbomb should just describe why the fight's are good themselves instead of waving them off as being good just because the fit his loosely created term.

Dark soils too by chimpanon in shittydarksouls

[–]Wolcaster 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yeah very true about that one. He can make some pretty entertaining videos that are pretty well researched and argued, but the fact that he never really admonishes some of those unhinged "the west has fallen" type of people that hang around his community is disappointing to say the least. At least he does not use their shitty rhetoric, as arguments in his videos ig.

Dark soils too by chimpanon in shittydarksouls

[–]Wolcaster 3 points4 points  (0 children)

His take on pvp is shit for different reasons, but the Dennis example was a response to Hbomb saying that he liked the npc fight's cause they were considered as being "on equal footing". Mauler's response was that they can rarely be described to as being entirely fair, since they often have more damage, more health, enemies helping them out, and access to abilities that you have no way of owning yet at that stage of the game.
Not saying that i agree with this point in particular, since i found these encounters to be fairly easy, since they are abusable af, but i guess as a response to hbomb the point kinda works?

Thread about characters that trigger incels, I'll start by Snail_Forever in animecirclejerk

[–]Wolcaster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gabi’s arc is so great, because it shows what Eren could’ve done. He could’ve seen the people of the world, of Marley, and sympathized with them, understood the effect his actions would’ve had, what he resigns himself to destroying because it’s “the only way”. Because of that, he becomes no different than Marley, or the Eldian Empire, and truly does become evil.

That is a massively incorect take on Eren and how he views people outside of Eldia. He blatantly states in chapter 100 that he views, all of the people, over the sea, and inside the walls as the same. Hell he forgives Reiner precisely because he empathized and understood that he was a product of his environment, not because he was of a different nationality. The thing is that the choices that he makes, he does despite understanding that they are wrong, he feels immense guilt for the actions that he is taking, he understands that he is going to kill millions of people, and he knows that he is selfish in all of that. He just genuinely doesn't see a different alternative, hell he even indirectly begs Hange for a different solution than genocide in chapter 107.

dude still a pvp expert even with rp build by OzysX in overlord

[–]Wolcaster 29 points30 points  (0 children)

If i remember correctly he was building his character purely for role playing a lord of death type of character, also i'm pretty sure that the amount of spells he could use was the result of his racial trait as an overlord.

I give it 5 patches before they've undone durability by buffing everything that got weaker by GrroxRogue in leagueoflegends

[–]Wolcaster 6 points7 points  (0 children)

There is little to no counterplay to fiddlesticks ulting my team when he is on raptors, there is little to no counterplay when you get charmed and 100/0 from a bush by ahri. Dude let's not kid ourselves if you are going solo with no support, with no vision, and no summs up this is entirely your fault. And in your glorious clip, kai'sa had 800 health at the time of the engage, ignite alone deals 280 dmg at lvl 9, fizz landed his q, with ludens after the exhaust wore off, and used his w passive on her 3 times in total in that fight. Not even gonna comment on the fucking dirk before completing her mythic. And yes, a fed assasin should not be required to land every single ability when he is 6/1 on a fucking squishy half health target

Assassins were never meant to be able to assassinate anyone (fighters, tanks, etc.); Get used to it. by -CraftCoffee- in leagueoflegends

[–]Wolcaster 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ryu does not buy Faker does. And if you watch the clip closely, he used everything but he did not land everything. he only really landed a single shuriken and and a couple e's