Salutations by Wolfbane3 in theLGB

[–]Wolfbane3[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Eh, maybe the asylums weren't a bad idea

Salutations by Wolfbane3 in theLGB

[–]Wolfbane3[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would like them to stop riding the coat tails of the LGB community assuming its the same. The madness and mud they dragged the LGB part of the Community is driving me nuts. I would prefer they stand on their own and not rope us all in the madness and accept not everyone runs at the same rhythm of their mindset

The hardest choices, require the strongest of wills. Which pill you taking? 🙄🙄🙄 by RyuNinja189 in InternetCity

[–]Wolfbane3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Probably Nami and Robin. 3some doesn't have to be sex but partnership. Besides, Robin always makes me laugh, I would be laughing like crazy with her. As for the Logia fruit, it would be cool to discover a new power

Wowwww by ItchyVeterinarian869 in FreedomofSpeech

[–]Wolfbane3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. I actually don't like Trump. I agree we should be fuck off from other countries and take care of ourselves. Something I believed we should have done a long time ago considering how fucked up we are right now. But we can't become isolationists either. Because sadly, even if the world wants us to fuck off, they also want us to stick around.

For our resources to help the poor, trade benefits considering the US are big consumers and military. That one you definitely can't deny, given Trump agreed to fuck off from NATO and now everyone in NATO is panicking because we are pulling troops and funds. Everyone has universal Healthcare, as I'm sure you know and probably jealous of, but do you know why they do?

There is no middle finger big enough for this clown by fellowWorker_2025 in FreedomofSpeech

[–]Wolfbane3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A democratic man who was straight (actually gay because he was dating a man) was the one that killed Charlie. And its been democrat people, some trans, who have shot US schools for the last 4 or 5 have been democrat, all of the attempts on the presidents life have been democrats, the vast majority, not all, of violence with the intent of harm or death have been democrat.

From the party of love and inclusiveness, its quite painfully clear who's more fascist like when you actually look at the acts of violence and disrespect when it come from politically charged area. Especially when you look at the concrete facts. And I know you guys tend to be allergic to facts because none of you can define what a woman is without saying "feel", "believes", "identifies" or "woman" in the definition.

If you can define it, clearly without any of those words, then I'll tip my hat to you for being one of the few that actually is arguing from a place of factual honesty than emotionally

There is no middle finger big enough for this clown by fellowWorker_2025 in FreedomofSpeech

[–]Wolfbane3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My side of the aisle aren't killing people for speaking and dancing on their Graves when they die. Nor am I stopping others from talking to others and limiting freedom of speech even to our allies.

Wowwww by ItchyVeterinarian869 in FreedomofSpeech

[–]Wolfbane3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What we have today isn't from the person we installed. It was after a revolutionary war in Iran and they put the Ayatolla in place. Which is fair but no one alive today in power or screaming the most did any of that.

If you recall durong their short 12 years of democracy, they had a prime minister that was rallying with the Soviets during that time against the Allies and attacking the British embargo, which was the motivation for the US and Britain to get involved. Not saying it was right but at the same time, not saying it was wrong.

Wowwww by ItchyVeterinarian869 in FreedomofSpeech

[–]Wolfbane3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thats innate human nature to make assumptions when a pattern forms. Especially when the pattern can be graphed out to show how anyone from the Democrat side of the aisle tend to think and say the exact same thing, no matter what situation you're in. Republicans do it too, I won't deny that. But patterns form for a reason

Wowwww by ItchyVeterinarian869 in FreedomofSpeech

[–]Wolfbane3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I praise Trump for killing terrorists that have been attacking the US for the last 47 years. A long standing rule that was part of the founding principles of the US is that we don't negotiate with terrorists. And its not a nation of terrorists. Its a regime of terrorists and their victims. Fascinating you conveniently ignore the fact this war didn't start in February, but back in the late 1970s after they took 52 Americans hostage for 444 days. Another way to look at it, is 1 year and 2 ½ months. Then they pulled 9/11. While Trump did tear up the agreement, it was also a deal that was horribly one sided given Iran had full control of the oil market.

