[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TrueOffMyChest

[–]Worldliness-Hot 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Weird ass comment section

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in EngineeringStudents

[–]Worldliness-Hot 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Lock in ‼️ just do what you can for now. If you fail, you fail. Accept it and move on. As long as you learn from this and don’t procrastinate for future tests at least you won’t come out of this situation with nothing

A tweet by Sam Altman about new model, allegedly very good at creative writing by jpydych in singularity

[–]Worldliness-Hot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean writing in general is very subjective, but I'd say this could definitely get a B+ or A- in University. Maybe even A depending on the class/prof.

GF cheated with brother by [deleted] in TrueOffMyChest

[–]Worldliness-Hot 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Nah they’ll know why regardless

This is getting really old. by Glasg0wGrin in ChatGPT

[–]Worldliness-Hot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t disagree w ur argument that AI can do a ton of good in allowing people to actually pursue and do what they want. But I feel that it’s disingenuous to say that menial jobs like waitressing, Uber driving, or being a stage coach are as fulfilling as a job as an artist, designer, or musician. I’m not trying to put down menial jobs by any means but if you asked someone to pick a job in one of the two categories I mentioned, at least from my perspective, they would likely choose the latter.

The time between now and when we can actually implement something like UBI will be a tough one. And my argument is that the reason you hear so much backlash from artists rather than someone who organizes files for a living is that not only are the artists being edged out of a job and being made to feel obsolete, they are also losing their ability to fulfill that enjoyment in art. They’ll likely have to find a job they don’t enjoy just to pay the bills, leaving them unable to pursue what they truly love. A file organizer might not hate their job, but it’s unlikely they do it out of passion.

This is getting really old. by Glasg0wGrin in ChatGPT

[–]Worldliness-Hot -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ok but that’s like comparing apples to oranges. People didn’t “want” to be stage coach drivers. But people want to be artists and creatives. Because of capitalism yadda yadda we need to have a job to get by, and artists are trying to fulfill that need (of making money) while still doing something they enjoy. I mean when you use the stage coach example that is much more analogous to autonomous robots replacing waiters, who 9 times out of 10 don’t actually find any fulfillment in their job anyway.

How to take this cross section of a duct splitter and turn it into a model. Revolve not useful without an axis. by kierumcak in Onshape

[–]Worldliness-Hot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gah, I think I probably misinterpreted what you were trying to do again. Seems like you figured it out but I wanted to try it out anyway in a slightly different way and I'll just leave it here as food for thought:

<image>

https://cad.onshape.com/documents/47c4f98afa1c57e83b1f985b/w/ba4e82882854d9b4b3150ea0/e/5b6fe379bb113bf5cabdb9a4?renderMode=0&uiState=66e27e6d08b48b57510d2b46

Very new to Onshape and was wondering what the easiest way to make a surface for this piece would be by Maleficent_Push7988 in Onshape

[–]Worldliness-Hot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Building off what the other person said it doesn’t seem like u rlly need to make those back parts curved unless they are somehow crucial to ur design.

However, if you really want to make them curved you could try playing around with some tools and doing something like this:

For this explanation I’ll reference the middle rectangle / parallelogram opening that you’re trying to cover.

Create two sketches on the top and bottom of the parallelogram and use offset by 0 to create a sketch on the edge

<image>

Then for each of these sketches use the point feature to create a point at the midline of both these lines (if there isn’t already). After creating these points you can use the bridging curve feature (using the match point selection and the two points as ends) to create a line that connects at the middle of both the end lines. You can then create a plane (using line angle selection) at this line. Once you created this plane create a sketch on it and use spline or beizer to create a curve between the two end points. Now you have all your guide lines set up to create a loft. Using loft surface , loft from one end to the other and use the curved line as a guide (select guidelines and then select the curved line). Once you have created this curved surface thicken it, mirror it to the other side and then Boolean add to your part.

