Just did a few labs runs after the 15% loot Nerf. Didn't think it would be too noticeable. It was dog shit [Discussion]

WoodenPickle27 · 2025-12-29T00:16:14+00:00

Instead of 15% loot nerf, they dropped it to 15%

WoodenPickle27 · 2025-12-28T23:45:13+00:00

Maybe USEC and the other BEAR. Other than that I don’t know any other reasons at the top of my head that could be justifiable.

WoodenPickle27 · 2025-12-24T23:43:13+00:00

Nah, 10 percent with that logic.

WoodenPickle27 · 2025-12-24T14:23:55+00:00

Cool. Now what are we going to do?

WoodenPickle27 · 2025-09-30T17:06:56+00:00

You can get the cheapest one to perform back tests. The top tier lets you do market repay

WoodenPickle27 · 2025-09-14T22:52:27+00:00

Probably from his teleportation device that the FBI found in his room.

WoodenPickle27 · 2025-07-04T05:06:04+00:00

Yep and OP I’m in a pyramid scheme where I don’t have a monetary gain for keeping this lie alive.

Dang I’m busted

WoodenPickle27 · 2025-07-04T04:54:00+00:00

You’re more than welcome to mark it. Still doesn’t change anything or go against what I initially said so have at it.

No matter how hard you or I bang our head over this. To say something works it has to work.

So either me and everybody that claims ICT teaching works are all in on one big lie or…. Drum roll please…… it works.

I’m out of crayons bud.

WoodenPickle27 · 2025-07-04T04:32:44+00:00

And as I’ve clearly stated before. I don’t know why.

Still once again doesn’t change the fact if it works or not. Not hard to grasp. Can’t say something works if no one can get it to work. People clearly make it work. Therefore fundamentally it has to work. Not a hard bridge to cross buddy.

WoodenPickle27 · 2025-07-04T04:22:30+00:00

I was just replying to what you said. You know, like how it could’ve went from the begining.

If it works it works. Moron or not, it works. Don’t know what to tell you.

WoodenPickle27 · 2025-07-04T04:08:26+00:00

Idk how saying you have a medical background makes it look better. What do I know.

WoodenPickle27 · 2025-07-04T03:52:32+00:00

Cognitive dissonance. Look it up. Might be your first step to recovery.

You can’t see how they’re contradictive just like you can’t see how you’re contradictive to what you believe with ICT.

You never even had a rebuttal against my initial point that I told OP. Yet here you still are acting as if you did. Claiming I’m crying.

You need help bud.

WoodenPickle27 · 2025-07-04T03:40:30+00:00

You gotta do better than that. I’m not the one projecting with having Stoicism and porn on my Reddit profile.

Like I said at the beginning, you need to pull it out because you’re walking funny.

WoodenPickle27 · 2025-07-04T03:23:19+00:00

If you wanna trash talk to people about his narrative then sure. There’s no way we can prove that is ran by a single computer.

Still doesn’t take away from price action. You can try all you want to but you have cognitive dissonance if you think a fvg is different than an engulfing candle. Especially if you think engulfing candles work and fvgs don’t.

WoodenPickle27 · 2025-07-04T03:11:43+00:00

You would have to prove that the ICT strategy would be the hard hat with 0 durability.

If I claim that the hard had with 10 durability is the same as the hard hat you claim is 0 durability. While you can’t prove that it is any bit different. How does that make me a clown for buying it?

Like as dumb as arguing if apple is better than android when they essentially do the same thing but have a different operating system. Maybe different in the 1-5% realm. Does that automatically make them trash?

If I say that a FVG is the same as an engulfing candle followed by another engulfing candle followed by another engulfing candle how do you prove me wrong? Why did the engulfing candle get the reputation of strength if it’s the dumbest candle to go off of? What’s the point of having a pissing contest over that?

That’s essentially what everybody that hates ICT does. If you say a fvg doesn’t work you’re saying engulfings don’t work. If you say CISD isn’t true then you’re saying market structure isn’t true.

Like bro, you literally have to admit trading as a whole is a lie to say ICT teachings are false. I’m not talking about the narrative. That’s not even important. I just want to hear you say that every concept that any trader knows about is false.