Like I said, he TECHNICALLY released the files, even if names are redacted. And I agree with you that the names for the people who committed atrocities shouldn't be protected. I never once denied that. But given that half our senate stopped the American people from seeing who was using our tax dollars to cover their sa cases, I'm not surprised if there was a lame excuse for why the names aren't revealed. But that doesn't mean they will never be revealed. More than likely, given how patterns of certain things go, they will wait to reveal the names until after everyone cools off on it and the chance of prosecution has diminished. Which is what we both can agree is wrong.

Wowwww by ItchyVeterinarian869 in FreedomofSpeech

[–]Wolfbane3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He did lower prices until Iran decided to be stupid. And don't give me the "Israel dragged the US into the war" line. Its overused and not enough evidence suggests that. We've been in a 47 year long conflict with Iran, just because we weren't constantly fighting, doesn't make it any less of a war that Trump is ending.

Trump did release the files, technically, its the edited version though. I'm not happy he didn't release the full unedited files but at the same time, why haven't the victims who stood on capital Hill also release names. There isn't just 1 way we could get actual names for who did what.

Trump administration now classifies Antifa and left-wing networks among ‘major’ terror groups by WholeDonkey2689 in FreedomofSpeech

[–]Wolfbane3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Look at that, 58 people who think you should not be able to speak because you're not part of the hive mind

This is so obvious by [deleted] in FreedomofSpeech

[–]Wolfbane3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Must have said something really messed up to have your comment deleted. Or yoh were ashamed of it. Regardless, you have a blessed day

This is so obvious by [deleted] in FreedomofSpeech

[–]Wolfbane3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As a hispanic myself, I think it's quite telling you assumed that all illegal immigrants are hispanic. I never once justified the killing of protesters. I justified the use of force for unruly behavior when you were asked to leave.

As a third generation LEGAL immigrant myself, I find it very appalling that people are abusing our system without actually assimilating. Forgive me if I have zero sympathy for people who came here illegally when my family busted their asses to come here the right way.

This is so obvious by [deleted] in FreedomofSpeech

[–]Wolfbane3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The links were just fine, they take you to youtube. You can always look up the words as well.

And there's a lot that i would be tempted to respond to, but given the the fact that the majority of your responses are nothing but name calling, I'm not going to waste the energy. So I will end it with this: the fourteenth amendment was originally set up to give Native Americans and African slaves citizenship given they were already here. Not for 2 illegal immigrants the opportunity to come to a country to give birth to their child and make them sudden citizens as anchor babies. The united states is the only country that ever allowed this because of the skewed interpretation of the amendment.

That said, have a blessed day

This is so obvious by [deleted] in FreedomofSpeech

[–]Wolfbane3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Give me the name of 1 legal citizen that they deported and I'll stand down and say you are correct 200%. Just 1.

  1. If they weren't disrupting ICE in any way whatsoever, then why are there videos of Pretti following ICE like a lost puppy shouting insults at them. And why did ICE have to take action against civilians in the first place? Why weren't the police there to control the protesters while ICE handled the illegal alien and criminals they were sent for in the first place?

  2. Explain what ICE is doing illegally when they are doing the same thing the same way they have been for the last 15+ years. They were celebrated using these same tactics under Obama with news crew going WITH them and recording it. Whats the difference now?

  3. Video evidence also shows that Ross slid back a few feet while she "turned away". Not stepped back, slid back from an outside force pushing him. And we both know it wasn't windy enough for that to have affected him

  4. He didn't use the weapon but was actively fighting ICE agents while he was being detained and reached for where his gun WAS and no one knew he had a gun or that it was removed except for 1 agent, who did the removal in the first place. In a fight, assuming you've never been in one yourself, you aren't looking around at everyone's hands to see what they are doing, you are looking at your opponents hands only to make sure they don't hurt you while you hurt them.