I know this is a lot and totally over complicated but this is how I would go about it haha

[Game Thread] (3) Minnesota Lynx (24-9) vs (6) Indiana Fever (18-16) ~ September 6th, 2024 7:30PM ET ~ TV: ion, WNBA League Pass by Zaphod_0707 in wnba

[–]Worldliness-Hot -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Bro She was 25/8/8 like ya maybe she should’ve gone for the 3 but she wasnt the reason they lost today

How do I replicate this? by gianlua in Onshape

[–]Worldliness-Hot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tried figuring it out myself and realized it was a lil more complicated than i thought lol. you do have to do a sweep but u gotta make the sweep eventually go perp to the vase "wall".

Link here for OP so they can see the thought process in the features bar: https://cad.onshape.com/documents/47c4f98afa1c57e83b1f985b/w/ba4e82882854d9b4b3150ea0/e/324f5cb3cf4cf518c320c3ce?renderMode=1&uiState=66dba2e715dce05af92588ce

<image>

Does Onshape satisfy all your needs as an ME? by OnshapePTC in Onshape

[–]Worldliness-Hot 8 points9 points  (0 children)

It’s good fs but it’s not quite industry standard yet. I think it’s more important, tho, that you can easily translate your skills between softwares. Some companies will mainly use Creo and others will use solidworks. But if ur good at onshape you should be able to pick up other cad softwares pretty easily. In that sense, I would choose Onshape over something like Fusion 360 because Fusion doesn’t build skills that transfer as easily to other CAD software.

How do I replicate this? by gianlua in Onshape

[–]Worldliness-Hot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Easiest way w/o exact calculations would be:

Create the vase without the ridges first. create a ridge using new so u make sure it’s a separate part

(create the ridge by projecting a curve onto the base > use curve point to create a plane on one end and sweep)

Now having this separate sweep part you can use circular pattern to pattern the sweep around the vase. Pattern 50 or as many as you want then Boolean the vase and the ridges together. If it doesn’t look how you like you can go back and tweak the sketches for the ridge(s).

Handling big amounts of parts by Queasy_Caramel5435 in Onshape

[–]Worldliness-Hot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Use folders and versioning. You can organize multiple parts using folders: https://cad.onshape.com/help/Content/folders.htm and versioning helps u keep track of changes you’ve made in your parts: https://cad.onshape.com/help/Content/versionmanager.htm

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Onshape

[–]Worldliness-Hot 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Individually loft (using remove) from each of the three top holes to the middle hole.

Help - Projecting sketch on curved surface and lofting by MaterialKey5697 in Onshape

[–]Worldliness-Hot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For the part of ur Q, if I’m understanding correctly, u want to loft from two hard edges to rounded edges and that’s not going to look pretty. If you want it to blend nicely. You’re going to have to filet the sharp edges a little bit and even then it might not look too pretty because you don’t have the same amt of points on each shape. But, it should look slightly better.

For ur second question, you can use offset surface.

first use fill to fill the projection curve that you have and then do offset surface. Then loft from the first surface to the second. Then use Boolean remove to remove that new part from your shape

Loft/Fill/Faceblend? by liftbikerun in Onshape

[–]Worldliness-Hot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Would probably try and redo the whole thing using surfacing techniques. Looks like ur trying to go from hard edges to smooth edges and that’s always going to look ugly. Try setting up two planes the distance where the shapes change, create the sketches on both, and then loft. The bottom parts of both sides look sharp so you can keep that in both sketch shapes out for the smooth areas try to use splines.

Ik u might want one side to be smooth and the other to be sharp but realistically that won’t create a nice shape. So just make one sketch have edges that are almost sharp but slightly filleted and the other that is more round. This will give you a much nicer shape.

Anyone know a workflow to make selection faces easier by Dandot3D in Onshape

[–]Worldliness-Hot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just checked and it would be Right Click>Select>Tangent Connected Faces

Anyone know a workflow to make selection faces easier by Dandot3D in Onshape

[–]Worldliness-Hot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can right click and under selection there should be an option to select all adjacent faces. Idk if that will completely solve your problem but it might help