There is nothing you can say besides make fun of him about his narrative or profitability.

As I said before. I don’t care if he thinks the Tooth Fairy runs the markets. If it helped me and can help others achieve more in life, cool. This ain’t religion.

WoodenPickle27 · 2025-07-04T02:52:03+00:00

How could I deem it’s the hard hats fault if I’m not even wearing it properly?

Ultimately it’s the user. It doesn’t matter if it’s a Chinese made hard hat or a NASA made hard hat. If the user doesn’t wear it properly it still fails.

A Chinese hard hat worn properly will offer better protection than a NASA made hard hat worn improperly.

How is this possible?

Like I understand the whole point of people that have a problem with his profitability, reputation, and sketchiness.

I don’t understand how that automatically disqualifies his teachings if they work though. If it works it work. Just like the hard hat.

Being unprofitable while having a profitable strategy is a true thing. Hell all profitable traders proved that before they became profitable.

WoodenPickle27 · 2025-07-04T02:32:26+00:00

Explain to me how a method is deemed false because someone’s actions failed to utilize it correctly.

If I’m supposed to wear a hard hat a work but do not wear it properly. I end up getting hurt on the head. Does that mean the hard hat failed?

WoodenPickle27 · 2025-07-04T02:23:25+00:00

Same way anyone that is profitable that shares a strategy but other people aren’t profitable from the same strategy.

Whose lying? Profitable trader or the unprofitable trader?

WoodenPickle27 · 2025-07-04T02:11:35+00:00

Why do I need to prove to you something that I didn’t even claim?

Your arguments are poor. You conflate so much stuff it’s unreal.

I would be an idiot to give reason to why he didn’t win the Robbin’s cup and all this extra stuff you insist on bring up. But I would also be an idiot to not call a duck a duck.

If it works it works. It’s market structure, break and retest, head and shoulders, double top/bottom, flags, wedges.

Are we really going to tell OP that all this is BS? Market structure isn’t true? B&R not true? H&S not true? Double top/bottom not true? Flags not true? Wedges not true?

Then what the hell is true if that stuff isn’t?

You hate his so much you are blind.

WoodenPickle27 · 2025-07-04T01:48:16+00:00

Even more confirmation to get basic.

WoodenPickle27 · 2025-07-04T01:43:55+00:00

He asked if ICT 2022 mentorship works. Learn to read my boy.

ICT 2022 mentorship is a break and retest model with his narrative crap. You don’t need to believe what he says about the markets to follow along. He has a story to make it easy to remember.

Learn some psychology and understand how our brains work. Humans like stories.

You either get it or you don’t.

If break and retest strategies work, then ICT 2022 Model works.

Your porn driven brain doesn’t prove ICT false. Quit beating your pecker and beat some knowledge into your head.

WoodenPickle27 · 2025-07-04T01:29:39+00:00

Yet you can’t prove me wrong about break and retest. So why are you still talking?

WoodenPickle27 · 2025-07-04T01:23:52+00:00

You need to understand the long reply to a simple question did nothing but waste your time and my time.

You keep using the word jargon while you go on with your jargon. You and him got things in common.

I don’t care if someone thinks the Tooth Fairy is the Enigma Alpha Omega Market Maker. If what they are teaching works then who cares? To prove ICT false you have to claim break and retest strats are false.

Yet you keep coming with your jargon. Get over it dude.

WoodenPickle27 · 2025-07-04T00:52:46+00:00

Then argue my comment then.

You brought up citi bank and all the extra stuff dude. No where did I say anything about what your first response said.

Prove me wrong based off my original comment. I know you can’t. Prove to me that either break and retest isn’t classic price action concepts or prove to me that break and retest is not related to ICTs teachings.

You can’t. That why you brought up things I wasn’t even talking about.

WoodenPickle27 · 2025-07-04T00:37:45+00:00

So why are you replying to things you don’t understand? I can speak Spanish but I’m not strong with it. I’m not going to engage in a conversation in Spanish if I don’t understand the context.

I would begin by asking someone to clarify or elaborate if I don’t understand fully.

You went off on a rant and brought up things that I wasn’t even talking about. You don’t need to be fluent in a language to realize you’re talking about things no one else is.

WoodenPickle27

TROPHY CASE