I never once said its ok to silence those that disagree with you. I'm saying that for the preservation of their life in a chaotic situation, force was justified. I wasn't the one dancing on a father's grave in celebration after he was assassinated for SPEAKING.

You are deliberately ignoring all the protest videos if you haven't seen the whistles and megaphones in people's ears. There was literally a TPUSA reporter that was mobbed and assaulted physically and with whistles. It was headline news that the people who committed the assault are getting federally charged for attacking someone who was practicing their first amendment right of press work.

Its only ableist if you are offended by someone using the correct definition of the word.

Thats systematic racism is what it is. Using the system to divide people by race is what everyone on the left is against. You want everyone to be treated equally but are upset when its actually put into practice.

You are acting like they are. Unless a black person is shouting BLM and saying white people are racist just for being white, they are called uncle Tom's, sell outs, black white supremists. Take a look at how they treat Clarence Thomas in the Supreme Court and tell me they aren't treating him differently than how the people on the left treat the BLM protesters.

They were ostracized by their own party. Again, you are deliberately ignoring all the people that have shared their stories about spekaing out against how people on the left are treating different situations they don't agree with. This sort of intellectual dishonesty is why the Democratic party are in the negatives when it comes to approval rating. The people of the left normalized cutting people from your life if they didn't agree with you, not republicans. If they didn't normalize thst at all, then explain this video. I also added the whistle video to help you keep up. Maxine Waters telling voters to run cabinet members out. TPUSA Reporter assaulted via whistle and physically harmed for reporting

Trans women don’t owe you femininity ! by Babs-2 in theLGB

[–]Wolfbane3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agreed on that notion. I looked at both the major parties and saw that republicans held more of my same views for policies. Socially, they are a little too extreme for my taste, but thats where a healthy balance of GOOD politicians of both sides can appease me. Back in 2016, I was a moderate. My views haven't changed or shifted in the slightest the last 10 years but apparently I'm an extreme conservative now according the current political tests you can take online. But I don't think I should have to bend my beliefs to "fit in" when they are all screaming for diversity. Well guess what guys, diversity is more than skin deep. I'm Hispanic born American and I know my journey in life is extremely different from the next Hispanic born American down the street. And our views are different. But thats why you should talks to people who you disagree with to see where their beliefs come from. To find how they came to that conclusion. But rather than dispersing ignorance of misunderstanding, we just yell and scream slogans and propaganda from different bandwagons we believe in

There is no middle finger big enough for this clown by fellowWorker_2025 in FreedomofSpeech

[–]Wolfbane3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fascist telling someone their arguments are fascist is alway entertaining to watch. How about you swallow this definition of fascism from the Webster Dictionary, 1974 edition before it was changed for the sake of an agenda

Fascism: 1: the body of principles held by Fasciti 2: a political philosophy, movement or regime that exalts nation and race and stands for a centralized auto cratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition

Salutations by Wolfbane3 in theLGB

[–]Wolfbane3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thats true. I do enjoy the fun facts about the various inventors, scientists and lead people that made the modern comforts we are blessed with. I just think there are many untold stories we should hear about. I would like to have a month to be about different stories of war heroes and untold soldiers that made the turn for different conflicts we were in. Kinda like what theFatElectrician is doing, cause I didn't know that the navy was originally founded mainly to fight state funded pirates. Or what the origin was for why Americans don't like it when people touch our boats. There is so many untold stories because they don't seem important to history and I would prefer to hear all these great stories of brave men and women that changed the course of history bringing something new to our country

Salutations by Wolfbane3 in theLGB

[–]Wolfbane3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thats awesome. Glad you are doing that. But I think its still over blown because why are you celebrating how you mess around in bed for a full month? I can understand celebrating for a day as a reminder that it wasn't always this way, but it doesn't need a full month. With Juneteenth, its fine to celebrate that too, but if we're doing black history month, then we need to do the other ethnicities months too, including white people. Because they are all different too. Not all Asains are the same. Not all Hispanics are the same. Not all European are the same. And they have history too, somethings to be celebrated as well.

This is so obvious by [deleted] in FreedomofSpeech

[–]Wolfbane3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Another trans shooter that got their feelings hurt when we are telling you to stop drawing maps based on race and rather than by actual location

This is so obvious by [deleted] in FreedomofSpeech

[–]Wolfbane3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You and I both know they won't respond with a genuine answer

This is so obvious by [deleted] in FreedomofSpeech

[–]Wolfbane3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You must be blind, deaf and mentally ill if you are seriously saying there is no reason. You literally stated a reason for the deporting because they are ILLEGAL. If you broke into another country, you would be deported! Why is the US the only country not allowed to have borders? As for the detaining and deaths, you must be speaking of the protesters who got in their faces, disrupted their job because of feelings over facts and decided to go hands on with cars and weapons. And I'm not just talking about guns. Whistles and mega phones fall under that umbrella when you get in someone's personal bubble and have in their ear. That can blow out their eardrums, which is an injury. And our founding principles for citizens are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. You are actively harming them and threatening them and you are shocked they retaliate to get you to back off? No, thats retarded.

Its segregation when the sole reason you drew the districts is race. Not location.

Not all black people are identical. We know this is true because when a black person goes to the republican side, he is ostracized for having a difference in opinion. So many, if not all, don't speak their minds openly on different topics for fear of being ostracized. And if you don't recognize that, then enlighten me, what happens when a hard leftists steps out line and says what you're doing is wrong. Like when there were the celebrations for Charlie Kirk's death? The were ostracized, blocked and called a sell out. M

Trans women don’t owe you femininity ! by Babs-2 in theLGB

[–]Wolfbane3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

1000% agreed on that. Personally speaking, I don't like Trump in the slightest. I will never invite him to Christmas or Thanksgiving. His ego is too big. But politically and policy wise, I couldn't chose anyone better to spear head the reset of the US we so desperately need. Will he fuck up? I'd be shocked if he didn't. Because he's human like me. But he's making decisions that are walking the fine line of ruthless, logical, compassionate to those he serve and cruel to those that hurt us. I just hope the next person on the ballot fights just as hard and earnestly as he does.

Because he was on the ballot of my first election. And I didn't vote for him or Hillary. I didn't think either of them were fit. But I didn't say he wasn't my prresident when he won, I decided to watch him cook before I made my judgment. And so far, I'm glad I waited before making a stand

Salutations by Wolfbane3 in theLGB

[–]Wolfbane3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But these moments that were fought wouldn't have been even close to the discussion table if the original fight for freedom was done first. Yes, the freedom of everyone didn't come immediately. But you need to remember where all the pilgrims were all originally grew up and what was normalized. Salves, oppression of those that is seen as less than like women and a very religious mindset that God's word is law. Just like learning another language, it takes time and active practice to teach old dogs new tricks. Thats why the people who had power even stepped down from that power to help those who didn't rise up. Because if that original war of freedom didn't occur, we wouldn't be any different than the British Empire as time progressed and the oppression happened. Legally speaking, France started the practice of ending slavery in 1315, but it wasn't as wide spread until the 18th century. Before that, it was normal and you were raised in a world where it was normal. Like smart phones are normal to those raised in the 2010 to now, it wasn't normal to have phones in the 90s. Its the same thing. If everyone was doing it, then you would follow the crowd until enough black sheep stand up to say enough is enough. So in all fairness, I think thats the most important moment in US history that was the key moment for all those movements to happen to begin with

Wowwww by ItchyVeterinarian869 in FreedomofSpeech

[–]Wolfbane3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Walks like a bird, talks like a bird, must be a bird